I Wear Pants wrote: I see a man shaking another mans hand while observing the proper manners of someones culture. So unless you're seeing something that I'm not I've got to assume you are using this to say that Obama "bows down to China" or something. Which isn't something that started with this administration.

eersandbeers wrote:

believer wrote: Another reason not to like this clueless twit:

Where was this outrage before?

RoyalNut wrote: People you all better wake up as far as what is going on in Washington. Not all that is going can be attributed to Obama, George Bush in his last four years was horrible president, and from what I can see he just handed the baton to Obama and he is running with it. But The Government has done so many things to endanger our freedoms in the past few years it is out right scary. What you might say? Well the take over of the Auto Industry for one, Bail out of the Banks two the shoving down our throats of a Health care bill that if you do not buy health insurance you will be fined or sent to prison? WHAT????????????? Still talking about cap-n-trade that is no more then a carbon tax that will make every single person in Americas energy cost "Necessarily skyrocket!" Obama's words not mine. And why? The entire Global warming thing is based on UNPROVEN SCIENCE yet it will cost 150 million jobs per year here in America. Why hasn't America built a new Nuclear Power plant in over 20 years? People there are things going on here, that are not right. Its time for the American people to wake up and smell the Coffee here. Obama and his czars even want to control what can be put on the internet. Did you know that?

Of the above things they have done and are trying to do, Can anyone tell me where it says these people have the right to do any of these things in the American Constitution?

Oh and just for giggle google Lord Monkton Copenhagen treaty and give that a watch. That may open some eyes.

"His bow is neither (1) unprecedented nor (2) a sign of cultural understanding," an academic who knows Japanese culture well explained in a message to ABC's Jake Tapper. In 1971, President Nixon bowed to Emperor Hirohito and his wife and repeatedly referred to them as "Your Imperial Majesties."
Nixon got the bow right, though -- a slight bend from the waist with hands at his side. "Obama's handshake/forward lurch was ... jarring and inappropriate," according to Tapper's friend.
Thomas Lifson, who lived in Japan for years and taught hundreds of foreign executives the right way to bow, agreed that -- regardless of any political subtext -- Obama's combination low-bow/handshake was a mess.
It "violates a fundamental precept: NO TOUCHING while bowing," Lifson wrote for the American Thinker blog.
He also noted that Emperor Akihito had a big smile on his face as Obama bowed.
"That's pretty much polite Japanese for 'falling down laughing,'" Lifson explained.

zhon44622 wrote:

RoyalNut wrote: People you all better wake up as far as what is going on in Washington. Not all that is going can be attributed to Obama, George Bush in his last four years was horrible president, and from what I can see he just handed the baton to Obama and he is running with it. But The Government has done so many things to endanger our freedoms in the past few years it is out right scary. What you might say? Well the take over of the Auto Industry for one, Bail out of the Banks two the shoving down our throats of a Health care bill that if you do not buy health insurance you will be fined or sent to prison? WHAT????????????? Still talking about cap-n-trade that is no more then a carbon tax that will make every single person in Americas energy cost "Necessarily skyrocket!" Obama's words not mine. And why? The entire Global warming thing is based on UNPROVEN SCIENCE yet it will cost 150 million jobs per year here in America. Why hasn't America built a new Nuclear Power plant in over 20 years? People there are things going on here, that are not right. Its time for the American people to wake up and smell the Coffee here. Obama and his czars even want to control what can be put on the internet. Did you know that?

Of the above things they have done and are trying to do, Can anyone tell me where it says these people have the right to do any of these things in the American Constitution?

Oh and just for giggle google Lord Monkton Copenhagen treaty and give that a watch. That may open some eyes.

Glenn Beck, Is that you?

Swamp Fox wrote: I think the sample is somewhat skewed. President Obama will never do well in this crowd. I don't think that what we have here is even close to the national perception of the programs he has suggested and attempted to put into practice. if it's something associated with the President it is automatically rejected because it's socialistic, or it's communistic, or it's muslim, or it has been introduced by a man who isn't even a citizen, etc. etc. etc. I think a more accurate gauge of how he is doing will begin to emerge as the re-election campaign begins in earnest. There is plenty of time and I think the conservatives want to flood the airways with diversionary tactics designed to make us think about non-issues instead of the mess we are trying to extricate ourselves from. The more confusion and chaos the conservatives can cause with their scare tactics, the better they think their chances are in 2012. I think we should just wait and see what happens in 2012. There is a lot of time between now and then. Wouldn't the conservatives be heartbroken if the country was much better off in 2012 than we had been in 2008?

Writerbuckeye wrote:
He followed proper protocol for two heads of state, something that escapes Obama.

Just because you don't like who he's with doesn't mean there should be outrage.

do it without mentioning Bush if that is possible.

RoyalNut wrote: Or have we come to a place where the Constitution means nothing?

eersandbeers wrote:

RoyalNut wrote: Or have we come to a place where the Constitution means nothing?

The Constitution hasn't meant anything since FDR decided to crap all over it. The last 8 years simply reinforced that opinion.

QuakerOats wrote: decision in the history of U.S. jurisprudence --


http://blog.heritage.org/2009/11/19/morning-bell-a-historically-bad-decision/
“The U.S. Constitution protects American citizens and visitors from the moment they are suspected of criminal wrongdoing through a potential trial. These same protections are not, have never, and should not be granted to enemy combatants in war,…”


And then we have this:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=116552



Ladies and gentlemen, we have elected the enemy!