Pryor "I want to leave a legacy (at OSU) That's why I'm staying four years"

College Sports 130 replies 4,480 views
thedynasty1998's avatar
thedynasty1998
Posts: 6,844
Aug 12, 2010 4:45pm
Mohican00;449379 wrote:Right, cause he could not have improved his YPC against those defenses

smh

Yea, because playing against the likes of: Navy, Toledo, Illinois, New Mexico and Michigan weren't enough to improve that. SMH.
Mohican00's avatar
Mohican00
Posts: 3,394
Aug 12, 2010 5:14pm
thedynasty1998;449618 wrote:Yea, because playing against the likes of: Navy, Toledo, Illinois, New Mexico and Michigan weren't enough to improve that. SMH.

Yep, he had 3 of his best games against those teams. What better way to pad stats than against the 69th, 79th, and 94th ranked rushing defense teams he did not face
C
centralbucksfan
Posts: 5,111
Aug 12, 2010 6:18pm
Mohican00;449640 wrote:Yep, he had 3 of his best games against those teams. What better way to pad stats than against the 69th, 79th, and 94th ranked rushing defense teams he did not face

Most ANY player, great, avg or whatever does better and PAD stats against lessor competition. So that is not unusual at all. Just part of how the law of averages works out.

As for the RB situation....Saine is without question the best/experienced back overall. He is a very good receiver out of the backfield as well and has the breakaway speed that Herron lacks. I like Herron for the "tough yards" and he does tend to get better as the game goes. I am not a fan of the RB by committee...but it worked last year, and I expect to see it again this year. OSU doesn't have that big back they have had in the past. I am anxious to see Berry and I like what I have seen in Hall as well. Good to have this depth. And the competition will only push them all to get better.
thedynasty1998's avatar
thedynasty1998
Posts: 6,844
Aug 12, 2010 6:23pm
Mohican00;449640 wrote:Yep, he had 3 of his best games against those teams. What better way to pad stats than against the 69th, 79th, and 94th ranked rushing defense teams he did not face

Are you trying to defend his poor yards per carry by saying he didn't get to play against some of the worst defenses on the schedule? It is what it is. He averaged 3.9 ypc, which just isn't considered to be very good by most standards.
LJ's avatar
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Aug 12, 2010 6:28pm
like_that;449029 wrote:True Pryor story:

Walks into some party, and the first thing he says when he enters the house is "Who here wants to fuck me?" Some girl approaches him, and they go upstairs to a bedroom.


True story.

WHO WANT TO SEX MUTUMBO???
Mohican00's avatar
Mohican00
Posts: 3,394
Aug 12, 2010 9:10pm
thedynasty1998;449684 wrote:Are you trying to defend his poor yards per carry by saying he didn't get to play against some of the worst defenses on the schedule? It is what it is. He averaged 3.9 ypc, which just isn't considered to be very good by most standards.

I'm not trying to defend his actual ypc for the season - it is what it is. However, I feel that if he had played in the three games he missed against subpar rushing defenses, he would have improved his overall average. IMO
Mohican00's avatar
Mohican00
Posts: 3,394
Aug 12, 2010 9:13pm
centralbucksfan;449683 wrote:Most ANY player, great, avg or whatever does better and PAD stats against lessor competition. So that is not unusual at all. Just part of how the law of averages works out.
I don't know how this comment contributes to anything mentioned earlier but thanks for the input.