Stunning.
...and true.BGFalcons82;1151020 wrote:Stunning...
Article with more detail:superman;1152243 wrote:http://dailycaller.com/2012/04/25/rural-kids-parents-angry-about-labor-dept-rule-banning-farm-chores/
Is this Obama's plan to create more jobs for illegals, in order to keep their votes?
Ya think?Manhattan Buckeye;1152339 wrote:....but still scary what this nation has become, we've collectively lost our minds.
These moronic politicians are always looking for a scapegoat and Big Oil is one of their favorites.QuakerOats;1152952 wrote:http://cnsnews.com/blog/craig-bannister/epa-officials-philosophy-oil-companies-crucify-them-just-romans-crucified
As I have been saying ............ beyond belief.
Government backs off:superman;1152243 wrote:http://dailycaller.com/2012/04/25/rural-kids-parents-angry-about-labor-dept-rule-banning-farm-chores/
Is this Obama's plan to create more jobs for illegals, in order to keep their votes?
Research from the Federal Reserve finds that that since 1947, when two-quarter annualized real GDP growth falls below 2 percent, recession follows within a year 48% of the time. In other words, the U.S. economy may be entering a red zone where if anything at all goes wrong—like, say, a worsening EU economy and financial situation—it will lack the momentum to avoid another downturn. Indeed, Strategas Research thinks corporate profits may have declined on a quarterly basis for the first time since 2008.
And yet, there are tens of millions that will stand proudly behind his disaster of an economic policy, his disdain for growth, his hatred of the successful and vote for him again. This proves once again the definition of insanity.And even if nothing else goes wrong, growth still looks to be exceptionally weak for the third year of a recovery. This is the 11th quarter of the Obama Recovery. Over that span, the economy has grown 7% total. During the first 11 quarters of the Reagan Recovery, the economy grew 18%, more than twice as much as the Obama Recovery.
LOL.gut;1150936 wrote:Funny, I don't care how many books you've read when you clearly didn't understand the material. Reading a book doesn't mean you learned anything, as you demonstrate over and over again on this board. I mean, I could read every medical text ever written and it's not going to qualify me to give medical advice, much less perform surgery.
The video is latent with opinionated falsehoods...motivated by political agendas. For example, one would have to be the most naive to believe that unbridled free markets led to the explosion of the middle class (as stated in the video). Because simply....it didn't. 20th Century America was the bastion economically in raising all ships. The same time frame illustrated the greatest positive interventions which directly led to the booming economy shared by the masses.
If McCain had been elected, the economy would have been exponentially worse. Now I can't prove that, of course. But this is what I would envision under McCain.BGFalcons82;1155972 wrote: And yet, there are tens of millions that will stand proudly behind his disaster of an economic policy, his disdain for growth, his hatred of the successful and vote for him again. This proves once again the definition of insanity.
Republicans have a track record of having higher deficits than Obama? Interesting observation, but the facts don't agree with you.Footwedge;1156093 wrote:If McCain had been elected, the economy would have been exponentially worse. Now I can't prove that, of course. But this is what I would envision under McCain.
War in southern Russia which je promoted.
War with Iran
Remaining troops in Iraq
Expansion in Afghan
Expansion in Pakistan
Invasion of Yeman
Invasion in Somalia
Expansion of the fraudulent banking ponzi schemes...resulting in more fed. bailouts.
Ramped up Patriot Act.
Deficit spending even higher than Obama's. Republicans have a track record in doing so.
Further tax decreases...resulting in less revenues...not more.
I doubt Romney gets elected...but if he does...I will pop my popcorn and enjoy watching the clusterfukk unfold.
I think if McCain would have won that we'd all have magic unicorns as pets and basements full of cash.Footwedge;1156093 wrote:If McCain had been elected, the economy would have been exponentially worse. Now I can't prove that, of course. But this is what I would envision under McCain.
War in southern Russia which je promoted.
War with Iran
Remaining troops in Iraq
Expansion in Afghan
Expansion in Pakistan
Invasion of Yeman
Invasion in Somalia
Expansion of the fraudulent banking ponzi schemes...resulting in more fed. bailouts.
Ramped up Patriot Act.
Deficit spending even higher than Obama's. Republicans have a track record in doing so.
Further tax decreases...resulting in less revenues...not more.
I doubt Romney gets elected...but if he does...I will pop my popcorn and enjoy watching the clusterfukk unfold.
They base it off of % increases, the kind of fuzzy math liberals favor to mask the cost of unsustainable social programs (like Repubs do with defense spending, just to keep this bipartisan :laughjmog;1156182 wrote:Republicans have a track record of having higher deficits than Obama? Interesting observation, but the facts don't agree with you.
As if the past 4 years has been paradise?Footwedge;1156093 wrote:I doubt Romney gets elected...but if he does...I will pop my popcorn and enjoy watching the clusterfukk unfold.
In a perverted sort of way, for many, apparently so. Misery loves company.believer;1156316 wrote:As if the past 4 years has been paradise?
You cannot:BGFalcons82;1156155 wrote: is a stagnant economy with insufficient growth to create new jobs, a hidden inflation (thanks to hand-in-hand monetary policy with Helicopter Ben) that has seen the price of gasoline rise over 100% in just over 3 years, and historic deficits for the next decade.
Given the landscape of the 2008/2009 transition...i.e. depression part 2, McCain would have deficit spent more than Obama did....jmog;1156182 wrote:Republicans have a track record of having higher deficits than Obama? Interesting observation, but the facts don't agree with you.
The misery index has shown no partisan favorites since 1948, as show in the following link.gut;1156338 wrote:In a perverted sort of way, for many, apparently so. Misery loves company.
I thought only chicken hawks started wars.Footwedge;1156093 wrote:War in southern Russia which je promoted.
War with Iran
Remaining troops in Iraq
Expansion in Afghan
Expansion in Pakistan
Invasion of Yeman
Invasion in Somalia