Disgusted With Obama Administration.

Home Archive Politics Disgusted With Obama Administration.
believer's avatar

believer

Senior Member

8,153 posts
Feb 23, 2012 6:09 PM
Devils Advocate;1094000 wrote:Our per capita income is almost 2 times what it is in Greece.... What's your point?
Yeah...I guess that means we should spend ourselves into financial oblivion twice as fast.
Feb 23, 2012 6:09pm
BGFalcons82's avatar

BGFalcons82

Senior Member

2,173 posts
Feb 23, 2012 6:32 PM
believer;1094042 wrote:Yeah...I guess that means we should spend ourselves into financial oblivion twice as fast.
We must dig deeper and faster in order for the Obama utopia to get it's roots. ;)
Feb 23, 2012 6:32pm
believer's avatar

believer

Senior Member

8,153 posts
Feb 23, 2012 8:05 PM
BGFalcons82;1094061 wrote:We must dig deeper and faster in order for the Obama utopia to get it's roots. ;)
Admit it. You stole that line from Boatshoes!
Feb 23, 2012 8:05pm
F

Footwedge

Senior Member

9,265 posts
Feb 23, 2012 8:31 PM
derek bomar;1092949 wrote:nice deflection. I'll be waiting for someone to tell me why this is a bad idea.
No one from the right will. Whenever Obama pulls a conservative ploy, the haters will never be able to accept and applaud. I proved that over the previous 2 pages.

BTW, it's a great idea. Why didn't Bush the 43rd think of it?
Feb 23, 2012 8:31pm
believer's avatar

believer

Senior Member

8,153 posts
Feb 23, 2012 8:34 PM
Footwedge;1094189 wrote:No one from the right will. Whenever Obama pulls a conservative ploy, the haters will never be able to accept and applaud.
It IS a great political ploy by the Bammer in an election year. I'll give him that much.
Feb 23, 2012 8:34pm
F

Footwedge

Senior Member

9,265 posts
Feb 23, 2012 8:41 PM
believer;1094193 wrote:It IS a great political ploy by the Bammer in an election year. I'll give him that much.
Ah yes....yes indeed. "He's only acting conservative because it's election year" schtic. LOL. Why would he be promoting conservative line of economic reasoning during election year? Why is that? Maybe because it is overall good for the country? Nah, that can't be it. He's a Marxist and a Socialist...forgot about that.

And again...just a simple plan it is....why didn't Bush the 43rd think of it? With his conservative brain and all?
Feb 23, 2012 8:41pm
Cleveland Buck's avatar

Cleveland Buck

Troll Hunter

5,126 posts
Feb 23, 2012 9:08 PM
Cutting the tax rate and eliminating loopholes is fine. He's not going to eliminate them all though. His buddies will still get their tax credits. To me it is irrelevant. It isn't going to solve any of our problems or increase revenues. Obama is just showing how absurd the Republican economic plans are (except Ron Paul's) where they think tinkering with the tax code is going to solve everything and boom the economy.

Tinkering with the tax rate doesn't accomplish anything in a macro sense. Every dollar spent by the federal government is a tax. They either tax us now, tax us later, or print the money and suck that out of all of us. Someone could come in and not cut tax rates at all, but cut $1 trillion in spending and that would be a major tax cut.
Feb 23, 2012 9:08pm
believer's avatar

believer

Senior Member

8,153 posts
Feb 23, 2012 9:20 PM
Footwedge;1094199 wrote:And again...just a simple plan it is....why didn't Bush the 43rd think of it? With his conservative brain and all?
If it's so simple, why didn't the Anointed One introduce it before ObamaKare, the $780 billion Porkulus Sammich, etc.? Oh that's right, it's 2012.
Feb 23, 2012 9:20pm
believer's avatar

believer

Senior Member

8,153 posts
Feb 23, 2012 9:25 PM
Footwedge;1094199 wrote:And again...just a simple plan it is....why didn't Bush the 43rd think of it? With his conservative brain and all?
If it's so simple, why didn't the Anointed One introduce it before ObamaKare, the $780 billion Porkulus Sammich, etc.? Oh that's right, it's 2012 AND when all else fails, blame Bush.
Feb 23, 2012 9:25pm
Cleveland Buck's avatar

Cleveland Buck

Troll Hunter

5,126 posts
Feb 23, 2012 9:50 PM
Here's what we need to get the economy going.
Since at this point US society is irrevocably split into two camps, on one hand those who believe Keynesian propaganda, where the only cure for unsustainable debt is more debt, and on the other those who believe that a return to a gold standard is the only way to prevent an epic socio-political collapse, also known in official US circles as "extremists", and since we know that the status quo will never let the latter get their way without a fight (quite literally and quite violently), it is only logical that 'if you can't beat them you have to join them'. In which case we believe that instead of breaking windows, or starting wars, or even expecting a growth boosting alien invasion that would lead to a surge in GDP that may or may not come, one should not only go for broke, but do so in style. As such we propose that the US, already the world's most expansionist and aggressive foreign policy power, not like there is anything wrong with that of course - it is all for the sake of liberating oppressed foreign oil, should one up itself and build the true symbol of its contemporary socio-historical status: the Imperial Death Star. Yet the real benefit in addition to blowing up various alien world that refuse to bail out the world's central bank confederacy, is that the cost of construction of said Keynesian masterpiece, would be an epic $852 quadrillion, which in turn would go straight to US GDP.
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/modest-proposal-boost-us-gdp-852-quadrillion-build-imperial-death-star
Feb 23, 2012 9:50pm
IggyPride00's avatar

IggyPride00

Senior Member

6,482 posts
Feb 24, 2012 3:40 PM
Just think, you don't just get to fire obama in November, you get to fire this nut job and others like him:

http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/...es_631859.html
Not so fast. Willard will hire carbon copies of Geithner, who along with BHO he supported.

[video=youtube;GarlPplc_xk][/video]
Feb 24, 2012 3:40pm
S

stlouiedipalma

Senior Member

1,797 posts
Feb 24, 2012 11:34 PM
QuakerOats;1094833 wrote:Just think, you don't just get to fire obama in November, you get to fire this nut job and others like him:

http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/geithner-privilege-being-american-why-rich-need-higher-taxes_631859.html

Good luck getting that done. If the "final four" is all you've got, you'd better start planning for the 2016 election.
Feb 24, 2012 11:34pm
believer's avatar

believer

Senior Member

8,153 posts
Feb 25, 2012 2:49 AM
stlouiedipalma;1095169 wrote:Good luck getting that done. If the "final four" is all you've got, you'd better start planning for the 2016 election.
The Final Four - like it or not - are far better alternatives than what we're dealing with now. That's the unfortunate reality.
Feb 25, 2012 2:49am
I

I Wear Pants

Senior Member

16,223 posts
Feb 25, 2012 4:10 AM
believer;1095250 wrote:The Final Four - like it or not - are far better alternatives than what we're dealing with now. That's the unfortunate reality.
We will continue to disagree here on all of them but Paul.

If it's Santorum/Newt vs Obama and I didn't have a choice of write ins/3rd party I take Obama. Romney vs Obama is stupid because both of them are robots that talk to the base/wackos of their party but usually end up supporting solutions that are more towards the center but also usually pretty shitty.
Feb 25, 2012 4:10am
believer's avatar

believer

Senior Member

8,153 posts
Feb 25, 2012 6:50 AM
I Wear Pants;1095258 wrote:We will continue to disagree here on all of them but Paul.

If it's Santorum/Newt vs Obama and I didn't have a choice of write ins/3rd party I take Obama. Romney vs Obama is stupid because both of them are robots that talk to the base/wackos of their party but usually end up supporting solutions that are more towards the center but also usually pretty shitty.
It's very, very simple for me...anyone but Obama.
Feb 25, 2012 6:50am
Belly35's avatar

Belly35

Elderly Intellectual

9,716 posts
Feb 25, 2012 7:03 AM
I Wear Pants;1095258 wrote:We will continue to disagree here on all of them but Paul.

If it's Santorum/Newt vs Obama and I didn't have a choice of write ins/3rd party I take Obama. Romney vs Obama is stupid because both of them are robots that talk to the base/wackos of their party but usually end up supporting solutions that are more towards the center but also usually pretty shitty.
Just so I understand your process: You vote for Obama who has given (your words) "shitty" agenda that is proving to be a failure for America rather than vote for some else. So once you taste shitty you keep eating it.. :D
Feb 25, 2012 7:03am
believer's avatar

believer

Senior Member

8,153 posts
Feb 25, 2012 7:13 AM
Belly35;1095266 wrote:Just so I understand your process: You vote for Obama who has given (your words) "shitty" agenda that is proving to be a failure for America rather than vote for some else. So once you taste shitty you keep eating it.. :D
As long as Big Government keeps telling liberals that the shit sandwich tastes great, they'll keep coming back to the feeding trough if there's plenty of Kool Aid to wash it down. ;)
Feb 25, 2012 7:13am
G

gut

Senior Member

15,058 posts
Feb 25, 2012 8:06 AM
believer;1095269 wrote:As long as Big Government keeps telling liberals that the **** sandwich tastes great, they'll keep coming back to the feeding trough if there's plenty of Kool Aid to wash it down. ;)
Taco Bell serves millions each year.

But, you know, I once ate at a Taco Bell that served Coke instead of Pepsi. That was fucked up.
Feb 25, 2012 8:06am
believer's avatar

believer

Senior Member

8,153 posts
Feb 25, 2012 8:41 AM
gut;1095284 wrote:Taco Bell serves millions each year.

But, you know, I once ate at a Taco Bell that served Coke instead of Pepsi. That was fucked up.
Methinks you are referring to the nutrition portion of the ObamaKare plan. :D
Feb 25, 2012 8:41am
bases_loaded's avatar

bases_loaded

Senior Member

6,912 posts
Feb 25, 2012 11:15 AM
Four US soldiers have been killed since the book burning that O has come out and apologized for. For some reason the MSM headlines call them NATO soldiers though....while technically correct, it is a clear sign of who's side they are on.
Feb 25, 2012 11:15am
ptown_trojans_1's avatar

ptown_trojans_1

Moderator

7,632 posts
Feb 25, 2012 11:59 AM
bases_loaded;1095349 wrote:Four US soldiers have been killed since the book burning that O has come out and apologized for. For some reason the MSM headlines call them NATO soldiers though....while technically correct, it is a clear sign of who's side they are on.
U.S. forces are under the banner of ISAF, and have since 2002. What's your point?
The news calls them U.S./ NATO soldiers interchangeably, but over the past the news has called the U.S. soldiers killed, U.S. soldiers. You are making a mountain out of a mole hill.

And yes that was a huge failure over there.
NATO is now pulling some forces out of Kabul as a result.

Post script: Yeah crazy MSM headlines: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/26/world/asia/afghanistan-koran-burning-protests-enter-fifth-day.html

As to the Final Four, Romney is the only one I would even think about voting for, but his foreign policy is still a little too neocon for me.
Feb 25, 2012 11:59am
BGFalcons82's avatar

BGFalcons82

Senior Member

2,173 posts
Feb 25, 2012 12:00 PM
Belly35;1095266 wrote:Just so I understand your process: You vote for Obama who has given (your words) "shitty" agenda that is proving to be a failure for America rather than vote for some else. So once you taste shitty you keep eating it.. :D
Post of the week.
Feb 25, 2012 12:00pm
Q

QuakerOats

Senior Member

8,740 posts
Feb 26, 2012 10:59 AM
believer;1095269 wrote:As long as Big Government keeps telling liberals that the **** sandwich tastes great, they'll keep coming back to the feeding trough if there's plenty of Kool Aid to wash it down. ;)

American liberals are just like the Greeks, they live in fantasy land and, when told their dependency checks are going to start bouncing, they throw temper tantrums and arrogantly blame others for not providing enough. Gee, sounds like they take their cue from the activist at 1600 Penn Ave.
Feb 26, 2012 10:59am
ptown_trojans_1's avatar

ptown_trojans_1

Moderator

7,632 posts
Feb 26, 2012 11:09 AM
QuakerOats;1096178 wrote:American liberals are just like the Greeks, they live in fantasy land and, when told their dependency checks are going to start bouncing, they throw temper tantrums and arrogantly blame others for not providing enough. Gee, sounds like they take their cue from the activist at 1600 Penn Ave.
We are not Greece.
If the U.S. is Greece, then so is every other economy in the world....which is not accurate.
Feb 26, 2012 11:09am