Lawrence Taylor Indicted in NY.

Home Archive Serious Business Lawrence Taylor Indicted in NY.
E

enigmaax

Senior Member

4,511 posts
Jun 23, 2010 12:27 PM
Didn't you ever hear about this around the time it happened? He didn't pay for sex. He paid $300 to a girl that he didn't have sex with and she said that they did so her pimp wouldn't beat her up again.
Jun 23, 2010 12:27pm
tk421's avatar

tk421

Senior Member

8,500 posts
Jun 23, 2010 12:28 PM
Uh huh, right. You don't get indicted by a Grand Jury without some proof there was a crime.
Jun 23, 2010 12:28pm
E

enigmaax

Senior Member

4,511 posts
Jun 23, 2010 12:28 PM
He's a hall of famer. What he says has to be true.
Jun 23, 2010 12:28pm
G

gut

Senior Member

15,058 posts
Jun 23, 2010 1:15 PM
tk421;398578 wrote:Uh huh, right. You don't get indicted by a Grand Jury without some proof there was a crime.

Not true, at least in cases of sexual assault. Cases can and have been tried on the word of the alleged victim alone, though you probably still need an admission of consensual sex from the accused without physical evidence. Although if LT denied having sex and is being charged with rape I assume they have some DNA. The prostitution thing is pretty much a slam dunk because I think he admitted to that.
Jun 23, 2010 1:15pm
ZWICK 4 PREZ's avatar

ZWICK 4 PREZ

Senior Member

7,733 posts
Jun 23, 2010 1:16 PM
tk421;398578 wrote:Uh huh, right. You don't get indicted by a Grand Jury without some proof there was a crime.

Probable Cause.


Burden of proof is in the Petit Jury.


You don't technically need any proof to be indicted.
Jun 23, 2010 1:16pm
darbypitcher22's avatar

darbypitcher22

Senior Member

8,000 posts
Jun 23, 2010 1:17 PM
From what the guy on ESPN is saying right now, the fact that the girl was underage and he didn't know that is pretty much irrelivant.

Basically from what I'm gathering, he's fucked.
Jun 23, 2010 1:17pm
tk421's avatar

tk421

Senior Member

8,500 posts
Jun 23, 2010 2:03 PM
darbypitcher22;398644 wrote:From what the guy on ESPN is saying right now, the fact that the girl was underage and he didn't know that is pretty much irrelivant.

Basically from what I'm gathering, he's fucked.
Correct. Which I honestly think is a bullshit law. A girl can look like she is 25 and lie to you to your face that she is 25, but if she turns out to be underage, you're fucked. Just as an example.
Jun 23, 2010 2:03pm
Websurfinbird's avatar

Websurfinbird

Chosen Person

656 posts
Jun 23, 2010 2:12 PM
Just follow this sage advice:

If a woman tells you she's 20 and looks 16.. she's 12
If she tells you she's 26, and LOOKS 26.. she's damn near 40
Jun 23, 2010 2:12pm