data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3c720/3c720713309565290093c7c5427fae69f1a24947" alt="KnightRyder's avatar"
KnightRyder
Posts: 1,428
Jul 7, 2010 3:33pm
georgemc80;414173 wrote:alright KR, I have enjoyed your pointless ramblings and stupid comments, but now you have crossed the line. All I have to say is 4,256. (what embarassing loss to Texas are you referring?)
Back to the topic....
I don't like USC releasing Henderson from his letter of intent. This kid and his wannabe hip hop dad knew the chances and pick LA anyways. This was a good chance to teach him a life lesson. Oh well, I guess we will see if he warrants the hype in the shoe this fall.
maybe you should pay closer attention. big gain mentioned some embarrassing loss that texas had. i really dont know what he is talking about as far as that goes. maybe you try asking him.
B
Big Gain
Posts: 2,073
Jul 7, 2010 8:36pm
KnightRyder;414406 wrote:maybe you should pay closer attention. big gain mentioned some embarrassing loss that texas had. i really dont know what he is talking about as far as that goes. maybe you try asking him.
The only reason you don't know what I'm taking about is because you are IGNORANT, uneducated, fail to do reasearch, talk out of your ass and unknowledgeable concerning college football.
We all know you are ignorant, it's painfully obvious. With that being said, you have just proven that you're EXTREMELY IGNORANT. SO ignorant, you have no memory of the last BCS Championship game from 6 months ago. If you ignorantly call Ohio State's 3 point loss to a favored Texas an "embarrassing" loss and a 3 point loss to a favored USC an "embarrassing" loss, what would you call the Texas 16 point loss to Alabama from only SIX MONTHS ago??? Even Ohio State's 14 point loss to LSU isn't as embarrassing as Texas' 16 point loss to Alabama. According to you, any team who loses by a field to to a favored team has an "embarrassing" loss. STUPID!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
YOU ARE ONE TRULY IGNORANT INDIVIDUAL. YOU are the "embarrassment". Every time you make another uneducated post. EVERY POST.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3c720/3c720713309565290093c7c5427fae69f1a24947" alt="KnightRyder's avatar"
KnightRyder
Posts: 1,428
Jul 7, 2010 9:29pm
Big Gain;414937 wrote:The only reason you don't know what I'm taking about is because you are IGNORANT, uneducated, fail to do reasearch, talk out of your ass and unknowledgeable concerning college football.
We all know you are ignorant, it's painfully obvious. With that being said, you have just proven that you're EXTREMELY IGNORANT. SO ignorant, you have no memory of the last BCS Championship game from 6 months ago. If you ignorantly call Ohio State's 3 point loss to a favored Texas an "embarrassing" loss and a 3 point loss to a favored USC an "embarrassing" loss, what would you call the Texas 16 point loss to Alabama from only SIX MONTHS ago??? Even Ohio State's 14 point loss to LSU isn't as embarrassing as Texas' 16 point loss to Alabama. According to you, any team who loses by a field to to a favored team has an "embarrassing" loss. STUPID!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
YOU ARE ONE TRULY IGNORANT INDIVIDUAL. YOU are the "embarrassment". Every time you make another uneducated post. EVERY POST.
inow that shows who really is dumb ass here , did you forget that colt mc coy a hiesman candidate and starting quarterback for was injured and lost for damn near all of the game and that texas was forced to user a freshamn qb. i would hardly call that a emabarrassment. what is a embarrassment is that you would even comment on that game. thats show you truly are the weakest link. just typical of the buckeye homers when they got dismantled by fla. all everyone heard coming from the buckeye faithful was if ginn wouldnt have gotten hurt it would have been different . YOU SIR ARE IDIOT. and calling you a idiot is probably a insult to idiots.
B
Big Gain
Posts: 2,073
Jul 8, 2010 1:05am
KnightRyder;415023 wrote:inow that shows who really is dumb ass here , did you forget that colt mc coy a hiesman candidate and starting quarterback for was injured and lost for damn near all of the game and that texas was forced to user a freshamn qb. i would hardly call that a emabarrassment. what is a embarrassment is that you would even comment on that game. thats show you truly are the weakest link. just typical of the buckeye homers when they got dismantled by fla. all everyone heard coming from the buckeye faithful was if ginn wouldnt have gotten hurt it would have been different . YOU SIR ARE IDIOT. and calling you a idiot is probably a insult to idiots.
SO, the most IGNORANT person in the history of this site is the "embarrassing" loss expert. The year before, Colt McCoy played the entire BCS game against Ohio State and favored Texas won by a field goal and you, the ignorant one, called that an "embarrassing" loss for Ohio State. AGAIN and AGAIN and AGAIN... every time you open your mouth you prove your IGNORANCE. Only someone as IGNORANT as you wants it both ways, his way, no other way. An ugly mouthed, hater, loser, jealous IGNORANT "embarrassment".
MORE proof of your uneducated IGNORANCE in this post alone:
"inow", "(a) dumb ass", "here , did", "mc coy", "hiesman", "starting quarterback for ( ) was", "texas", "forced to user", "freshamn", "i", "emabarrassment", "fla.", "thats show,", "just", "ginn", "wouldnt", "YOU SIR ARE () IDIOT". "a idiot" ......TWENTY - ONE grammatical errors in one short post.
A RECORD for uneducated ignorance on here. Does mommy know her 5th grader is using her computer?
MORE proof of your debate losing IGNORANCE. You avoid answering pertinent questions. Since you are so ignorant I will ask the questions ONE MORE TIME.
1) Explain how you can call Ohio State's 3 point loss to favored USC an "embarrassing" loss?
2) Explain how you can call Ohio State's 3 point loss to favored Texas an "embarrassing" loss?
Since you have a hater fixation about "embarrassments" in BCS games, why no mention of the following. A further avoidance and no explanation for each will further PROVE your IGNORANCE.
VA Tech's "embarrassing" 16 point loss to Florida State.
Florida State's "embarrassment" of scoring only 2 points against Oklahoma.
Nebraska's "embarrassing" 23 point loss to Miami.
#1 ranked, defending BCS Champion, 34 consecutive win streak, PROHIBITIVE favorite Miami's "embarrassing" 7 point loss to Ohio State who NO ONE picked to win.
Oklahoma's 36 point "embarrassing" loss to USC.
#1 Oklahoma's "embarrassing" 14 point loss to Florida.
Are you aware that in half of the BCS Title games the favored team lost? How "embarrassing".
We await your answers, if there are no intelligent answers forthcoming(free of uneducated grammatical errors), you will have admitted to being nothing more than an IGNORANT HATER.
B
Big Gain
Posts: 2,073
Jul 8, 2010 1:48am
Anyone with the screen name Knight Ryder that makes ignorant, uneducated, grammatically horrid posts is obviously an uneducated hill billy who thinks renting Ryder trucks makes him an entrepreneurial genius.KnightRyder;412858 wrote:anyone with the screen name charliehustle shouldnt throw stones. the man was criminal. so how fucking retarded are you?
Q
queencitybuckeye
Posts: 7,117
Jul 8, 2010 6:25am
Big Gain;415300 wrote:Anyone with the screen name Knight Ryder that makes ignorant, uneducated, grammatically horrid posts is obviously an uneducated hill billy who thinks renting Ryder trucks makes him an entrepreneurial genius.
Hillbilly is one word.
T
TheMightyGators
Posts: 438
Jul 8, 2010 7:12am
Big Gain;413599 wrote:If you weren't so ignorant you would know that ALL 3-Star, 4-Star and 5-Star HS football players are offered scholarships LONG before they graduate from high school. If you weren't so ignorant you would know there have been many athletes that have been shot and received athletic scholarships. If you weren't so ignorant you would know that there have been THOUSANDS upon THOUSANDS of athletes that couldn't qualify (one reason being they didn't graduating from high school on time) that attend Junior Colleges to get their academics in order so they can fulfill the scholarship offered. Only those as ignorant as you make assumptions as to who are "homers". You are by far the most ignorant person on here.
Don't be ridiculous. You know as well as everyone else that Sleeper takes that crown.
T
TheMightyGators
Posts: 438
Jul 8, 2010 7:16am
Big Gain;415282 wrote:SO, the most IGNORANT person in the history of this site is the "embarrassing" loss expert. The year before, Colt McCoy played the entire BCS game against Ohio State and favored Texas won by a field goal and you, the ignorant one, called that an "embarrassing" loss for Ohio State. AGAIN and AGAIN and AGAIN... every time you open your mouth you prove your IGNORANCE. Only someone as IGNORANT as you wants it both ways, his way, no other way. An ugly mouthed, hater, loser, jealous IGNORANT "embarrassment".
MORE proof of your uneducated IGNORANCE in this post alone:
"inow", "(a) dumb ass", "here , did", "mc coy", "hiesman", "starting quarterback for ( ) was", "texas", "forced to user", "freshamn", "i", "emabarrassment", "fla.", "thats show,", "just", "ginn", "wouldnt"......SIXTEEN grammatical errors in one short post.
A RECORD for uneducated ignorance on here. Does mommy know her 5th grader is using her computer?
MORE proof of your debate losing IGNORANCE. You avoid answering pertinent questions. Since you are so ignorant I will ask the questions ONE MORE TIME.
1) Explain how you can call Ohio State's 3 point loss to favored USC an "embarrassing" loss?
2) Explain how you can call Ohio State's 3 point loss to favored Texas an "embarrassing" loss?
Since you have a hater fixation about "embarrassments" in BCS games, why no mention of the following. A further avoidance and no explanation for each will further PROVE your IGNORANCE.
VA Tech's "embarrassing" 16 point loss to Florida State.
Florida State's "embarrassment" of scoring only 2 points against Oklahoma.
Nebraska's "embarrassing" 23 point loss to Miami.
#1 ranked, defending BCS Champion, 34 consecutive win streak, PROHIBITIVE favorite Miami's "embarrassing" 7 point loss to Ohio State who NO ONE picked to win.
Oklahoma's 36 point "embarrassing" loss to USC.
#1 Oklahoma's "embarrassing" 14 point loss to Florida.
Are you aware that in half of the BCS Title games the favored team lost? How "embarrassing".
We await your answers, if there are no intelligent answers forthcoming(free of uneducated grammatical errors), you will have admitted to being nothing more than IGNORANT HATER.
I'm not sure, but maybe he was talking about the other USC game were OSU lost by 30 some points.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/96ac2/96ac2fc0769c74cd59206b2c9a0e45f4fccdd29d" alt="thedynasty1998's avatar"
thedynasty1998
Posts: 6,844
Jul 8, 2010 9:12am
Big Gain is at it again. Good to see his vocabulary hasn't expanded.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3c720/3c720713309565290093c7c5427fae69f1a24947" alt="KnightRyder's avatar"
KnightRyder
Posts: 1,428
Jul 8, 2010 9:20am
TheMightyGators;415346 wrote:I'm not sure, but maybe he was talking about the other USC game were OSU lost by 30 some points.
that was the game i was talking about, the one big gain would like to forget. well if you asked him it didnt happen. and as far as va tech, fsu, nebraska, and all the other that were mentioned. i didnt see anyone calling those teams the pinnacle of success. so those games and teams are irrelevant. what was the buckeyes ranking when they got destroyed by florida? after all they are the "pinnacle of successs" they should have one hands down. but i will say this when colt mc coy went down and left the game that was a big loss for texas. mc coy could arguably the best qb ever to play at texas. but did texas quit? no they hung around and made it a little interesting. they didnt fold their tents and go home. they showed heart , i tip my hat to texas for that.so that loss was hardly embarrassing. and as far as OSU 3 pt loss to texas yea it was embarrassing , because all i heard from buckeye nation is how OSU was gonna beat them by 14. and the loss to LSU the buckeyes were never really a threat to win that game after the half. and the usc game was basically name the score for usc.
C
centralbucksfan
Posts: 5,111
Jul 8, 2010 10:54am
KnightRyder;415423 wrote: i didnt see anyone calling those teams the pinnacle of success. .
Hmm, maybe because your NOT TROLLING round on their message boards stirring the pot as you do here. Wow..the continued ignorance and jealousy is comical.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3c720/3c720713309565290093c7c5427fae69f1a24947" alt="KnightRyder's avatar"
KnightRyder
Posts: 1,428
Jul 8, 2010 11:06am
centralbucksfan;415582 wrote:Hmm, maybe because your NOT TROLLING round on their message boards stirring the pot as you do here. Wow..the continued ignorance and jealousy is comical.
actually i did look at their message board and i didnt see it. wow... the continued arrogance and short sightedness is comical.
V
vball10set
Posts: 24,795
Jul 8, 2010 11:06am
don't waste your time,cbf--the guys' a frickin' retard...
C
centralbucksfan
Posts: 5,111
Jul 8, 2010 11:16am
KnightRyder;415594 wrote:actually i did look at their message board and i didnt see it. wow... the continued arrogance and short sightedness is comical.
LOL...uh huh, sure you did. Now your not only a troll, but a liar as well. And please don't make me go to those boards and make you look even more ignorant. Just let it go for now....you don't want to bury yourself anymore then you already have.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3c720/3c720713309565290093c7c5427fae69f1a24947" alt="KnightRyder's avatar"
KnightRyder
Posts: 1,428
Jul 8, 2010 12:06pm
centralbucksfan;415601 wrote:LOL...uh huh, sure you did. Now your not only a troll, but a liar as well. And please don't make me go to those boards and make you look even more ignorant. Just let it go for now....you don't want to bury yourself anymore then you already have.
now thats funny , who are you miss cleo? like you know what i did. go ahead look around other messages boards and show me where one of their poster called thier team the pinnacle of success. you are the quintessential buckeye fan . you bash other programs but cant take it when somebody bashs your bucks. and doesnt see them as some football juggernaut. i dont see you calling buckeye fans out when they out and out lie. the only football you know is the substandard football played in the big ten. if the big ten is so great , and the buckeyes are the top of the heap in the big ten. when was the last time OSU has beaten a sec team in a bowl game? were you even born then. i know michigan has done it and penn state too. but your bucks couldnt even beat lowly south carolina.
C
centralbucksfan
Posts: 5,111
Jul 8, 2010 12:52pm
KnightRyder;415668 wrote:now thats funny , who are you miss cleo? like you know what i did. go ahead look around other messages boards and show me where one of their poster called thier team the pinnacle of success. you are the quintessential buckeye fan . you bash other programs but cant take it when somebody bashs your bucks. and doesnt see them as some football juggernaut. i dont see you calling buckeye fans out when they out and out lie. the only football you know is the substandard football played in the big ten. if the big ten is so great , and the buckeyes are the top of the heap in the big ten. when was the last time OSU has beaten a sec team in a bowl game? were you even born then. i know michigan has done it and penn state too. but your bucks couldnt even beat lowly south carolina.
Hmm, where have I bashed another program, one that wasn't deserving of being bashed? USC deserves everything they are getting. And anyone who who has been on JJhuddle as well as on here, certainly knows I call out my fellow fans, and have been highly critical of player actions along with Tressel decisions.
You on the other hand, are a POS IMO. YOu spend all your time on here doing nothing but bashing OSU. So negative...how sorry I feel for you that you can't be a positive person and enjoy things for what they are. But no, you just spend your lonely ass days on here ripping on OSU and their fans. Certainly a big sign of jealousy and insecurty issues.
If you really believe OSU fans are any different then other highly successful programs....then you are flat out as ignorant as you sound on here.
As far as last time OSU beat an SEC team...who really gives a rats ass. If thats the ONLY thing you can continue to hang your hat on....then thats pretty lame IMO.
If you really want to get into this and that...I'd be happy to start talking about OVERALL national titles, all americans, Heisman winners, tradition etc, etc. The only SEC team that can sniff what OSU has done traditionally is Bama.
Anyway, enough of you. I once learned when you argue witn an idiot, and a stranger walks by...they see two idiots. So I am walking away from the idiot now. Have a good day.
BTW..who is your team?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/952f4/952f48c68a77f58aaa2b184e42d03f71935c97c7" alt="karen lotz's avatar"
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Jul 8, 2010 12:55pm
centralbucksfan;415762 wrote:So I am walking away from the idiot now. Have a good day.
BTW..who is your team?
LOL I guess I will be the stranger in this scenario.
B
Big Gain
Posts: 2,073
Jul 8, 2010 1:10pm
KnightRyder;415668 wrote:now thats funny , who are you miss cleo? like you know what i did. go ahead look around other messages boards and show me where one of their poster called thier team the pinnacle of success. you are the quintessential buckeye fan . you bash other programs but cant take it when somebody bashs your bucks. and doesnt see them as some football juggernaut. i dont see you calling buckeye fans out when they out and out lie. the only football you know is the substandard football played in the big ten. if the big ten is so great , and the buckeyes are the top of the heap in the big ten. when was the last time OSU has beaten a sec team in a bowl game? were you even born then. i know michigan has done it and penn state too. but your bucks couldnt even beat lowly south carolina.
Oh IGNORANT one...these are questions you have failed to answer. Could it be due to your IGNORANCE? Answer these questions, if not you admit to being IGNORANT.
Of 120 schools what percentage of that number do you deem to be at or very near to "pinnacle" programs? Surely there must be more than one.
Who are the schools YOU purport to having or very close to having a "pinnacle" program?
According to you, because of your hate and jealousy, we all know you do not consider Ohio State in this category. You also have told us you eliminate Va Tech, Florida State, Miami, Texas and Oklahoma. YOUR criteria is over the past 10 years. By my estimation that leaves 4 potential candidates.
Answer the following questions, if you fail to answer ONCE AGAIN you will admit to being IGNORANT.
If over the past 10 years a school has had records of 8-5, 8-5, 7-5, and 9-4 could they be a "pinnacle" program?
If a school has only ONE Conference Title in in the past 10 years could they have a "pinnacle" program?
If a school has only 3 Conference Titles in the past 18 years, the past 2 years had records of 8-5 and 9-3 and 6 out of the past 10 years has lost between 3 and 5 games, could they be considered a "pinnacle" program?
If over the past 10 years a school had a year with a record of 9-5, if over the past 10 years a school tied for 5th in their league, if over the past 10 years a school has a season with no wins. If over the past 10 years a school lost to the wost team west of the Mississippi River, could they be considered a "pinnacle" program?
If over the past 10 years a school has more BCS Titles except for one school out of 120 in the country, if over the past 10 years a school has been to more BCS Title Games except for one school out of 120 in the country, if that school has won the past 6 Conference Titles in a row, should they be considered to having at or near a "pinnacle" program?
BTW IGNORANT ONE, you have overwhelming set a new IGNORANCE record for this site in your last post. It had THIRTY ONE grammatical errors. You are BY FAR THE MOST IGNORANT individual I have every seen, ANYWHERE.
B
Big Gain
Posts: 2,073
Jul 8, 2010 2:02pm
According to Spell Check hill billy is acceptable.queencitybuckeye;415342 wrote:Hillbilly is one word.
S
sjmvsfscs08
Posts: 2,963
Jul 8, 2010 2:16pm
That's because hill and billy are each words too. It's like how dumb and ass make dumbass...
B
Big Gain
Posts: 2,073
Jul 8, 2010 2:16pm
OH, the game when Freshman Terrell Pryor was thrown to the wolves. The USC team that beat Virginia 52-7, Oregon 44-10, Arizona State 28-0, Washington State 69-0, Washington 56-0, Stanford 45-23, ND 38-3, UCLA 28-7, Penn State 38-28.TheMightyGators;415346 wrote:I'm not sure, but maybe he was talking about the other USC game were OSU lost by 30 some points.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7c31a/7c31a46af98d5764bc2053a6a365e2674a9a9cf7" alt="derek bomar's avatar"
derek bomar
Posts: 3,722
Jul 8, 2010 2:21pm
Big Gain;415908 wrote:According to Spell Check hill billy is acceptable.
this post is either epic in its sarcasm or lacks all logic
B
Big Gain
Posts: 2,073
Jul 8, 2010 2:25pm
sjmvsfscs08;415939 wrote:That's because hill and billy are each words too. It's like how dumb and ass make dumbass...
Which is more insulting? It's OK not to answer, thereby not admitting to......
B
Big Gain
Posts: 2,073
Jul 8, 2010 2:40pm
thedynasty1998;415418 wrote:Big Gain is at it again. Good to see his vocabulary hasn't expanded.
If you mean pointing out THE most IGNORANT, uneducated, ugly mouthed, jealous, hater on here...... I plead guilty. You think otherwise?!?!?!?
You are correct, my vocabulary has remained consistent, unlike the following from this thread alone.
fucking scum bag
bullshit
fuck'em
fuck you
shit
go get bent
my ass
fucking joke
douche-bag
you're an idiot
douchers
ounce of brain
you're a pussy
go fuck yourself
douchebaggery
STFU
jibbering idiot
suck each others dicks
dumbass
your father is your uncle
fucking retarded
Coming from expanded vocabularies Dynasty fails to have a problem with.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3c720/3c720713309565290093c7c5427fae69f1a24947" alt="KnightRyder's avatar"
KnightRyder
Posts: 1,428
Jul 8, 2010 3:38pm
Big Gain;415807 wrote:Oh IGNORANT one...these are questions you have failed to answer. Could it be due to your IGNORANCE? Answer these questions, if not you admit to being IGNORANT.
Of 120 schools what percentage of that number do you deem to be at or very near to "pinnacle" programs? Surely there must be more than one.
Who are the schools YOU purport to having or very close to having a "pinnacle" program?
According to you, because of your hate and jealousy, we all know you do not consider Ohio State in this category. You also have told us you eliminate Va Tech, Florida State, Miami, Texas and Oklahoma. YOUR criteria is over the past 10 years. By my estimation that leaves 4 potential candidates.
Answer the following questions, if you fail to answer ONCE AGAIN you will admit to being IGNORANT.
If over the past 10 years a school has had records of 8-5, 8-5, 7-5, and 9-4 could they be a "pinnacle" program?
If a school has only ONE Conference Title in in the past 10 years could they have a "pinnacle" program?
If a school has only 3 Conference Titles in the past 18 years, the past 2 years had records of 8-5 and 9-3 and 6 out of the past 10 years has lost between 3 and 5 games, could they be considered a "pinnacle" program?
If over the past 10 years a school had a year with a record of 9-5, if over the past 10 years a school tied for 5th in their league, if over the past 10 years a school has a season with no wins. If over the past 10 years a school lost to the wost team west of the Mississippi River, could they be considered a "pinnacle" program?
If over the past 10 years a school has more BCS Titles except for one school out of 120 in the country, if over the past 10 years a school has been to more BCS Title Games except for one school out of 120 in the country, if that school has won the past 6 Conference Titles in a row, should they be considered to having at or near a "pinnacle" program?
BTW IGNORANT ONE, you have overwhelming set a new IGNORANCE record for this site in your last post. It had THIRTY ONE grammatical errors. You are BY FAR THE MOST IGNORANT individual I have every seen, ANYWHERE.
BIG NOTHIN ,