Ford Leads Surge in Quality

Home Archive Serious Business Ford Leads Surge in Quality
ernest_t_bass's avatar

ernest_t_bass

12th Son of the Lama

24,984 posts
Jun 21, 2010 8:13 AM
Yawn. I'm a Honda man, through and through.... however... I would buy the new Taurus in a heartbeat! One of the nicest looking cars I've ever seen.
Jun 21, 2010 8:13am
justincredible's avatar

justincredible

Nick Mangold

32,056 posts
Jun 21, 2010 9:45 AM
FORD is indeed the GOAT.

And, yeah, the new Taurus is awesome. I badly want the SHO.
Jun 21, 2010 9:45am
ernest_t_bass's avatar

ernest_t_bass

12th Son of the Lama

24,984 posts
Jun 21, 2010 9:56 AM
Ford is on the up-and-up, but they are farrr from GOAT.
Jun 21, 2010 9:56am
justincredible's avatar

justincredible

Nick Mangold

32,056 posts
Jun 21, 2010 9:57 AM
ernest_t_bass;395969 wrote:Ford is on the up-and-up, but they are farrr from GOAT.

Okay.
Jun 21, 2010 9:57am
ernest_t_bass's avatar

ernest_t_bass

12th Son of the Lama

24,984 posts
Jun 21, 2010 10:04 AM
justincredible;395970 wrote:Okay.

Whatever, dude.
Jun 21, 2010 10:04am
dwccrew's avatar

dwccrew

Not Banned

7,817 posts
Jun 21, 2010 10:13 AM
After the last couple of years I will from now on be a Ford driver. Ford is most certainly the top automaker out there.
Jun 21, 2010 10:13am
gerb131's avatar

gerb131

Senior Member

9,932 posts
Jun 21, 2010 10:16 AM
The new Taurus is sweet looking although I have yet to see the SHO model on the road at least.
Jun 21, 2010 10:16am
G

gut

Senior Member

15,058 posts
Jun 21, 2010 10:29 AM
The meaningful gap in quality was closed several years ago. Yes, the foreign makes scored higher but if you could attach a real, as opposed to perceived, value on that gap it was insignificant. Of course, something to be said about perception, as always.

IMO, design has hurt the Big 3 more than anything in recent years. Anything they made that wasn't a truck or SUV was just ugly for so long with few exceptions. But it's nice to see they can now point to factual evidence of the closing of the quality gap to start changing perception.

Still, i don't know what the current cost per vehicle gap now is after all the recent restructuring, but when you have a $2000 per vehicle cost disadvantage and the big 3 were selling something like 9 million vehicles a year you see why they couldn't make a proft => that added up to $18B a year, folks.
Jun 21, 2010 10:29am