j_crazy
Posts: 8,372
Jun 15, 2010 4:48pm
i think that solves the missouri debate. they wouldn't give up the money to keep texas if they had plans of leaving anyway.
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Jun 15, 2010 5:40pm
FairwoodKing;388266 wrote:Listen asshole, I got my original info from KOMO4 news in Seattle. They got it from the Austin paper.
We will just have to wait until Tuesday to see who's right.
You wrong playa
lhslep134
Posts: 9,774
Jun 15, 2010 7:27pm
FairwoodKing;388266 wrote:Listen asshole, I got my original info from KOMO4 news in Seattle. They got it from the Austin paper.
We will just have to wait until Tuesday to see who's right.
Uhm, it's not you LOLZZZZZ
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Jun 15, 2010 8:04pm
lhslep134;390677 wrote:Uhm, it's not you LOLZZZZZ
pot meeting kettle
lhslep134
Posts: 9,774
Jun 15, 2010 8:43pm
karen lotz;390720 wrote:pot meeting kettle
If you're referring to my failed Thad thread, at least the information I reported literally came right from the source.
Like I've said 19082098509850932485 times to the idiots like you who can't comprehend that college kids change their mind:
COLLEGE KIDS CHANGE THEIR MIND, ESPECIALLY WHEN LOTS OF MONEY IS INVOLVED.
Hm, make sense now?
Go back to your bridge troll.
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Jun 15, 2010 8:50pm
I was just pointing out the irony there, no need to get your panties in a bunch. It is alright for you to LOLZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ at someone for being wrong but not vice versa? Who cares where you got your information, you were still wrong. For that...LOLZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
E
enigmaax
Posts: 4,511
Jun 15, 2010 9:02pm
lhslep134;390770 wrote:If you're referring to my failed Thad thread, at least the information I reported literally came right from the source.
Like I've said 19082098509850932485 times to the idiots like you who can't comprehend that college kids change their mind:
COLLEGE KIDS CHANGE THEIR MIND, ESPECIALLY WHEN LOTS OF MONEY IS INVOLVED.
Hm, make sense now?
Go back to your bridge troll.
You will NEVER ..... EHHHHHHHHHHHHHVER ..... live that down.
But in your defense, who the fuck cares. The fact you were wrong then doesn't change the truth of your statement on this thread.
lhslep134
Posts: 9,774
Jun 15, 2010 9:04pm
karen lotz;390784 wrote:I was just pointing out the irony there, no need to get your panties in a bunch. It is alright for you to LOLZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ at someone for being wrong but not vice versa? Who cares where you got your information, you were still wrong. For that...LOLZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
There's no irony. I accepted I was wrong, and admitted it.
There would be irony if I never did that, and then point out when someone is wrong.
lhslep134
Posts: 9,774
Jun 15, 2010 9:05pm
enigmaax;390810 wrote:You will NEVER ..... EHHHHHHHHHHHHHVER ..... live that down.
But in your defense, who the fuck cares. The fact you were wrong then doesn't change the truth of your statement on this thread.
Dude, I don't plan on living it down haha at this point it's just funny how wrong I was. Even funnier that I made the thread about 6 hours before he said he was leaving because it was the first time I was on a comp since the Rose Bowl.
se-alum
Posts: 13,948
Jun 15, 2010 9:33pm
j_crazy;390563 wrote:i think that solves the missouri debate. they wouldn't give up the money to keep texas if they had plans of leaving anyway.
I think they just kept their options open, as there was no guarantee they would/will get an invite from the Big Ten. This way, if they don't get an invite, they're still in good standing with the Big 12, and if they do get an invite, they will recover some of that money by accepting.
krambman
Posts: 3,606
Jun 15, 2010 11:47pm
se-alum;390852 wrote:I think they just kept their options open, as there was no guarantee they would/will get an invite from the Big Ten. This way, if they don't get an invite, they're still in good standing with the Big 12, and if they do get an invite, they will recover some of that money by accepting.
I think that this new TV contract basically makes it impossible for any of these schools to leave for the next 10 years until the contract is up. I heard that the financial loss would be too great for any school to leave. My guess is that Missouri either got tired of waiting or got pissed that they were told they would get an invite then got passed up by the Big Ten in favor of other schools, so they decided they were done with the Big Ten.
Speedofsand
Posts: 5,529
Jun 16, 2010 12:44am
FairwoodKing was right at the moment. He had links. Many of us were right and 10 minutes later we were wrong about all the back and forth changing events. The past week was wild in NCAA football.
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Jun 16, 2010 2:35pm
ESPN back at it...Reporting that Utah will join the PAC 10 and the announcement will come this Friday.
atomica600
Posts: 242
Jun 16, 2010 4:49pm
^^^ I had the same kind of feeling when I saw it. I will believe that Utah is joining the Pac10 when they actually have the press conference.
Sykotyk
Posts: 1,155
Jun 16, 2010 11:59pm
ESPN has done some underhanded things in all this. The most damning being the claim that they were joining the PAC-10 while the network was talking behind closed doors with the Big XII teams about how much money they'd get if they stuck together. Yet, not once was any of those backroom deals ever mentioned on ESPN's "news" shows.
Sykotyk
Sykotyk