data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/debfe/debfee8d962d933ab0876806b9e23816d20dc7b2" alt="OneBuckeye's avatar"
OneBuckeye
Posts: 5,888
Aug 24, 2010 9:56am
My completely uniformed projection
2010 Football Schedule
08/27 H West Holmes - W
09/03 A Orrville - L
09/10 H Waynedale - W
09/17 H Tuslaw - W
09/24 H CVCA- L
10/01 A Indian Valley - W
10/08 A Manchester - L
10/15 H Tusky Valley - W
10/22 A Fairless - W
10/29 H Timken - W
7-3
2010 Football Schedule
08/27 H West Holmes - W
09/03 A Orrville - L
09/10 H Waynedale - W
09/17 H Tuslaw - W
09/24 H CVCA- L
10/01 A Indian Valley - W
10/08 A Manchester - L
10/15 H Tusky Valley - W
10/22 A Fairless - W
10/29 H Timken - W
7-3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eaea8/eaea801aee701e7434b6c3a32e51ba19016a9d50" alt="THE4RINGZ's avatar"
THE4RINGZ
Posts: 16,816
Aug 24, 2010 10:05am
Pretty fair assesment. I would say they go 8-2. Probably win the CVCA game. And hopefully at least one of the Orrville or Manchester games.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/debfe/debfee8d962d933ab0876806b9e23816d20dc7b2" alt="OneBuckeye's avatar"
OneBuckeye
Posts: 5,888
Aug 24, 2010 10:23am
^ How would you rank the opponents on the schedule?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eaea8/eaea801aee701e7434b6c3a32e51ba19016a9d50" alt="THE4RINGZ's avatar"
THE4RINGZ
Posts: 16,816
Aug 24, 2010 10:41am
Good question........ I would rank them as follows: (and this is just my opinion)....
1. Orrville
2. Manchester
3. CVCA
4. Tusky Valley
5. Tuslaw
6. Waynedale
7. West Holmes
8. Indian Valley
9. Fairless
10. Timken
1. Orrville
2. Manchester
3. CVCA
4. Tusky Valley
5. Tuslaw
6. Waynedale
7. West Holmes
8. Indian Valley
9. Fairless
10. Timken
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3540a/3540ae59f1cc871569c0f6b09e870105fd427bf7" alt="thePITman's avatar"
thePITman
Posts: 3,867
Aug 24, 2010 11:36am
1. Orrville
2. Manchester
3. CVCA
4a. Waynedale
4b. Tusky Valley
6. Tuslaw
7. Indian Valley
8. West Holmes
9. Timken
10. Fairless
2. Manchester
3. CVCA
4a. Waynedale
4b. Tusky Valley
6. Tuslaw
7. Indian Valley
8. West Holmes
9. Timken
10. Fairless
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/debfe/debfee8d962d933ab0876806b9e23816d20dc7b2" alt="OneBuckeye's avatar"
OneBuckeye
Posts: 5,888
Aug 24, 2010 12:52pm
Interesting. It is surprising that west holmes has been so bad for so long and apparently they aren't getting better.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eaea8/eaea801aee701e7434b6c3a32e51ba19016a9d50" alt="THE4RINGZ's avatar"
THE4RINGZ
Posts: 16,816
Aug 24, 2010 1:04pm
I wouldn't say WH isn't getting any better. First year head coach this season brings a ton of excitement to the program. From what I understand hiis first year or so will be an uphill battle, after he can develop his system they should be as solid as anyone else on Triway's schedule.
I do think in my ranking at least WH isn't that bad, just not as good as some of the teams ranked ahead of them.
I do think in my ranking at least WH isn't that bad, just not as good as some of the teams ranked ahead of them.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3540a/3540ae59f1cc871569c0f6b09e870105fd427bf7" alt="thePITman's avatar"
thePITman
Posts: 3,867
Aug 24, 2010 1:06pm
More interesting than the battle for the top of our schedule is the battle for the bottom. Will Timken pass somebody up? Can Fairless be that bad? (I have Timken at 9 and Fairless at 10)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eaea8/eaea801aee701e7434b6c3a32e51ba19016a9d50" alt="THE4RINGZ's avatar"
THE4RINGZ
Posts: 16,816
Aug 24, 2010 1:09pm
I had a hard time ranking #9 and #10 also. I heard Fairless is terrible from someone who saw a scrimmage, but I gave my #10 slot to Timken because well, just because. It could have gone either way.