Belly35
Posts: 9,716
Jun 8, 2010 12:03pm
Do you think that head should roll and ass kicked in the Obama Administration over this oil spill?
Has the Public Servant Clown Administration failed the American people?
Beset by problems at home and abroad Obama has come across as clinical in his response to the Gulf oil spill. But if Obama is to fulfill his bright promise of "change," failed policies should be revised. Heads should roll.
http://www.csmonitor.com/Commentary/John-Hughes/2010/0608/Gulf-oil-spill-could-mark-a-turning-point-for-Obama
http://thehill.com/blogs/e2-wire/677-e2-wire/98439-mcconnell-blames-administration-for-gulf-oil-spill
http://www.politico.com/arena/archive/whats-sestak-hiding.html
Has the Public Servant Clown Administration failed the American people?
Beset by problems at home and abroad Obama has come across as clinical in his response to the Gulf oil spill. But if Obama is to fulfill his bright promise of "change," failed policies should be revised. Heads should roll.
http://www.csmonitor.com/Commentary/John-Hughes/2010/0608/Gulf-oil-spill-could-mark-a-turning-point-for-Obama
http://thehill.com/blogs/e2-wire/677-e2-wire/98439-mcconnell-blames-administration-for-gulf-oil-spill
http://www.politico.com/arena/archive/whats-sestak-hiding.html
believer
Posts: 8,153
Jun 8, 2010 4:58pm
I don't know if heads should roll but I will admit the Anointed One is in WAY over his head.
KnightRyder
Posts: 1,428
Jun 8, 2010 9:47pm
if heads didnt roll in the past administration , they arent ever gonna roll
I
I Wear Pants
Posts: 16,223
Jun 8, 2010 9:58pm
Whose heads are we talking about?
C
captain_obvious
Posts: 82
Jun 9, 2010 12:50am
What administration? Bush's? Some did*, so now what are you going to dwell on? Let's try to concentrate on Obama's mistakes, not immediately deflect to Bush, especially when you are wrong.
*Rumsfeld, Libby, etc.
*Rumsfeld, Libby, etc.
believer
Posts: 8,153
Jun 9, 2010 4:14am
Wrong. 42 Bush Administration heads rolled....not unusual though. ALL administrations have heads roll.KnightRyder;383495 wrote:if heads didnt roll in the past administration , they arent ever gonna roll
CenterBHSFan
Posts: 6,115
Jun 9, 2010 8:17am
Sure, I think heads should roll in this administration.
Rahm Emmanuel, anyone??! If there's anybody who wouldn't want R.E. to be evicted, I sure would like to know who it is. It would be highly entertaining to learn the reasons why he should be kept.
Rahm Emmanuel, anyone??! If there's anybody who wouldn't want R.E. to be evicted, I sure would like to know who it is. It would be highly entertaining to learn the reasons why he should be kept.
martyirish
Posts: 490
Jun 9, 2010 9:08am
believer;383233 wrote:I don't know if heads should roll but I will admit the Anointed One is in WAY over his head.
The Savior has been way over his head from day one
ptown_trojans_1
Posts: 7,632
Jun 9, 2010 9:22am
ccrunner609;383982 wrote:I find it amazing how things such an oil spill in the gulf is so politicized. There isnt one person in DC that stepped foot on that rig, recieved daily updates on how that rig was doing before it blew up, made any decisions about day to day operations ect.........
100% agreed. It is extremely annoying by both sides how much politics has taken over this issue.
Belly35
Posts: 9,716
Jun 9, 2010 9:56am
ptown_trojans_1;384024 wrote:100% agreed. It is extremely annoying by both sides how much politics has taken over this issue.
I could be wrong but I think the Public Servant accelerator this to a political cluster f*** …. and now wishes he had not
ptown_trojans_1
Posts: 7,632
Jun 9, 2010 10:03am
Belly35;384073 wrote:I could be wrong but I think the Public Servant accelerator this to a political cluster f*** …. and now wishes he had not
Maybe, but both the media and the pundits are another reason for that.
I'm more concerned about fixing the problem, then the fallout can come.
Belly35
Posts: 9,716
Jun 9, 2010 10:13am
ptown_trojans_1;384081 wrote:Maybe, but both the media and the pundits are another reason for that.
I'm more concerned about fixing the problem, then the fallout can come.
Fix the probem....drill in shallow water or on land .....simple solution
Keep goverment out of the way of Business, Production and Profit ....have goverment inspector do the job and keep lobbist out of goverment.
ptown_trojans_1
Posts: 7,632
Jun 9, 2010 10:25am
Belly35;384090 wrote:Fix the probem....drill in swallow water or on land .....simple solution
Keep goverment out of the way of Business, Production and Profit ....have goverment inspector do the job and keep lobbist out of goverment.
We already drill in shallow water. As for land, I'll leave that to the locals and states.
As to government in the way, it was the lack of regulation that led to the disaster. I'm not sure I want government totally out of the way. The last 2 years have shown us what lack of regulation and oversight does.
ManO'War
Posts: 1,420
Jun 9, 2010 11:10am
I have a question that I haven't seen addressed....is this rig in International Waters? If so, what laws can the US enforce?
ptown_trojans_1
Posts: 7,632
Jun 9, 2010 11:28am
Going by the Law of the Sea definition of territorial waters, even the though the U.S. is not a party, the territorial waters are up to 13 miles, then the U.S. has about a 200 miles EEZ or Exclusive Economic Zone, which the US. has special rights over the exploration and use of marine resources.
The Deepwater Horizon was 41 miles off the coast, so within the EEZ. So, inside U.S. waters, going by the LOS.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deepwater_Horizon
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exclusive_economic_zone
The Deepwater Horizon was 41 miles off the coast, so within the EEZ. So, inside U.S. waters, going by the LOS.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deepwater_Horizon
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exclusive_economic_zone
Belly35
Posts: 9,716
Jun 9, 2010 11:40am
Was not the lack of regulation but the lack of goverment regulator doing the job and taking pay-offsptown_trojans_1;384103 wrote:We already drill in shallow water. As for land, I'll leave that to the locals and states.
As to government in the way, it was the lack of regulation that led to the disaster. I'm not sure I want government totally out of the way. The last 2 years have shown us what lack of regulation and oversight does.
ptown_trojans_1
Posts: 7,632
Jun 9, 2010 11:49am
Belly35;384180 wrote:Was not the lack of regulation but the lack of goverment regulator doing the job and taking pay-offs
Which is another way to say lack of regulation. Lack of regulation can be on both sides of the coin-the private sector is not living up to their end of regulations (which BP was not) and the public sector was not verifying or doing the correct job in regulating (which MMS was not).
Fails all around.
jhay78
Posts: 1,917
Jun 9, 2010 12:23pm
ptown_trojans_1;384024 wrote:100% agreed. It is extremely annoying by both sides how much politics has taken over this issue.
I'm with you ptown- it's way too easy politically to look at a disaster and use it to point fingers at the party-in-chief and play the blame game (i.e. Bush & Katrina).
However, what is equally annoying is those who would use the disaster (or any crisis that can't "go to waste" to quote Rahm) to advance a controversial political agenda:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/37470151/ns/politics-white_house
No it won't- not if we take advantage of energy more at home.Obama said the country's continuing dependence on fossil fuels "will jeopardize our national security
With what- plant food?it will smother our planet
Not as much as you're putting our economy at risk everyday.and will continue to put our economy and our environment at risk."
CenterBHSFan
Posts: 6,115
Jun 9, 2010 12:33pm
Can we get some other heads to roll, too? haha
Just got this about 20 minutes ago:
YouTube - Rosie O'Donnell Doubles-Down: Calls For 'Communism' In America To Confiscate Corporate Assets
Talk about nuts!
She is just one of MANY people who are just too dammed concerned with Rush Limbaugh, if you ask me!
Just got this about 20 minutes ago:
YouTube - Rosie O'Donnell Doubles-Down: Calls For 'Communism' In America To Confiscate Corporate Assets
Talk about nuts!
She is just one of MANY people who are just too dammed concerned with Rush Limbaugh, if you ask me!
Writerbuckeye
Posts: 4,745
Jun 9, 2010 6:08pm
KnightRyder;383495 wrote:if heads didnt roll in the past administration , they arent ever gonna roll
It only took 2 posts beyond the original before we get someone whining about Bush.
Pathetic.
KnightRyder
Posts: 1,428
Jun 10, 2010 11:19am
whats pathetic is 80 percent of the threads are conservatives whining about obama. you know what the rights ideas and concepts dont work. bush is proof of that.
believer
Posts: 8,153
Jun 10, 2010 4:19pm
And the Anointed One is proving that it can be exponentially worse.KnightRyder;385449 wrote:whats pathetic is 80 percent of the threads are conservatives whining about obama. you know what the rights ideas and concepts dont work. bush is proof of that.
Belly35
Posts: 9,716
Jun 10, 2010 4:24pm
OUCH! Polls show Obama should have is own head roll.......
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/06/10/fox-news-poll-white-house-moved-faster-spill/
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/06/10/fox-news-poll-white-house-moved-faster-spill/
KnightRyder
Posts: 1,428
Jun 10, 2010 4:41pm
believer;385879 wrote:And the Anointed One is proving that it can be exponentially worse.
in our mind , yea
CenterBHSFan
Posts: 6,115
Jun 10, 2010 11:15pm
KnightRyder;385449 wrote:whats pathetic is 80 percent of the threads are conservatives whining about obama. you know what the rights ideas and concepts dont work. bush is proof of that.
1. Because you would have to be a complete dunderhead to not be bitching about, at least, some of the things that Obama has/has not done.
2. You would have to be a drooling zuchinni not to bitch about some of his administrations deeds/misdeeds.
3. Just wait awhile. You'll get your turn at bitching about the next incumbent
