Movie is awful. Just plain awful. It had some good killing scenes, but the acting, the humor.... Awful, just awful.
Anyone else seen it?
Jun 7, 2010 9:39am
THE4RINGZ
R.I.P Thread Bomber
16,816posts
THE4RINGZ
R.I.P Thread Bomber
16,816
posts
Mon, Jun 7, 2010 9:46 AMJun 7, 2010 9:46 AM
I saw it. Not as great as the first one, but not terrible. Typical sequel, never as good as the original.
Jun 7, 2010 9:46am
BORIStheCrusher
drunk
1,893posts
BORIStheCrusher
drunk
1,893
posts
Mon, Jun 7, 2010 11:00 AMJun 7, 2010 11:00 AM
The first one is awful too, I don't get what all the hype is about.
Jun 7, 2010 11:00am
Manhattan Buckeye
Senior Member
M
7,566posts
M
Manhattan Buckeye
Senior Member
7,566
posts
Mon, Jun 7, 2010 11:04 AMJun 7, 2010 11:04 AM
I wouldn't go so far as calling the first one awful, but I agree I don't get what people see in it that is great. The second one was incrementally worse. The second one was cheesy, campy and over the top, but then again so was the first one. Willem Dafoe should have won a "hammy" for his overacting.
Jun 7, 2010 11:04am
ernest_t_bass
12th Son of the Lama
24,984posts
ernest_t_bass
12th Son of the Lama
24,984
posts
Mon, Jun 7, 2010 11:18 AMJun 7, 2010 11:18 AM
Better directing and acting could have obviously made either film MUCH better, but that is the story for all films.
Jun 7, 2010 11:18am
derek bomar
Senior Member
3,722posts
derek bomar
Senior Member
3,722
posts
Mon, Jun 7, 2010 12:13 PMJun 7, 2010 12:13 PM
I thought it was ok...wasn't as good as the first but not turble
