The following are simply some random thoughts that have been rattling about my head of late and that I'd like to let out -- a little house cleaning, if you will. One of the first facts we should face is that justincredible is an opportunist. That is, it is an ideological chameleon, without any real morality, without a soul. An old joke tells of the optimist who falls off a 60-story building and, as he whizzes past the 35th floor, exclaims, "So far, so good!" But it is not such blind optimism that causes justincredible's coadjutors to think that they can promote mediocrity over merit. justincredible embraces conformism with open arms. And if that seems like a modest claim, I disagree. It's the most radical claim of all.

I use such language purposefully -- and somewhat sardonically -- to illustrate how justincredible keeps trying to legitimize the fear and hatred of the privileged for the oppressed. And if we don't remain eternally vigilant, it will really succeed. No one that I speak with or correspond with is happy about this situation. Of course, I don't speak or correspond with quasi-devious, jaded rotters, justincredible's deputies, or anyone else who fails to realize that justincredible's prevarications are not an abstract problem. They have very concrete, immediate, and unpleasant consequences. For instance, solecism is not merely an attack on our moral fiber. It is also a politically motivated attack on knowledge. If you've read this far, then you probably either agree with me or are on the way to agreeing with me. Call me a cynic, but it is singularly apt that I haven't the foggiest idea why justincredible wants to rally for a cause that is completely void of moral, ethical, or legal validity. The mere mention of that fact guarantees that this letter will never get published in any mass-circulation periodical that justincredible has any control over. But that's inconsequential, because only the impartial and unimpassioned mind will even consider that the picture I am presenting need not be confined to justincredible's manifestos. It applies to everything it says and does.

What a cunning coup on the part of justincredible's slaves, who set out to overthrow democratic political systems and got as far as they did without anyone raising an eyebrow. justincredible does, occasionally, make a valid point. But when it says that it is not only acceptable, but indeed desirable, to commit confrontational, in-your-face acts of violence, intimidation, and incivility, that's where the facts end and the ludicrousness begins. justincredible loves getting up in front of people and telling them that it is the ultimate authority on what's right and what's wrong. It then boasts about how it'll impose ideology, control thought, and punish virtually any behavior it disapproves of one day. It's all part of the media spectacle that is justincredible. Of course, it soaks it up and wallows in it like a pig in mud. Speaking of pigs and mud, justincredible's worshippers claim to have no choice but to remove society's moral barriers and allow perversion to prosper. I wish there were some way to help these miserable, dim-witted dunderheads. They are outcasts, lost in a world they didn't make and don't understand. I challenge you to ponder this subject with the broadest vision possible.

At times, we all have an axe to grind. Currently, I'm grinding my axe in regards to SQ_Crazies's cajoleries. With this letter, I hope to find more constructive contexts in which to work toward resolving conflicts. But first, I would like to make the following introductory remark: SQ_Crazies has—not once, but several times—been able to support those for whom hatred has become a way of life without anyone stopping him. How long can that go on? As long as his feckless précis are kept on life support. That's why we have to pull the plug on them and call a spade a spade.

SQ_Crazies insists that our elected officials should be available for purchase by special-interest groups. Has anyone, at any time, ever been more wrong? We must truly ask ourselves questions like that before it's too late, before SQ_Crazies gets the opportunity to mobilize support for the special interests that dominate state and private activity. There is a simple answer to the question of what to do about his values. The difficult part is in implementing the answer. The answer is that we must compile readers' remarks and suggestions and use them to address the legitimate anger, fear, and alienation of people who have been mobilized by SQ_Crazies because they saw no other options for change. If he manages to lead a self-righteous jihad against those who oppose him, civilization will crumble almost immediately. Investigators from a future era will need to sift through the charred wreckage of our society looking for the black box to figure out what happened. Maybe they'll even discover that we must get people to see through the hollowness, the sham, the silliness of SQ_Crazies's flighty, unambitious hatchet jobs if we are ever to outline his troubling pattern of lying, incompetence, and carelessness. Yes, this is a bold, audacious, even unprecedented undertaking. Yes, it lacks any realistic guarantee of success. However, it is an undertaking that we must indubitably pursue because we mustn't be content to patch and darn, to piece and cobble at the worn and rotten fabric of SQ_Crazies's naive remonstrations. Instead we must stand up and fight for our heritage, traditions, and values.

SQ_Crazies has no discernible talents. The only things he has really mastered are biological functions. Well, I suppose SQ_Crazies is also good at convincing people that he's renowned for his racial and cultural sensitivity, but my point is that education is vitiated by SQ_Crazies's prophecies. To top that off, SQ_Crazies wants to sue people at random. Personally, I don't want that. Personally, I prefer freedom. If you also prefer freedom then you should be working with me to push the envelope on our knowledge of the world around us. Sorry for going on for so long about SQ_Crazies. I guess I just have a burr under my saddle from seeing him open the gates of Hell.

Got this letter in the mail recently.

This letter has three main sections. In the first, I argue that I am so mad at Ohio Chatter right now, I could spit nails. In the second, I make it clear that Ohio Chatter likes the sound of its own voice. And in the third and final section, I conclude that Ohio Chatter is so accustomed to lying about everything that it doesn't even stop to consider the consequences of its lies. In the rest of this letter, I will use history and science (in the Hegelian sense) to prove that Ohio Chatter's politics are as impractical as they are an insult to human intelligence. What do we owe Ohio Chatter? Nothing, absolutely nothing. If it claims otherwise, we have to stand firm and point out that while we do nothing, those who calumniate helpless monomaniacs are gloating and smirking. And they will keep on gloating and smirking until we investigate the development of revanchism as a concept.

Ohio Chatter apparently believes that we have too much freedom. You and I know better than that. You and I know that I sometimes ask myself whether the struggle to express my views is worth all of the potential consequences. And I consistently answer by saying that Ohio Chatter thinks I'm trying to say that one can understand the elements of a scientific theory only by reference to the social condition and personal histories of the scientists involved. Wait! I just heard something. Oh, never mind; it's just the sound of the point zooming way over Ohio Chatter's head.

Is that such a difficult concept? I have two words to say about Ohio Chatter's pranks: unforgiving poppycock. You may have noticed that Ohio Chatter's arguments are full of hair-splitting, lawyer-like quibbling, and references to obscure authorities. But you don't know the half of it. For starters, there is a format Ohio Chatter should follow for its next literary endeavor. It involves a topic sentence and supporting facts. To recapitulate, Ohio Chatter is eating our lunch.

Signed,
JJ

I Wear Pants wrote: justincredible is an opportunist.

[size=xx-large]SLURP, SLURP, SLURP[/size]

I Wear Pants wrote: But it is not such blind optimism that causes justincredible's coadjutors to think that they can promote mediocrity over merit.

[size=xx-large]SLURP, SLURP, SLURP[/size]

I Wear Pants wrote: justincredible embraces conformism with open arms.

[size=xx-large]SLURP, SLURP, SLURP[/size]

I Wear Pants wrote: justincredible does, occasionally, make a valid point.

[size=xx-large]SLURP, SLURP, SLURP[/size]

Some people just shouldn't smoke pot.

So.... justincredible is really Obama??!!

Ok so JC is really Obama.
SQ is really Rahm Emmanuel.
And Ohio Chatter is really our federal government.

I KNEW IT!!!

plagiarize much?

fashionable tarradiddle, associate

I'm fucking confused.

CenterBHSFan wrote: Ok so JC is really Obama.
SQ is really Rahm Emmanuel.
And Ohio Chatter is really our federal government.

I KNEW IT!!!

So that means I've really got some swank executive office job by being a moderator. Like Secretary of Awesomeness!

ernest_t_bass wrote: [size=xx-large]SLURP, SLURP, SLURP[/size]

I would like to maximize our individual potential for effectiveness and success in combatting Ernest_T_Bass. Before I get moving here, let me point out that if Ernest_T_Bass bites me I will bite back. He intends to create a new social class. Unsophisticated gits, maladroit foppotees, and pushy, illiberal sideshow barkers will be given aristocratic status. The rest of us will be forced into serving as their peons. As far as I can tell, I cannot believe how many actual, physical, breathing, thinking people have fallen for Ernest_T_Bass's subterfuge. I'm thoroughly stunned.

Here's an extraordinary paradox: All of the crotchety smart alecks who shouldn't be allowed to scar little children's self-image invariably want to. If we can understand what has caused the current plague of indelicate vagrants, I believe that we can then set the record straight. The suggestion that at birth every living being is assigned a celestial serial number or frequency power spectrum is wrong, absurd, and offensive. Nevertheless, Ernest_T_Bass's partisans like to suggest such things to distract attention from the truth, which is that Ernest_T_Bass lives within a self-contained atmosphere of toxic greed and covetousness. I always catch hell whenever I say something like that so let me assure you that if you want truth, you have to struggle for it. This letter represents my struggle, my attempt at taking steps toward creating an inclusive society free of attitudinal barriers. It is also my soapbox for informing the community at large that if we let Ernest_T_Bass ignore compromise and focus solely on his personal agenda, then greed, corruption, and Maoism will characterize the government. Oppressive measures will be directed against citizens. And lies and deceit will be the stock-in-trade of the media and educational institutions.

If my own experience has taught me anything, it's that Ernest_T_Bass's hypocrisy is transparent. Even the least discerning among us can see right through it. Certain facts are clear. For instance, I have observed that those who disagree with me on the next point tend to be unsophisticated and those who recognize the validity of the point to be more educated. The point is that Ernest_T_Bass says that the sky is falling. Hey, Ernest_T_Bass, how about telling us the truth for once?

If Ernest_T_Bass doesn't like it here, then perhaps he should go elsewhere. With all due respect, I recently received some mail in which the writer stated, "I'm not saying anything you don't already know about." I included that quote not because it is exceptional in any way but rather because it is typical of much of the mail I receive. I included it to show you that I'm not the only one who thinks that Ernest_T_Bass has been known to subject us to an intense barrage of misinformation, deception, and hidden propaganda. That always spurs on his lickspittles to pervert human instincts by suppressing natural, feral constraints and encouraging abnormal patterns of behavior. That, in turn, encourages Ernest_T_Bass to foster absenteeism at every opportunity. This cycle inevitably, inexorably ratchets upwards and outwards until at last some slatternly, hate-filled prevaricator winds up putting the gods of heaven into the corner as obsolete and outmoded and, in their stead, burning incense to the idol Mammon.

As someone who is working hard to direct your attention in some detail to the vast and irreparable calamity brought upon us by Ernest_T_Bass, I must point out that I cannot promise not to be angry at Ernest_T_Bass. I do promise, however, to try to keep my anger under control, to keep it from leading me—as it leads Ernest_T_Bass—to terrorize our youngsters. Do not let inflammatory rhetoric and misleading and inaccurate statements decide your position on this issue. You might have heard the story that he once agreed to help us provide a positive, confident, and assertive vision of humanity's future and our role in it. No one has located the document in which Ernest_T_Bass said that. No one has identified when or where Ernest_T_Bass said that. That's because he never said it. As you might have suspected, Ernest_T_Bass avers that the Earth is flat. As you can no doubt determine from comments like that, facts and Ernest_T_Bass are like oil and water. In closing, although this letter has been lengthy there are still a large number of comments about Ernest_T_Bass that I have had to leave aside. I didn't even begin to mention, for instance, that he frequently confuses equality of opportunity with equality of outcome. Anyway, the important point is that Ernest_T_Bass uses the term "phototelegraphically" with ostensible confidence that its meaning is universally understood.

cool story bro!

trackandccrunner wrote: cool story bro!

If I were to summarize Trackandccrunner's ridiculous crotchets I'd need only one word: birdbrained. Let me make clear what is foremost on my mind and what the focus of this letter will be: the tone of Trackandccrunner's inclinations is eerily reminiscent of that of demented scatterbrains of the late 1940s in the sense that Trackandccrunner insists that our elected officials should be available for purchase by special-interest groups. That lie is a transparent and strained effort to keep us from noticing that he is trying to brainwash us. He wants us to believe that it's psychotic to shout back at his propaganda; that's boring; that's not cool. You know what I think of that, don't you? I think that mass anxiety is the equivalent of steroids for Trackandccrunner. If we feel helpless, Trackandccrunner is energized and ramps up his efforts to put the most quasi-scurrilous thugs you'll ever see on the federal payroll.

What Trackandccrunner does in private is none of my business. But when he tries to censor by caricature and preempt discussion by stereotype, I object. I have two words for him: Grow up! Now let's have some fun and examine a few of his more ridiculous statements. First, Trackandccrunner said that everyone who doesn't share his beliefs is a pestiferous present-day robber baron deserving of death and damnation. That's rather nutty, isn't it? Later on, he claimed that he's renowned for his racial and cultural sensitivity. What this really means is that he wants to replace the search for truth with a situationist relativism based on prudish, hotheaded clericalism.

You know what I mean? If Trackandccrunner truly believes that he can achieve his goals by friendly and moral conduct, then maybe he should enroll in Introduction to Reality 101. Quite simply, he wants to be the one who determines what information we have access to. Yet Trackandccrunner is also a big proponent of a particularly disruptive form of revisionism. Do you see something wrong with that picture? What I see is that he hates it when you say that his beliefs (as I would certainly not call them logically reasoned arguments) are a crazy-quilt patchwork of the most thrasonical kinds of Lysenkoism you'll ever see. He really hates it when you say that. Try saying it to him sometime if you have a thick skin and don't mind having him shriek insults at you. Let me close by reminding you that the statements I made about Trackandccrunner in this letter are in earnest. I will not equivocate. I will not excuse. I will not retreat a single inch. And I will be heard.

Keebler wrote: I'm fucking confused.

LOL--me too..the only discernable piece of information I got out of it is that SQ_Crazie's an asshole,but we already knew that..I've got a headache :huh:

vball10set wrote: LOL--me too..the only discernable piece of information I got out of it is that SQ_Crazie's an asshole,but we already knew that..I've got a headache :huh:

I need to get something out of the way before I begin. I must say that attempts to promote the sort of behavior that would have made the folks in Sodom and Gomorrah blush are a de facto, if not a de jure, example of intellectually challenged antidisestablishmentarianism. I realize that some of you may not know the particular background details of the events I'm referring to. I'm not going to go into those details here, but you can read up on them elsewhere. VBall10set's manuscripts are not restrained by any moral scruples. No joke.

Tell vBall10set that it is indisputably not the intention of Heaven to let him make a big deal out of nothing, and you'll hear a loud "Clang!" as his mind slams shut. He doesn't want to hear that. He doesn't want to believe that the poisonous wine of barbarism had been distilled long before he entered the scene. VBall10set is merely the agent decanting the poisonous fluid from its bottle into the jug that is world humanity.

VBall10set twists every argument into some sort of "struggle" between two parties. VBall10set unvaryingly constitutes the underdog party, which is what he claims gives him the right to tell everyone else what to do. This makes me fearful that I might someday find myself in the crosshairs of his self-aggrandizing outbursts. (To be honest, though, it wouldn't be the first time.) By promoting both boosterism and Chekism, vBall10set's shenanigans are doubly crafty. This applies first and foremost to a retinue under whose conceited brand of exhibitionism the whole of honest humanity is suffering: vBall10set's army of biggety beguilers. Ancient Greek dramatists discerned a peculiar virtue in being tragic. VBall10set would do well to realize that they never discerned any virtue in being base-minded.

VBall10set's snarky cop-outs are intended to rot out the minds of all freedom-loving, free-thinking people. Once that's accomplished, he can replace such people with compliant, vBall10set-controlled, and, above all, obedient robots who would never think to initiate meaningful change. These automata will stifle the voices of those who are simply seeking to be heard in the immediate years ahead. It is probably unwise to say this loudly, but he avers that the Earth is flat. As you can no doubt determine from comments like that, facts and vBall10set are like oil and water. Consider the issue of insensate emotionalism. Everyone agrees that the issue of what to do about pestiferous schmucks is a hopelessly tangled and complicated issue, impossible to discuss due to the intensity with which each side holds its beliefs, but there are still some parasitic nonentities out there who doubt that thanks to him, we're all in a free fall into a pit of cannibalism. To them I say: You should check out some of the things he's saying about quislingism. The litany of inaccuracies, half-truths, made-up "facts", and downright falsehoods will shock you. And I won't even bother mentioning that as that last sentence suggests, you may make the comment, "What does this have to do with the worst kinds of humorless twerps I've ever seen?" Well, once you begin to see the light you'll realize that vBall10set once had the audacity to tell me that honor counts for nothing. My riposte was that the problem with him is not that he's pathological. It's that he wants to make bribery legal and part of business as usual.

VBall10set likes saying that he is entitled to force me to go into hiding. Okay, that's a parody—but not a very gross one. In point of fact, when I first became aware of vBall10set's covert invasion into our thought processes, all I could think was how vBall10set is a rambunctious varmint. In fact, vBall10set is worse than a rambunctious varmint; he's also a cuckoo lummox. That's why he feels obligated to make excessive use of foul language. VBall10set's ignorance is matched only by his arrogance. That, in itself, will condemn us to live with snooty bureaucrats when you least expect it. To close, let me accentuate that if we communicate and teach we shall not only survive vBall10set's attacks; we shall prevail.

LOL, the only thing someone got out of this is that I'm an asshole...

I Wear Pants, you're my new favorite person. At least I know all of these people are retarded.

I Wear Pants-- I feel honored--thank you...however,and you can check it out--my lack of using foul langauge has at times made me the target of ridicule...get your facts straight,brother

What
The
Fork?

SHUT THE FRONT DOOR!

Man you have alot of time on your hands!

Fab1b wrote: Man you have alot of time on your hands!

There are people I honestly despise. They lack morals, character, and honesty. They degrade, divide, and destroy our nation. In case you can't tell, I'm talking about Fab1b here. Let me begin by observing that the proverbs of Theognis, like those of Solomon, are observations on human nature, ordinary life, and civil society, with moral reflections on the facts. I quote him as a witness of the fact that Fab1b's most progressive idea is to tip the scales in his favor. If that sounds progressive to you, you must be facing the wrong way. Given his propensity for repression in the service of paradigmatic integrity, it is little wonder that he and his encomiasts are a bunch of sciolists. As you know, sciolists are skinheads; skinheads are cads; cads are skinflints; and skinflints all want to paint pictures of pathological worlds inhabited by the most stubborn clunks you'll ever see. The point is that Fab1b is the picture of the insane person on the street, babbling to a tree, a wall, or a cloud, which cannot and does not respond to his histrionics.

It may be a bit gauche to mention this, but Fab1b's press releases are a hotbed of terrorism. The facts are indisputable, the arguments are impeccable, and the consequences are undeniable. So why does Fab1b think that there won't be any blowback from his establishing rack-and-thumbscrew programs? To answer that question, we need first to consider Fab1b's thought process, which generally takes the following form: (1) Those who disagree with Fab1b should be cast into the outer darkness, should be shunned, should starve, so (2) he can make all of our problems go away merely by sprinkling some sort of magic, pink, pixie dust over everything that he considers litigious or larcenous. Therefore, (3) favoritism and opportunism are identical concepts and thus, (4) superstitious-to-the-core buggers are easily housebroken. As you can see, Fab1b's reasoning makes no sense, which leads me to believe that in the Old Testament, the Book of Kings relates how the priests of Baal were slain for deceiving the people. I'm not suggesting that there be any contemporary parallel involving Fab1b, but Fab1b has warned us that in the blink of an eye, devious, satanic bozos will revile everything in the most obscene terms and drag it into the filth of the basest possible outlook. If you think about it, you'll realize that Fab1b's warning is a self-fulfilling prophecy in the sense that many people are convinced that Fab1b is doing some serious mau-mauing. I can't comment on that, but I can say that he is absolutely vulgar, as he has proved to my complete satisfaction. Rather than respond to my letters with reasoned arguments, Fab1b prefers to call evil good and good evil. Although this method of attack is unparalleled in any other sphere of literary controversy it does prove that there is no excuse for the innumerable errors of fact, the slovenly and philistine artistic judgments, the historical ineptitude, the internal contradictions, and the various half-truths, untruths, and gussied-up truths that litter every one of Fab1b's essays from the first word to the last.

If Fab1b thinks that he can make me burst into tears then he's barking up the wrong tree. So what if he hates me for pointing out that he fears nothing more than the exposure of his motives and activities? Let him hate me. I consider such hatred a mark of honor, a mark of distinction. Whenever he tries to fortify our feeble spirits with a few rehearsed words of bravado, I can't help but think that if he opened his eyes, he'd realize that his sentiments are amalgams of popular themes among primitive grifters, sententious, squalid busybodies, and pesky polemics. Fab1b wants nothing other than absolute ideological and moral lockdown. I will now cite the proof of that statement. The proof begins with the observation that if the people generally are relying on false information sown by obstinate, counterproductive prima donnas of one sort or another, then correcting that situation becomes a priority for the defense of our nation.

For the sake of the universe, I hope that this is the only planet that contains sleazy pseudo-intellectuals like Fab1b. He is not only repugnant, but he also lacks the self-control necessary to conform his behavior to reasonable norms. At this point in the letter, I'd like to categorize for you some of his pranks. Unfortunately, they're far too pestiferous and baleful to fit neatly into any single, overarching framework, so the best I can do is to convey the message that Fab1b has announced his intentions to accelerate our descent into the cesspool of sensationalism. While doing so may earn Fab1b a gold star from the mush-for-brains ethnocentrism crowd, he has been using all sorts of jiggery-pokery to convince people that science is merely a tool invented by the current elite to maintain power. That worldview may be appealing, at least to materialistic braggarts, but it severely limits our national conversation on critical policy issues. Perhaps more painfully, Fab1b has long wanted to prevent anyone from stating publicly that his little schemes are bound to fail. Why do I bring that up? Because by studying his repression of ideas in its extreme, unambiguous form one may more clearly understand why I once read an article about how Fab1b wants nothing less than to reward those who knowingly or unknowingly play along with his undertakings while punishing those who oppose them. It was the powerful and long-lingering momentum of the impressions received on that occasion, more than any other circumstance, that gave definite form and resolution to my purpose of freeing Fab1b's mind from the constricting trammels of irrationalism and the counterfeit moral inhibitions that have replaced true morality.

We should not concern ourselves with Fab1b's putative virtue or vice. Rather, we should concern ourselves with our own welfare and with the fact that Fab1b, who has posed as Savior of the World, is nothing else but the world's seducer, its destroyer, its incendiary, and its executioner. Now that's a strong conclusion to draw just from the evidence I've presented in this letter so let me corroborate it by saying that we must refute Fab1b's arguments line-by-line and claim-by-claim. As mentioned above, however, that is not enough. It is necessary to do more. It is necessary to take off the kid gloves and vent some real anger at Fab1b. Postmodernist nudniks, almost by definition, let down ladders that the wily, venal, and whiney scramble to climb. So I give you this letter. I hope it helps.

LMAO where do you get your material my friend??

Also did you call me a skinhead??