Did I miss something???

power i wrote: Did I miss something???

Writing this letter stems from a desperation to be heard, if not by a court of law, then by a court of public opinion. Let's get down to business: Power I's unruly, malign allegations flout all of society's rules. News of this deviousness must spread like wildfire if we are ever to purge the darkness from his heart. Unfortunately, power I's sinful zingers neglect to take one important factor into consideration: human nature. Unless power I has a duty to conceal the facts and lie to the rest of us, under oath if necessary, perjuring himself to help disseminate the True Faith of careerism, it is simply wrong to conclude that all it takes to solve our social woes are shotgun marriages, heavy-handed divorce laws, and a return to some mythical 1950s Shangri-la. He has been known to say that the rigors that his victims have been called upon to undergo have been amply justified in the sphere of concrete achievement. Let me interpret that for you. Power I is really saying that he intends to drive us into a state of apoplexy in a matter of days. He obviously can't come out and say it that way because too many people would realize that "power I" has now become part of my vocabulary. Whenever I see someone creating a global workers plantation overseen by transnational corporations who have no more concern for the human rights of those who produce their products or services than power I has for his chums, I tell him or her to stop "power I-ing".

My next point will be so cogent that even power I will be able to understand it. Specifically, when one examines the ramifications of letting power I influence the attitudes of dominant culture towards any environment or activity that is predominantly feebleminded, one finds a preponderance of evidence leading to the conclusion that his blockish game of chess—the blasphemous chess of irreligionism—has continued for far too long. It's time to checkmate this lascivious moocher and show him that the concepts underlying his illiterate double standards are like the Ptolemaic astronomy, which could not have been saved by positing more epicycles or eliminating some of the more glaring discrepancies. The fundamental idea—that the heavens revolve around the Earth—was wrong, just as power I's idea that he is beyond reproach is wrong. I guess I can't blame power I for wanting to quote me out of context. After all, I need your help if I'm ever to refute his arguments line-by-line and claim-by-claim. "But I'm only one person," you might protest. "What difference can I make?" The answer is: a lot more than you think. You see, if you read between the lines of power I's mind games, you'll obviously find that power I has been known to "prove" statistically that power, politics, and privilege should prevail over the rule of law. As you might have suspected, his proof is flawed. The primary problem with it is that it replaces a legitimate claim of association with an illegitimate claim of causality. Consequently, power I's "proof" demonstrates only that I cannot promise not to be angry at him. I do promise, however, to try to keep my anger under control, to keep it from leading me—as it leads power I—to maintain social control by eliminating rights and freedoms.

There are no two ways about it; I, not being one of the many dim-witted combative-types of this world, shall spare no effort to take vengeance on power I as being the fomenter of what is a universal plague throughout the civilized world. Now that that's cleared up, I'll continue with what I was saying before, that we ought to do something good for others. That'll make power I think once—I would have said "twice" but I don't see any indication that he has previously given any thought to the matter—before trying to confuse, befuddle, and neutralize public opposition. I'll go over that again: To power I's mind, Man's eternal search for Truth is a challenge to be avoided at all costs. So that means that the kids on the playground are happy to surrender to the school bully, right? No, not right. The truth is that I have no idea why power I wannabees have sprouted across the country like mushrooms after a downpour. The mere mention of that fact guarantees that this letter will never get published in any mass-circulation periodical that power I has any control over. But that's inconsequential because pharisaism is pharisaism, whether forced on us by power I or merely lauded by rapacious fast-buck artists. He will almost certainly tiptoe around that glaringly evident fact because if he didn't, you might come to realize that he sees no reason why he shouldn't grant foul chuckleheads the keys to the kingdom. It is only through an enlightened, outraged citizenry that such moral turpitude, corruption, and degradation of the law can be brought to a halt. So, let me enlighten and outrage you by stating that you shouldn't let power I intimidate you. You shouldn't let him push you around. We're the ones who are right, not power I. To sum it all up, power I is afraid of change.

Fab1b wrote: LMAO where do you get your material my friend??

I'd love to find out his source on these "letters" also...you just plug in a name and away you go--good stuff

Alrighty then.

Some of these things are just minutes apart. I'm both impressed and bewildered.

^^^you're next,bro

This is not from his mind, he is using a generator for this as someone has pointed out to me.

Before I Wear Pants starts ripping tendons and ligaments with his typical knee-jerk reaction to my letters, he should realize that his activities are filled with a number of very clear-cut and blatant lies—lies of both omission and commission. It may help if I begin my discussion by relating an innocuous story in order to illustrate my point: A few days ago I was arguing with a particularly whiney, primitive money-worshipper who was insisting that I Wear Pants is as innocent as a newborn lamb. I tried to convince this repressive, mindless soi-disant do-gooder that the last time I heard I Wear Pants ramble on in his characteristically bibulous blather he said something about wanting to spread hatred, animosity, and divisiveness. I feel sorry for the human race when I hear stuff like that.

I Wear Pants maintains that honor counts for nothing. While that happens to be pure fantasy from the world of make-believe, one important fact to consider is that many people respond to his uncongenial put-downs in the same way that they respond to television dramas. They watch them; they talk about them; but they feel no overwhelming compulsion to do anything about them. That's why I insist we help people see his revolting ethics for what they are. What do you think the chances are that he will eventually stop robbing us of our lives, our health, our honor, and our belongings? I assure you, the likelihood of that is slim to none. The reason is that I Wear Pants appears committed to the proposition that his views are correct, self-evident, and based on fact and reason, while other people's positions are not just wrong but illegitimate, ideological, and unworthy of serious consideration. If you were to get a second opinion from someone who's not a member of I Wear Pants's coalition of officious swindlers and balmy barrators, however, he'd of course tell you that I don't know if I Wear Pants is consciously and purposely evil or merely harebrained. I do know, however, that he sees other people as subhuman creatures unworthy of human sympathy. And I can say that with a clear conscience because if he is victorious in his quest to make his codices a key dynamic in modern corporatism by viscerally defining "philosophicotheological" through the experience of belligerent moral relativism, then his crown will be the funeral wreath of humanity.

Lest I forget to mention this later, many people are looking for a modern-day Moses who will split the sea of materialism and build a better world, a cleaner world, a safer world, and a saner world. I can't claim that I'm the right person for the job, but I can say that I Wear Pants's disciples resist seeing that I Wear Pants's compeers are encouraged—or more aptly, dragooned—into helping I Wear Pants make bargains with the devil. They resist seeing such things because to see them, to examine them, to think about them and draw conclusions from them is to subject I Wear Pants's initiatives to the rigorous scrutiny they warrant. I've said this before, and I'll say it again, but the real question here is not, "Why does he hate our country?". The real question is rather, "When he looks in the mirror in the morning, does I Wear Pants see more than the jejune, mentally deficient face of a careless twerp?" I, hardheaded cynic that I am, would venture the answer has something to do with neopaganism. To elaborate, by the irresistible force of involuntary conviction, people everywhere will one day uplift individuals and communities on a global scale to fight for what is right. To say anything else would be a lie. Let me leave you with one last thought: This is a stark reality that no impartial analyst can choose to ignore.

GOONx19 wrote: Some of these things are just minutes apart. I'm both impressed and bewildered.

My religion has taught me not to be afraid to call someone wrong when he does something, says something, stands for something, or engages in something that violates the values in which I believe. I begin with critical semantic clarifications. First, GOONx19 sometimes puts himself in charge of consigning our traditional values to the rubbish heap of antipluralism. At other times, one of his yes-men is deputed for the job. In either case, I used to feel that GOONx19 was a mean-spirited dunce. However, after seeing how he wants to bring discord, confusion, and frustration into our personal and public lives, I now have an even lower opinion of him. In fact, I'd go so far as to say that people used to think I was exaggerating whenever I said that on many issues, discussions with GOONx19 quickly turn into fights, and dialogues soon degenerate into name-calling. After seeing GOONx19 invade every private corner and force every thought into a socially inept mold these same people now realize that I wasn't exaggerating at all. In fact, they even realize that it's my understanding that GOONx19 is fixated on terrorism. I'll say that again because I want it to sink in: GOONx19 has more understanding of beer and milk regulations than of farsighted plans for the future.

GOONx19's hypocrisy is transparent. Even the least discerning among us can see right through it. I don't see how GOONx19 can build a workable policy around wishful thinking draped over a morass of confusion (and also, as we'll see below, historical illiteracy), then impose it willy-nilly on a population by force. I'm not saying that it can't possibly be done but rather that GOONx19 can get away with lies (e.g., that the purpose of life is self-gratification) because the average person cannot imagine anyone lying so brazenly. Not one person in a hundred will actually check out the facts for himself and discover that GOONx19 is lying.

If you read between the lines of GOONx19's perceptions, you'll indubitably find that you might say, "Many of GOONx19's expostulations have been criticized for being slanted in favor of a particular stance." Fine, I agree. But there is unquestionably a directionless dimension to GOONx19's demands. Or, if "directionless" is too narrow of a term, perhaps you'd prefer "rash". In any case, if you look back over some of my older letters, you'll see that I predicted that GOONx19 would make us the helpless puppets of our demographic labels. And, as I predicted, he did. But you know, that was not a difficult prediction to make. Anyone who has bothered to learn even a little about GOONx19 could have made the same prediction. The recent outrage at GOONx19's prophecies may point to a brighter future. For now, however, I must leave you knowing that the mindless zombies who believe GOONx19's paltry story that his catch-phrases are not worth getting outraged about are also the people most likely to promote myopic ideologies such as emotionalism.

Fab1b wrote: This is not from his mind, he is using a generator for this as someone has pointed out to me.

http://www.webcitation.org/5kHjjDe6j

can't do my name gayboy.

j_crazy wrote: can't do my name gayboy.

While no statement I'm about to make should be construed as suggesting or recommending that any person commit an illegal act of any kind, you should realize that j_crazy engages in pietistic babble that nauseates even some of my more religious friends. Let's get down to brass tacks: There is something grievously wrong with those militant pissants who defy the law of the land. Shame on the lot of them! In general, I didn't want to talk about this. I really didn't. But j_crazy's bromides have kept us separated for too long from the love, contributions, and challenges of our brothers and sisters in this wonderful adventure we share together -- life! j_crazy wants all of us to believe that everything it says is entirely and absolutely true. That's why it sponsors brainwashing in the schools, brainwashing by the government, brainwashing statements made to us by politicians, entertainers, and sports stars, and brainwashing by the big advertisers and the news media.

If j_crazy is going to talk about higher standards, then it needs to live by those higher standards. I believe I have finally figured out what makes organizations like j_crazy take us over the edge of the abyss of nonrepresentationalism. It appears to be a combination of an overactive mind, lack of common sense, assurance of one's own moral propriety, and a total lack of exposure to the real world. j_crazy is bad enough when it's alone, but it is even worse when it's joined by dirty nutters. Here's some news for you: The encroachment of perverted, sullen harangues into the social fabric of our politics, our institutions, and our laws would give credence to my claim that this is nothing new. Interesting, isn't it? What you may find even more interesting is that the pen is a powerful tool. Why don't we use that tool to stop this insanity?

I have a tendency to report the more sensational things that j_crazy is up to, the more shocking things, things like how it wants to fuel inquisitions. And I realize the difficulty that the average person has in coming to grips with that, but it has the nerve to call those of us who summon up the courage to punish those who lie or connive at half-truths "conspiracy theorists". No, we're "conspiracy revealers" because we reveal that j_crazy does, occasionally, make a valid point. But when it says that it's okay if its activities initially cause our quality of life to degrade because "sometime", "someone" will do "something" "somehow" to counteract that trend, that's where the facts end and the ludicrousness begins. Much of j_crazy's behavior is not rationally calculated to be of benefit to the anti-democratic batty-types whom j_crazy claims to be trying to help. Now, that's a strong conclusion to draw just from the evidence I've presented in this letter. So let me corroborate it by saying that when a mistake is made, the smart thing to do is to admit it and reverse course. That takes real courage. The way that j_crazy stubbornly refuses to own up to its mistakes serves only to convince me that it's a pity that two thousand years after Christ, the voices of wily warped-types like it can still be heard, worse still that they're listened to, and worst of all that anyone believes them. Be always mindful that I do not have the time, in one sitting, to go into the long answer as to why as long as I live and breathe, I will strive to purge the darkness from j_crazy's heart. But the short answer is that it appears to have found a new tool to use to help it feature simplistic answers to complex problems. That tool is denominationalism, and if you watch it wield it, you'll unmistakably see why its apologists consider its belief systems a breath of fresh air. I, however, find them more like the fetid odor of alarmism. Perhaps j_crazy has never had to take a stand and fight for something as critical as our right to call for proper disciplinary action against it and its legates. But its occasional demonstrations of benevolence are not genuine. Nor are j_crazy's promises. In fact, we can divide its ideas into three categories: humorless, mutinous, and dissolute.

In hearing about j_crazy's principles, one gets the distinct impression that j_crazy and its buddies are yellow-bellied dips. This is not set down in complaint against them, but merely as analysis. I've heard j_crazy say that it is a model organization. Was that just a slip of the lip or is j_crazy secretly trying to introduce changes without testing them first? Apparently, even know-it-all j_crazy doesn't know the answer to that one. It wouldn't matter much if it did, given that it has been said that its subordinates get so hypnotized by its simplistic "good guys and bad guys" approach to history that they do not hear what j_crazy is really saying. I believe that to be true. I also believe that if you are not smart enough to realize this, then you become the victim of your own ignorance.

Now, I'm going to be honest here. If the only way to delegitimize j_crazy is for me to choke to death, then so be it. It would certainly be worth it because it is more than a purely historical question to ask, "How did its reign of terror start?" or even the more urgent question, "How might it end?". No, we must ask, "Why is it that 99 times out of 100, what it considers a fair shake, the rest of us consider a repressive, humiliating, culture-stripping experience?" First, I'll give you a very brief answer and then I'll go back and explain my answer in detail. As for the brief answer, it makes assertions that strain credulity. I'll probably devote a separate letter to that topic alone, but for now, I'll simply summarize by stating that I'm not very conversant with j_crazy's background. To be quite frank, I don't care to be. I already know enough to state with confidence that the gloss that j_crazy's allies put on j_crazy's opinions unfortunately does little to arraign it at the tribunal of public opinion. j_crazy's compeers get a thrill out of protesting. They have no idea what causes they're fighting for or against. For them, going down to the local protest, carrying a sign, hanging out with j_crazy, and meeting some other twisted politicos is merely a social event. They're not even aware that if j_crazy continues to alter, rewrite, or ignore past events to make them consistent with its current "reality", I will decidedly be obliged to do something about it. And you know me: I never neglect my obligations. I have a message for j_crazy. My message is that, for the good of us all, it should never create a kind of psychic pain at the very root of the modern mind. It should never even try to do such a resentful thing. To make myself perfectly clear, by "never", I don't mean "maybe", "sometimes", or "it depends". I mean only that I recently informed j_crazy that its vicegerents scorn and abjure reason. j_crazy said it'd "look further into the matter." Well, not too much further; after all, if it wants to complain, it should have an argument. It shouldn't just throw out the word "phenolsulphonephthalein", for example, and expect us to be scared. Thus, in summing up, we can establish the following: 1) j_crazy makes it its job to insult my intelligence, and 2) its assertion that its mistakes are always someone else's fault serves only to illustrate its ignorance and poorly hidden bigotry.

I used this web page once on jj and the moderators had a fit and ninja'd the thread.

This thread is over the line. Deleted.

It is pretty good stuff though, I had to think for a minute myself.

THE4RINGZ wrote: Some people just shouldn't smoke pot.

When I discovered he was from West Branch then it all made sense.

:idea:

THE4RINGZ wrote: Some people just shouldn't smoke pot.

On the other hand, some people should

QuakerOats wrote:

THE4RINGZ wrote: Some people just shouldn't smoke pot.

When I discovered he was from West Branch then it all made sense.

:idea:

Since when did people from West Branch get known for having a wide vocabulary like in these letters?

I figured we were still known for tractors and chewing.

Wanna go fishin? Hop in my '85 Silverado, it ain't got no muffler! We'll go to Westville, or we could get fancy and go to Berlin! Git r done!!!!

^^^ That seems more accurate of what people would say if they were trying to make fun of West Branch.

LOL, I have tons of friends that went to WB--I have it down to a science.

Heretic wrote:

CenterBHSFan wrote: Ok so JC is really Obama.
SQ is really Rahm Emmanuel.
And Ohio Chatter is really our federal government.

I KNEW IT!!!

So that means I've really got some swank executive office job by being a moderator. Like Secretary of Awesomeness!

It's YOUR movie, Heretic, direct it how ya want it!