He's dumb, poor him. He made a lot of money and did some STUPID shit all on his on. 12 cars? I don't care if he's a chocolate face from the hood, that's a stupid motha fucka right there. I'm sure a few people put one on him in the business world. It could and would happen to any of us by smarter men in the business world. That part, I kinda feel for him. But in the end, he was an idiot as much as he was a stupid guy taken advantage of.

If he would have hired a smart agent, the agent would have helped prevent this also.

I'm absolutely not arguing that he's not an idiot. In fact I believe I said he didn't have a brain in my first post. LOL

And yeah, he could have hired this person and that person--that costs money too, money that doesn't seem to be worth spending when you're stupid and you have millions throw at you all at once. And something you guys have to realize is that those financial advisors and agents are exactly who could have been taking advantage of him. It's not like they're the most ethical people in the world.

Whose arguing with you? I'm certainly not. I just added more to my initial thought.

There isn't really an argument, I just don't agree with a few of the people who said he could have just hired someone and this never would have happened.

SQ_Crazies wrote: There isn't really an argument, I just don't agree with a few of the people who said he could have just hired someone and this never would have happened.

I agree that hiring someone may not have helped him 100% and maybe he did get bent over by an agent or something that did this. I just don't know how one could be that oblivious to the amount of money they make and the amount of money they are spending.

Because they're dumb. He's a poor person with money, get what I'm saying?

SQ_Crazies wrote: Because they're dumb. He's a poor person with money, get what I'm saying?

Yes, a word comes to mind, but its racist lol.

No, it really isn't racist. Saying it's racist is like saying the term "reverse racism" makes sense.

SQ_Crazies wrote: No, it really isn't racist. Saying it's racist is like saying the term "reverse racism" makes sense.

I'm just saying that a more descriptive, one word answer would be the perfect explanation.

Agreed.


Can't wait to see us get pinned as racists over this. It WILL be hilarious, trust me.

SQ_Crazies wrote: Agreed.


Can't wait to see us get pinned as racists over this. It WILL be hilarious, trust me.

It's true. I think those people probably are skipping this thread so we are safe. Anyways, that class of people exists just like white trash.

It isn't a racism term just because it was at one time. I don't like to use it because I don't try to offend people (and regardless of how I feel, some are still offended), but when the people it's supposed to be offensive to use it more than anyone then it starts to take on a new meaning. And when you add that to the fact that racism is still alive but to a MUCH lesser degree in my generation--it's not nearly as big a deal.

SQ_Crazies wrote: It isn't a racism term just because it was at one time. I don't like to use it because I don't try to offend people (and regardless of how I feel, some are still offended), but when the people it's supposed to be offensive to use it more than anyone then it starts to take on a new meaning. And when you add that to the fact that racism is still alive but to a MUCH lesser degree in my generation--it's not nearly as big a deal.

100% agree! If they don't want us crackers saying it, they shouldn't either.