According to new Michigan AD.......UM/ND extension is NOT finalized

College Sports 74 replies 2,932 views
krambman's avatar
krambman
Posts: 3,606
May 21, 2010 8:27pm
karen lotz wrote:
Pick6 wrote: lol, notre dame fans complaining that someone wont schedule them...
the one thing i do agree on is that notre dame does have a fanbase all over the country. When I was in LA for the rose bowl, i was at a sports store in a mall and they had usc, ucla, and notre dame merchandise. Same with the pro teams for steelers..san diego, oakland, san fran, and pitt.

btw rock saying someone else cant admit when they are wrong when you cant either. you just come back with who cares????
Who is complaining Michigan won't schedule ND?

The bigger LOL is for the bucknutz who say the 3 Big Ten teams Notre Dame has long standing rivalries with should boycott them in an effort to get them to accept an invitation.
The Big Ten did that once before. It didn't work then, it won't work now. The best way for the Big Ten to strong arm ND into the conference would be to gut the Big East.
Pick6's avatar
Pick6
Posts: 14,946
May 22, 2010 11:44am
rock_knutne wrote: ^^^^^Who cares what you think, like anything you post is relevant? BTW dumb ass, UM, MSU and Purdue can walk away, ND would have NO problem replacing them!
Didnt think I ever said ND would have a problem with replacing them?
R
rock_knutne
May 22, 2010 2:11pm
^^^^^You posted that ND fans are complaining about UM not wanting to play them when that isn't the case. You have ZERO credibility!
Pick6's avatar
Pick6
Posts: 14,946
May 22, 2010 2:36pm
rock_knutne wrote: ^^^^^You posted that ND fans are complaining about UM not wanting to play them when that isn't the case. You have ZERO credibility!
LMAO. What? You arent complaining..then what did you make this thread for!
R
rock_knutne
May 22, 2010 5:23pm
^^^^^You have the brain capacity of a worm! No one's complaining you fool, I posted an article and aked why this isn't official, that's all. I don't want to see this rivalry end but ND doesn't need Michigan or any other Big 10 school if they want to back out. There's plenty of other good programs willing to sign on, ND football and it's popularity will be just fine.
S
slingshot4ever
Posts: 4,085
May 22, 2010 6:51pm
karen lotz wrote: Notre Dame/Michigan is a bigger game nationally than OSU/Michigan is.
Based on what?
karen lotz's avatar
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
May 22, 2010 7:53pm
slingshot4ever wrote:
karen lotz wrote: Notre Dame/Michigan is a bigger game nationally than OSU/Michigan is.
Based on what?
Based on whatever you want to base it on. People outside of ohio do not care about ohio state.
R
rock_knutne
May 22, 2010 8:43pm
slingshot4ever wrote:
karen lotz wrote: Notre Dame/Michigan is a bigger game nationally than OSU/Michigan is.
Based on what?
For starters, that noon kickoff time doesn't help. You'd think the Big 10 would want to put it's "crowned jewel" on prime time.
S
slingshot4ever
Posts: 4,085
May 23, 2010 10:38am
rock_knutne wrote:
slingshot4ever wrote:
karen lotz wrote: Notre Dame/Michigan is a bigger game nationally than OSU/Michigan is.
Based on what?
For starters, that noon kickoff time doesn't help. You'd think the Big 10 would want to put it's "crowned jewel" on prime time.
The Big Ten does not allow November games to be schedule in primetime. You will never see that game scheduled past a 330 start. It has also been a pretty strong tradition for as long as I can remember that the OSU UM game is played at noon. 2006 was the exception because of both teams being undefeated.

Same goes for Texas Oklahoma. That game is almost always played at noon.

Also, the Big Ten doesn't schedule the start times. All dictated by TV networks.
karen lotz's avatar
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
May 23, 2010 11:51am
So, the Big Ten doesn't schedule start times but it does have the power to say no November primetime games? Interesting.
R
rock_knutne
May 23, 2010 12:20pm
karen lotz wrote: So, the Big Ten doesn't schedule start times but it does have the power to say no November primetime games? Interesting.
This guy contradicts himself with every post.......ZERO credibility!
S
slingshot4ever
Posts: 4,085
May 23, 2010 12:59pm
rock_knutne wrote:
karen lotz wrote: So, the Big Ten doesn't schedule start times but it does have the power to say no November primetime games? Interesting.
This guy contradicts himself with every post.......ZERO credibility!
Obviously neither of you understand how game times are decided. The conferences can lay out certain rules that the networks must follow if they really want to have that conferences games on their network. The Big Ten has told all networks that they cannot schedule November games to start in primetime. It is that simple.

So in the end, I did not contradict myself, Big Ten lays out some rules but the networks decide the actual start times.
karen lotz's avatar
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
May 23, 2010 1:15pm
slingshot4ever wrote:
rock_knutne wrote:
karen lotz wrote: So, the Big Ten doesn't schedule start times but it does have the power to say no November primetime games? Interesting.
This guy contradicts himself with every post.......ZERO credibility!
Obviously neither of you understand how game times are decided. The conferences can lay out certain rules that the networks must follow if they really want to have that conferences games on their network. The Big Ten has told all networks that they cannot schedule November games to start in primetime. It is that simple.

So in the end, I did not contradict myself, Big Ten lays out some rules but the networks decide the actual start times.
Thank you for sharing your vast knowledge of how game times are decided. I don't give a fuck. You are a clown.
S
slingshot4ever
Posts: 4,085
May 23, 2010 2:19pm
Wow, good 5th grade comeback, haha. Next time don't call someone out when you don't even understand the topic being discussed.
M
Mr Pat
Posts: 519
May 23, 2010 3:30pm
Wow... Good thing we can all be adults.
R
rock_knutne
May 23, 2010 3:50pm
slingshot4ever wrote: Obviously neither of you understand how game times are decided. The conferences can lay out certain rules that the networks must follow if they really want to have that conferences games on their network. The Big Ten has told all networks that they cannot schedule November games to start in primetime. It is that simple.

So in the end, I did not contradict myself, Big Ten lays out some rules but the networks decide the actual start times.
It's obvious you CLEARLY contradicted yourself........you did post this gem, didn't you?
slingshot4ever wrote: The Big Ten does not allow November games to be schedule in primetime. You will never see that game scheduled past a 330 start. It has also been a pretty strong tradition for as long as I can remember that the OSU UM game is played at noon. 2006 was the exception because of both teams being undefeated.

Same goes for Texas Oklahoma. That game is almost always played at noon.

Also, the Big Ten doesn't schedule the start times. All dictated by TV networks.
What's it going to be........the Big 10 controls it or TV? I know, it's what ever is covenient for you to uphold your argument.:rolleyes:
B
bigkahuna
Posts: 4,454
May 23, 2010 5:00pm
I understand it fine. The Big 10 says here is what you can do.

Ok, so you can't schedule November games in primetime. Ok, well the network dicates when it can be played then. 12,1,2,3,4,5,6.

The Big Ten doesn't schedule the start times, they just say when they can be started. They give the networks a list of when games can be played, and they in turn choose which of those times will work.

It's not that hard.
S
slingshot4ever
Posts: 4,085
May 24, 2010 12:20am
^^^
Rock isn't the most intelligent. Give him a couple days to think about it.
R
rock_knutne
May 24, 2010 7:27am
^^^^^Intelligent enough to know an asshole when I see one, and clearly you fit the bill!
S
slingshot4ever
Posts: 4,085
May 24, 2010 10:35pm
That sucks that you have never actually seen me then. I guess you will never know.
R
rock_knutne
May 25, 2010 6:50am
^^^^Reading your garbage is enough to tell me!
T
Tiernan
Posts: 13,021
May 25, 2010 3:39pm
Rocky Kunt up to his old tricks again...when he clearly doesn't have a clue what he is talking about he just starts calling his intellectual superiors "assholes" or screaming "fuck you all"...etc, etc or he blocks out all contradictory opinions like he does mine. But thanks to other ND dumb asses they reply with my posts attached so my ol' pal Rocky Kunt gets to see how much I've missed his ridiculous diatribes that only reinforce the image of a knuckle dragging, slobbering river rat from Steubenville.
M
Mr Pat
Posts: 519
May 26, 2010 2:37am
Umm... OK then!
S
sjmvsfscs08
Posts: 2,963
May 26, 2010 2:43am
What's funny is that Tiernan's post was just a gigantic ad hominem attack, which he blames "Rocky Kunt" for having referred to. Not exactly proving he's intellectually superior. :s
R
rock_knutne
May 26, 2010 6:52am
^^^^He's really original, isn't he?