Most Republicans Think Obama Stole Election

Politics 57 replies 2,600 views
CenterBHSFan's avatar
CenterBHSFan
Posts: 6,115
Nov 19, 2009 9:25pm
gobuckeyes,

Sorry, but the democrats in power think that they can spend the way out of it, and that's not a change I can believe in. It doesn't make any sense.
*They ought to know better. If they want to save the day, they need to do drastic spending cuts. There's something different to do if they want to do this country good.
But, I guess that's just happy thoughts that need to be thrown right out the window. We cannot point fingers at one group with one hand, while carrying the torch in another. I am not buying it. Nobody should.
E
Elliot Stabler
Posts: 388
Nov 19, 2009 11:12pm
fish82 wrote:
Elliot Stabler wrote: Really Writer.....


Then why is it that in EVERY SINGLE POLL I have seen,

His approval rating is between 50-56%

I think he's doing a good job(not great),and will continue to improve the economy
His average is 50. Two polls have him at 46%...including the one established as the most accurate.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/president_obama_job_approval-1044.html
Who established it as the most accurate?? Republicans??

How is it that EVERY OTHER POLL on there reports him having a positive approval rating EXCEPT Fox and Rasmussen?? Hmm....
A
Altor
Posts: 62
Nov 19, 2009 11:39pm
Elliot Stabler wrote: How is it that EVERY OTHER POLL on there reports him having a positive approval rating EXCEPT Fox and Rasmussen?? Hmm....
Did you notice the "Sample" column? Rasmussen samples likely voters. Fox and Quinnipiac (who also has approval at 48%, though +6 differential) sample registered voters. Everybody else samples adults.

That explains the discrepancy.
bigdaddy2003's avatar
bigdaddy2003
Posts: 7,384
Nov 19, 2009 11:50pm
You know it's sad to think that there are people who voted for Obama simply because they wanted to make history. I never would have believed it if I didn't hear 4 or 5 people brag about it after he won.

My brother is one of the people who fell for his campaign promises and now he wishes he had his vote back. You know what they say though. Hindsight is 20/20.
LJ's avatar
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Nov 20, 2009 12:06am
instead of arguing about it, lets get some links in here with the different poll #'s
I
I Wear Pants
Posts: 16,223
Nov 20, 2009 12:25am
Here are the final polls (and a handy dandy graph for the whole campaign period) of the 2008 election. During the entire campaign there were very few polls that had Mccain as the preferred candidate and the final polls for all of the sources (which are all the major polling people/networks) had Obama leading.
fish82's avatar
fish82
Posts: 4,111
Nov 20, 2009 7:12am
Elliot Stabler wrote:
fish82 wrote:
Elliot Stabler wrote: Really Writer.....


Then why is it that in EVERY SINGLE POLL I have seen,

His approval rating is between 50-56%

I think he's doing a good job(not great),and will continue to improve the economy
His average is 50. Two polls have him at 46%...including the one established as the most accurate.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/president_obama_job_approval-1044.html
Who established it as the most accurate?? Republicans??

How is it that EVERY OTHER POLL on there reports him having a positive approval rating EXCEPT Fox and Rasmussen?? Hmm....
Dude, seriously. :rolleyes:

And you probably missed the point over the summer where FOX had him at 57-59%, often 5-6 points above everybody else.
C
cbus4life
Posts: 2,849
Nov 20, 2009 9:06am
The whole "only racists and the clueless" voted for Obama is the biggest effing cop out in the world.
W
wizecracker
Posts: 139
Nov 20, 2009 9:24am
derek bomar wrote:
Cleveland Buck wrote: I'm sure ACORN played a role, but probably not enough to make up the entire difference in votes.
prove it
Disprove it. Damn I'm full of well thought out arguments.
derek bomar's avatar
derek bomar
Posts: 3,722
Nov 20, 2009 3:05pm
wizecracker wrote:
derek bomar wrote:
Cleveland Buck wrote: I'm sure ACORN played a role, but probably not enough to make up the entire difference in votes.
prove it
Disprove it. Damn I'm full of well thought out arguments.
not really...since it's kind of hard to disprove a negative (can't disprove something where there's no actual "proof" of the thing I am trying to disprove)
believer's avatar
believer
Posts: 8,153
Nov 20, 2009 4:49pm
Gobuckeyes1 wrote:Please stop with the "only idiots and racists voted for Obama" bullshit.

If your views are indicative of the average Republican, no wonder you guys can't win an election. People are getting just a little tired of being talked down to and preached to by the Republicans who think they friggin' know it all. Your boys had six years of total control to fix everything that was wrong with our country according to them. Your party failed, and the voters went a different direction.
When someone's panties get in a wad that rapidly, it says (a) we've struck a nerve and (b) we must be dangerously close to the truth.

By the way "our boys" failed because they spent like Democrats.

The voters have lost their way.
E
Elliot Stabler
Posts: 388
Nov 20, 2009 5:17pm
Please explain how we've "lost our way"
believer's avatar
believer
Posts: 8,153
Nov 20, 2009 7:50pm
^^^Socialism is not Change We Can Believe In.
E
Elliot Stabler
Posts: 388
Nov 20, 2009 8:54pm
believer...

Do you even know what the true meaning of socialism is???

If you did...you would know that President Obama is far from being a socialist
fish82's avatar
fish82
Posts: 4,111
Nov 20, 2009 9:13pm
Elliot Stabler wrote: believer...

Do you even know what the true meaning of socialism is???

If you did...you would know that President Obama is far from being a socialist

True. "Radical Liberal" works well for me. Also, He is now below 50% in another poll you might be familiar with.

http://www.gallup.com/Home.aspx
E
Elliot Stabler
Posts: 388
Nov 20, 2009 9:51pm
http://politicalwire.com/

Putting news of President Obama's approval rate dipping below 50% in perspective, USA Today runs an excellent interactive chart plotting presidential approval rates since 1945.

When comparing various presidents to each other, as of right now, President Obama most closely tracks Ronald Reagan.

Hmm...
M
Manhattan Buckeye
Posts: 7,566
Nov 21, 2009 1:06am
I already reamed you once on this thread with that godawful initial claim and stupid "question" by the "pollsters".

I do like the Hmm, though. Barack, Obama, hmm hmm hmm, unemployment is here to stay!
believer's avatar
believer
Posts: 8,153
Nov 21, 2009 3:58am
Elliot Stabler wrote:http://politicalwire.com/

Putting news of President Obama's approval rate dipping below 50% in perspective, USA Today runs an excellent interactive chart plotting presidential approval rates since 1945.

When comparing various presidents to each other, as of right now, President Obama most closely tracks Ronald Reagan.

Hmm...
Obama is no Reagan.
fish82's avatar
fish82
Posts: 4,111
Nov 21, 2009 7:24am
Elliot Stabler wrote: http://politicalwire.com/

Putting news of President Obama's approval rate dipping below 50% in perspective, USA Today runs an excellent interactive chart plotting presidential approval rates since 1945.

When comparing various presidents to each other, as of right now, President Obama most closely tracks Ronald Reagan.

Hmm...
Except for the constant girl-like whining about "my predecessor" and "we inherited," yeah....he's totally Reaganesque. :rolleyes:

Cool tangent though.
LJ's avatar
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Nov 21, 2009 4:11pm
I cleaned this thread up a little bit. Let's keep things less personal.
C
cbus4life
Posts: 2,849
Nov 22, 2009 3:00pm
Obama is Muhammad, Reagan is Jesus.
Cleveland Buck's avatar
Cleveland Buck
Posts: 5,126
Nov 22, 2009 3:20pm
Elections aren't all they are stealing in Washington.
believer's avatar
believer
Posts: 8,153
Nov 22, 2009 4:01pm
cbus4life wrote: Obama is Muhammad, Reagan is Jesus.

NAW. Reagan is The Gipper. Obama is the Anointed One.
RoyalNut's avatar
RoyalNut
Posts: 175
Nov 23, 2009 4:47pm
derek bomar wrote:
Cleveland Buck wrote: I'm sure ACORN played a role, but probably not enough to make up the entire difference in votes.
prove it
Prove it!
I love you liberals, you care not how far the rules are bent or even obliterated in some cases to further what you feel to be for the better good.

My question to you would be this, rather then having to prove something that is almost nothing more then common knowledge to anyone that payed even the slightest attention to this election. Please tell me how you believe they did not have a roll in Obama's election?

This I gotta hear!

But you will not answer me, because you can't!
RoyalNut's avatar
RoyalNut
Posts: 175
Nov 24, 2009 9:25am
still waiting on that answer