Girevik's "I hate Rush" megathread

Politics 68 replies 2,748 views
G
girevik
Posts: 97
May 2, 2010 11:47am
http://thinkprogress.org/2010/04/13/limbaugh-coal-mine/

Excerpt:

Last Friday, Rush Limbaugh asked why a coal miner union didn’t protect the 29 miners who were killed when Massey Energy’s Upper Big Branch Mine in Montcoal, WV, exploded under unsafe conditions:
Was there no union responsibility for improving mine safety? Where was the union here? Where was the union? The union is generally holding these companies up demanding all kinds of safety. Why were these miners continuing to work in what apparently was an unsafe atmosphere?
He must be on the pills again, it was a nonunion mine...
LJ's avatar
LJ
Posts: 16,351
May 2, 2010 12:05pm
Per the rules, please elaborate on your opinion shortly.
B
Bigdogg
Posts: 1,429
May 2, 2010 12:09pm
girevik wrote: http://thinkprogress.org/2010/04/13/limbaugh-coal-mine/

Excerpt:

Last Friday, Rush Limbaugh asked why a coal miner union didn’t protect the 29 miners who were killed when Massey Energy’s Upper Big Branch Mine in Montcoal, WV, exploded under unsafe conditions:
Was there no union responsibility for improving mine safety? Where was the union here? Where was the union? The union is generally holding these companies up demanding all kinds of safety. Why were these miners continuing to work in what apparently was an unsafe atmosphere?
He must be on the pills again, it was a nonunion mine...
I will help you out. Rush is an idiot and anyone who actually believes anything he says is under suspicion also.
G
girevik
Posts: 97
May 2, 2010 12:11pm
Well, like I said in my original post:
He must be on the pills again, it was a nonunion mine...
Prowar drug addict who got out of a war because of a piumple on his butt seems to think that the union is at fault for a mine disaster in a mine that they don't have a presence in.
LJ's avatar
LJ
Posts: 16,351
May 2, 2010 12:12pm
girevik wrote: Well, like I said in my original post:
He must be on the pills again, it was a nonunion mine...
Prowar drug addict who got out of a war because of a piumple on his butt seems to think that the union is at fault for a mine disaster in a mine that they don't have a presence in.
And what do you think about that?
I
I Wear Pants
Posts: 16,223
May 2, 2010 12:19pm
Bigdogg wrote:
girevik wrote: http://thinkprogress.org/2010/04/13/limbaugh-coal-mine/

Excerpt:

Last Friday, Rush Limbaugh asked why a coal miner union didn’t protect the 29 miners who were killed when Massey Energy’s Upper Big Branch Mine in Montcoal, WV, exploded under unsafe conditions:
Was there no union responsibility for improving mine safety? Where was the union here? Where was the union? The union is generally holding these companies up demanding all kinds of safety. Why were these miners continuing to work in what apparently was an unsafe atmosphere?
He must be on the pills again, it was a nonunion mine...
I will help you out. Rush is an idiot and anyone who actually believes anything he says is under suspicion also.
G
girevik
Posts: 97
May 2, 2010 12:24pm
LJ wrote:
girevik wrote: Well, like I said in my original post:
He must be on the pills again, it was a nonunion mine...
Prowar drug addict who got out of a war because of a piumple on his butt seems to think that the union is at fault for a mine disaster in a mine that they don't have a presence in.
And what do you think about that?
I think he must be on the pills again.

3rd time.
LJ's avatar
LJ
Posts: 16,351
May 2, 2010 12:29pm
girevik wrote:
LJ wrote:
girevik wrote: Well, like I said in my original post:
He must be on the pills again, it was a nonunion mine...
Prowar drug addict who got out of a war because of a piumple on his butt seems to think that the union is at fault for a mine disaster in a mine that they don't have a presence in.
And what do you think about that?
I think he must be on the pills again.

3rd time.
So you are just making a thread to bash Rush but don't really care either way? Is that what you are trying to say?
believer's avatar
believer
Posts: 8,153
May 2, 2010 12:33pm
LJ wrote:So you are just making a thread to bash Rush but don't really care either way? Is that what you are trying to say?
He's just upset that Rush is riiiight.
G
girevik
Posts: 97
May 2, 2010 12:33pm
I sure do care, I took the time to make the thread.

With people like this the knee jerk reaction is always "it had to be because of 'THEM'" no matter that the story is. Only this time "THEM" was not involved.

That and Rush Limbaugh is a drug addict who dodged the draft because of a pimple on his butt who must have relapsed to think that a union has control of a mine that they have no presence in.
LJ's avatar
LJ
Posts: 16,351
May 2, 2010 12:36pm
girevik wrote: I sure do care, I took the time to make the thread.

With people like this the knee jerk reaction is always "it had to be because of 'THEM'" no matter that the story is. Only this time "THEM" was not involved.

That and Rush Limbaugh is a drug addict who dodged the draft because of a pimple on his butt who must have relapsed to think that a union has control of a mine that they have no presence in.
Ok, just wanted to see what your story is, seeing as how you haven't posted on this forum since November, yet you manage in less than 1 hour to make 3 threads attacking 1 party, and a total of 21 posts in 4 hours, some of them having to be deleted or edited due to rules violations. In other words, tread carefully.
G
girevik
Posts: 97
May 2, 2010 12:36pm
believer wrote:
LJ wrote:So you are just making a thread to bash Rush but don't really care either way? Is that what you are trying to say?
He's just upset that Rush is riiiight.
So, like the thrice divorced drug addicted leader of the family values party, in your world people who aren't responsible for things actually are. Interesting take on the whole idea of "personal responsibilty" that you claim to be all about
believer's avatar
believer
Posts: 8,153
May 2, 2010 12:39pm
girevik wrote:That and Rush Limbaugh is a drug addict who dodged the draft because of a pimple on his butt who must have relapsed to think that a union has control of a mine that they have no presence in.
You would think that Rush being a draft-dodging drug addict would endear him just a bit to those on the left...but some on the left can only show empathy and understanding to those with personal issues if they share their own leftist political views.
ptown_trojans_1's avatar
ptown_trojans_1
Posts: 7,632
May 2, 2010 12:44pm
believer wrote:
girevik wrote:That and Rush Limbaugh is a drug addict who dodged the draft because of a pimple on his butt who must have relapsed to think that a union has control of a mine that they have no presence in.
You would think that Rush being a draft-dodging drug addict would endear him just a bit to those on the left...but some on the left can only show empathy and understanding to those with personal issues if they share their own leftist political views.
Same goes for the right, generally.

I honestly could care less what Rush says. He has no credibility in my eyes, just spews his radical point of view each day.
C
cbus4life
Posts: 2,849
May 2, 2010 12:45pm
I don't really get up-in-arms about Rush, and think of him as pretty much the same type of person as all the douchebags on the left, Olbermann, Maddow, etc., but you've gotta admit that this is a really funny comment...
LJ's avatar
LJ
Posts: 16,351
May 2, 2010 12:46pm
cbus4life wrote: I don't really get up-in-arms about Rush, and think of him as pretty much the same type of person as all the douchebags on the left, Olbermann, Maddow, etc., but you've gotta admit that this is a really funny comment...
I can't really find anything Rush says funny, as he is just a dickhead blowhard who is causing more problems than he solves. People like him are the cause for the divide in this country.
believer's avatar
believer
Posts: 8,153
May 2, 2010 12:48pm
ptown_trojans_1 wrote:Same goes for the right, generally.
Not denying that. However, if Rush were a liberal, I highly doubt his draft-dodging drug addict background would even be worthy of mention since the left is all about "inclusion and understanding."
ptown_trojans_1's avatar
ptown_trojans_1
Posts: 7,632
May 2, 2010 12:51pm
believer wrote:
ptown_trojans_1 wrote:Same goes for the right, generally.
Not denying that. However, if Rush were a liberal, I highly doubt his draft-dodging drug addict background would even be worthy of mention since the left is all about "inclusion and understanding."
If he was a liberal, he would still be called that by the right.
Left=right in that regard.
majorspark's avatar
majorspark
Posts: 5,122
May 2, 2010 12:51pm
I listen to Rush religiously each day. Without his radio program I would be incapable of forming any political opinions on my own. I am a foot soldier in his army for the right in their battle against the regime. I await our leaders orders each day.
believer's avatar
believer
Posts: 8,153
May 2, 2010 12:53pm
LJ wrote:
cbus4life wrote: I don't really get up-in-arms about Rush, and think of him as pretty much the same type of person as all the douchebags on the left, Olbermann, Maddow, etc., but you've gotta admit that this is a really funny comment...
I can't really find anything Rush says funny, as he is just a dickhead blowhard who is causing more problems than he solves. People like him are the cause for the divide in this country.
He's also a voice for millions of Americans whose opinions are routinely ignored or at least lambasted by the so-called objective mainstream media.

If we had true journalism in this country, guys like Rush would not be quite so popular.

But "divisive" for some on the left means anyone with conservative views needs to be silenced.
believer's avatar
believer
Posts: 8,153
May 2, 2010 12:54pm
majorspark wrote: I listen to Rush religiously each day. Without his radio program I would be incapable of forming any political opinions on my own. I am a foot soldier in his army for the right in their battle against the regime. I await our leaders orders each day.
Me too. Seig heil! :P
G
girevik
Posts: 97
May 2, 2010 1:59pm
I'm having a hard time with this one. The thing is I have been looking high and low and a can't find a single instance when the riiight faulted Bush for hurricane Katrina. Now their battle cry is "this is Obama's Katrina!!!" Must be the drugs talking again...

http://www.wisepolitics.com/rush-limbaugh-obamas-katrina-comment-1429.html

Excerpt:
Rush Limbaugh Obama’s Katrina Comment – U.S. President Barack Obama is receiving a number of criticisms for the recent oil spill. Rush Limbaugh recently went on to say that the incident would be remembered as “Obama’s Katrina,” in reference to the breaking of the levees when George Bush was still in office. However, after the statement was made, Media Matters for America also released a statement to counteract what Limbaugh had said on his radio program.
G
girevik
Posts: 97
May 2, 2010 2:07pm
Asking for honesty must be clearly defined as "hate" in the riiight's political handbook.

LOL
LJ's avatar
LJ
Posts: 16,351
May 2, 2010 2:10pm
girevik wrote: Asking for honesty must be clearly defined as "hate" in the riiight's political handbook.

LOL
I'm not a "right"
LJ wrote: Prepare to be surprised

Q
queencitybuckeye
Posts: 7,117
May 2, 2010 2:19pm
girevik wrote: I'm having a hard time with this one. The thing is I have been looking high and low and a can't find a single instance when the riiight faulted Bush for hurricane Katrina.
Do you believe that President Bush caused a hurricane?