Belly35
Posts: 9,716
Apr 30, 2010 10:57am
State lawmakers and others in Texas, Utah, Georgia, Ohio and Maryland are seizing on Arizona's hard-line approach to illegal immigration, which has the approval of many conservatives who say it is necessary in the absence of adequate federal policies.
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20003648-503544.html?tag=stack
New Mexico or Florida will soon be add to that list ...that would make 8 States ........can we get 25 States
WOW! What would Obama do if even more states followed Arizona lead ?
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20003648-503544.html?tag=stack
New Mexico or Florida will soon be add to that list ...that would make 8 States ........can we get 25 States
WOW! What would Obama do if even more states followed Arizona lead ?
B
bigkahuna
Posts: 4,454
Apr 30, 2010 11:56am
Or you're like me and want them caught and turned right back around. If you become a legalized citizen AND then come over, Awesome.jhay78 wrote:If you're a Republican, you enforce the law.Prescott wrote: I am not saying this law is just, but what remedies are better.Arizona's resources are being taxed by the illegal aliens and their children. It has been estimated that there are over 450,000 illegal aliens in Arizona.. What should they do??
If you're a Democrat, you turn those 450,000 into Democratic voters via amnesty, citizenship, and cries of "racial profiling" and "Nazi police state".
I know everyone on here wants something done about illegal immigration. However, this bill is not the way to go. I honestly wonder how many illegal Canadians are in the U.S., and if WA, ID,MT,ND,MN,MI,NY... are doing anything about it.
IggyPride00
Posts: 6,482
Apr 30, 2010 2:18pm
Arizona is now making a push to have teachers with heavy accents barred from teaching English.
They have also passed new provisions for their ethnic studies classes:
Liberals are spinning completely out of control right now with these changes. If you want some comedy go read some progressive bogs about their take on all of this new stuff as they just can't handle it, you would think the world is ending the way some of them describe the consequences.
Arizona Grades Teachers on Fluency:
State Pushes School Districts to Reassign Instructors With Heavy Accents or Other Shortcomings in Their English
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703572504575213883276427528.html
They have also passed new provisions for their ethnic studies classes:
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/04/30/arizona-legislature-passes-banning-ethnic-studies-programs/The new bill would make it illegal for a school district to teach any courses that promote the overthrow of the U.S. government, promote resentment of a particular race or class of people, are designed primarily for students of a particular ethnic group or "advocate ethnic solidarity instead of the treatment of pupils as individuals."
The bill stipulates that courses can continue to be taught for Native American pupils in compliance with federal law and does not prohibit English as a second language classes. It also does not prohibit the teaching of the Holocaust or other cases of genocide.
Liberals are spinning completely out of control right now with these changes. If you want some comedy go read some progressive bogs about their take on all of this new stuff as they just can't handle it, you would think the world is ending the way some of them describe the consequences.
tk421
Posts: 8,500
Apr 30, 2010 2:29pm
This is what happens when the Federal Government abdicates their responsibility to control and secure the borders. The people in D.C. have no one to blame but themselves. If someone has people trespassing and breaking into their property, and the police and other authorities refuse to do anything about the problem, eventually the homeowner will get fed up and take matters into their own hands. This is what is starting to happen now.
jhay78
Posts: 1,917
Apr 30, 2010 4:09pm
Except in the case of Arizona, "taking matters into their own hands" means simply enforcing existing federal law. It's not like they're sending SWAT teams out into the street to gun down anyone who looks Mexican (although if you believe libs then that's right around the cornertk421 wrote: This is what happens when the Federal Government abdicates their responsibility to control and secure the borders. The people in D.C. have no one to blame but themselves. If someone has people trespassing and breaking into their property, and the police and other authorities refuse to do anything about the problem, eventually the homeowner will get fed up and take matters into their own hands. This is what is starting to happen now.
).But I get what you're saying though- the federal government could have solved this problem a long time ago.
tk421
Posts: 8,500
Apr 30, 2010 4:52pm
The way the left is whining, you'd think they were sending out SWAT. Anything that takes away from their potential voter base is not okay with them.jhay78 wrote:Except in the case of Arizona, "taking matters into their own hands" means simply enforcing existing federal law. It's not like they're sending SWAT teams out into the street to gun down anyone who looks Mexican (although if you believe libs then that's right around the cornertk421 wrote: This is what happens when the Federal Government abdicates their responsibility to control and secure the borders. The people in D.C. have no one to blame but themselves. If someone has people trespassing and breaking into their property, and the police and other authorities refuse to do anything about the problem, eventually the homeowner will get fed up and take matters into their own hands. This is what is starting to happen now.
But I get what you're saying though- the federal government could have solved this problem a long time ago.
CenterBHSFan
Posts: 6,115
Apr 30, 2010 7:22pm
bigkahuna wrote: Or you're like me and want them caught and turned right back around. If you become a legalized citizen AND then come over, Awesome.
I know everyone on here wants something done about illegal immigration. However, this bill is not the way to go. I honestly wonder how many illegal Canadians are in the U.S., and if WA, ID,MT,ND,MN,MI,NY... are doing anything about it.
But, isn't this bill the same thing that is on the federal government's books? What's the difference in right or wrong between the fed and the state?
Wouldn't the states be closer to the problem, and therefore able to deal with it more correctly, than the federal government?
B
bigkahuna
Posts: 4,454
Apr 30, 2010 9:19pm
The federal government says it's okay for law enforcement to walk up and ask anyone to PROVE they are an American Citizen?
All sarcasm aside, please show me where it says this because I've never seen it say something like that.
I know the feds have policy in place to find illegals, but I don't think it involves the FBI/CIA randomly searching people because they LOOK ILLEGAL
All sarcasm aside, please show me where it says this because I've never seen it say something like that.
I know the feds have policy in place to find illegals, but I don't think it involves the FBI/CIA randomly searching people because they LOOK ILLEGAL
Sykotyk
Posts: 1,155
Apr 30, 2010 9:21pm
How is it constitutional to be stopped by police and asked to prove your citizenship only because 'they don't think you're a citizen'?
You're innocent until proven guilty. Reasonable suspicion cannot be 'because you look Mexican'. There's no where in this law that Arizona can't just use it as a blanket requirement that everybody must prove at all times they're a citizen and any lack of proof will get you in trouble.
I love how conservatives wave the constitution around ad nauseum, yet when there's a law that goes along with their belief system.... the constitution conveniently gets tucked away. The ends do not justify the means. Maybe in a dictatorship. But that's not where we live.
Sykotyk
You're innocent until proven guilty. Reasonable suspicion cannot be 'because you look Mexican'. There's no where in this law that Arizona can't just use it as a blanket requirement that everybody must prove at all times they're a citizen and any lack of proof will get you in trouble.
I love how conservatives wave the constitution around ad nauseum, yet when there's a law that goes along with their belief system.... the constitution conveniently gets tucked away. The ends do not justify the means. Maybe in a dictatorship. But that's not where we live.
Sykotyk
Mr. 300
Posts: 3,090
Apr 30, 2010 9:28pm
They can't stop you unless you're stopped for violation.
majorspark
Posts: 5,122
Apr 30, 2010 11:06pm
It appears you are correct. I posted this earlier in the thread but it does not appear to me that they can randomly just come up and ask someone for proof of their legal status.Mr. 300 wrote: They can't stop you unless you're stopped for violation.
Here is a link to the Arizona law. Judge for yourself.
http://www.azleg.gov/legtext/49leg/2r/bills/sb1070s.pdf
Article 8 section B
It depends on the phrase "lawful contact". What is the definition of lawful contact? I would define "lawful contact" observing an individual violating state law. If it is contact based on violation of any Arizona state law, I would find no problem with this law. Just like someone stopped for speeding could be reasonably charged with a secondary offense of DUI, drug possession or have a warrant for arrest.20 B. FOR ANY LAWFUL CONTACT MADE BY A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL OR AGENCY
21 OF THIS STATE OR A COUNTY, CITY, TOWN OR OTHER POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THIS
22 STATE WHERE REASONABLE SUSPICION EXISTS THAT THE PERSON IS AN ALIEN WHO IS
23 UNLAWFULLY PRESENT IN THE UNITED STATES, A REASONABLE ATTEMPT SHALL BE MADE,
24 WHEN PRACTICABLE, TO DETERMINE THE IMMIGRATION STATUS OF THE PERSON. THE
25 PERSON'S IMMIGRATION STATUS SHALL BE VERIFIED WITH THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT
26 PURSUANT TO 8 UNITED STATES CODE SECTION 1373(c).
Glory Days
Posts: 7,809
Apr 30, 2010 11:17pm
i would say stopping a big rig and finding 50 people packed into the trailer might be probable cause to check their citizenship.
majorspark
Posts: 5,122
Apr 30, 2010 11:21pm
If they looked Mexican that would make you a profiler and a racist.Glory Days wrote: i would say stopping a big rig and finding 50 people packed into the trailer might be probable cause to check their citizenship.
Glory Days
Posts: 7,809
Apr 30, 2010 11:34pm
what if for every trailer of mexicans we find, we also find a trailer full of canadians, oh wait....majorspark wrote:If they looked Mexican that would make you a profiler and a racist.Glory Days wrote: i would say stopping a big rig and finding 50 people packed into the trailer might be probable cause to check their citizenship.
believer
Posts: 8,153
May 1, 2010 4:43am
Ar you saying Canadians aren't clamoring to cross our borders illegally? That's right...the Canucks only visit here to get decent health care services.Glory Days wrote:what if for every trailer of mexicans we find, we also find a trailer full of canadians, oh wait....
CenterBHSFan
Posts: 6,115
May 1, 2010 8:15am
Well for those who don't like the bill, how could you enforce illegal immigration (talking about people sneaking into that state from Mexico) into Arizona without any sort of profiling at all??
Or is that the point?
Look, the feds have dropped the ball on this one, so I have no problem with the states taking on this issue.
Or is that the point?
Look, the feds have dropped the ball on this one, so I have no problem with the states taking on this issue.
Mr. 300
Posts: 3,090
May 1, 2010 8:34am
CenterBHSFan wrote: Well for those who don't like the bill, how could you enforce illegal immigration (talking about people sneaking into that state from Mexico) into Arizona without any sort of profiling at all??
Or is that the point?
Look, the feds have dropped the ball on this one, so I have no problem with the states taking on this issue.
Obama's admin forced this upon Arizona. I applaud them for doing this to protect themselves. As stated earlier, it may not be perfect, but they can't afford to let it continue while Obama looks at Cap and Trade as more important.
Now they need to rework the language so all those caught are deported if they are not here legally.
B
bigkahuna
Posts: 4,454
May 1, 2010 9:03am
I'd be fine with some type of boarder. Really what's stopping Arizona from putting a fence up or something like that?
I still think that even though you have to be detained to be asked to prove your citizenship, it's going to undoubtably lead to profiling. If you see me walking down the street, and you want to know bad enough, you'll find something to arrest me for(I "Look" Hispanic).
Like I said, why aren't the Northern Border states doing this as well? Probably because you can't tell between a typical American Citizen and Canadian.
This is EXTREME I know, but I'm going to use this comparison. In WWII, we put Japanese Americans in internment camps, why not the German Americans?
I still think that even though you have to be detained to be asked to prove your citizenship, it's going to undoubtably lead to profiling. If you see me walking down the street, and you want to know bad enough, you'll find something to arrest me for(I "Look" Hispanic).
Like I said, why aren't the Northern Border states doing this as well? Probably because you can't tell between a typical American Citizen and Canadian.
This is EXTREME I know, but I'm going to use this comparison. In WWII, we put Japanese Americans in internment camps, why not the German Americans?
P
Prescott
Posts: 2,569
May 1, 2010 9:26am
What is the problem if this is the law??? Cops ask for passenger ID all of the time during traffic stops.It depends on the phrase "lawful contact". What is the definition of lawful contact? I would define "lawful contact" observing an individual violating state law. If it is contact based on violation of any Arizona state law, I would find no problem with this law. Just like someone stopped for speeding could be reasonably charged with a secondary offense of DUI, drug possession or have a warrant for arrest.
KnightRyder
Posts: 1,428
May 1, 2010 10:15am
or unless they make up some bullshit reason to stop you. which happens quite frequently.Mr. 300 wrote: They can't stop you unless you're stopped for violation.
majorspark
Posts: 5,122
May 1, 2010 10:36am
Yes it does. So what is the point should we stop allowing police officers to ask for ID when making traffic stops?KnightRyder wrote:or unless they make up some bullshit reason to stop you. which happens quite frequently.Mr. 300 wrote: They can't stop you unless you're stopped for violation.
dwccrew
Posts: 7,817
May 1, 2010 12:51pm
bigkahuna wrote: The federal government says it's okay for law enforcement to walk up and ask anyone to PROVE they are an American Citizen?
Are you guys serious? Someone has to have committed some sort of violation, they can't just pull someone over and ask them to provide papers. Good God some people lack common sense and rationality. This bill doesn't put anyone's rights at jeopardy the way I interpret it. Now if law enforcement abuses it, that's a different story, but if they were going to profile, they would do it without this bill, so that point is moot.Sykotyk wrote: How is it constitutional to be stopped by police and asked to prove your citizenship only because 'they don't think you're a citizen'?
You're innocent until proven guilty. Reasonable suspicion cannot be 'because you look Mexican'. There's no where in this law that Arizona can't just use it as a blanket requirement that everybody must prove at all times they're a citizen and any lack of proof will get you in trouble.
I love how conservatives wave the constitution around ad nauseum, yet when there's a law that goes along with their belief system.... the constitution conveniently gets tucked away. The ends do not justify the means. Maybe in a dictatorship. But that's not where we live.
Sykotyk
My guess is that the northern states aren't doing it because Canadiens aren't coming over the border illegally and putting a financial drain on the local economies. Just a thought....bigkahuna wrote: I'd be fine with some type of boarder. Really what's stopping Arizona from putting a fence up or something like that?
I still think that even though you have to be detained to be asked to prove your citizenship, it's going to undoubtably lead to profiling. If you see me walking down the street, and you want to know bad enough, you'll find something to arrest me for(I "Look" Hispanic).
Like I said, why aren't the Northern Border states doing this as well? Probably because you can't tell between a typical American Citizen and Canadian.
This is EXTREME I know, but I'm going to use this comparison. In WWII, we put Japanese Americans in internment camps, why not the German Americans?
Mr. 300
Posts: 3,090
May 1, 2010 3:13pm
What's your point?? It currently happens all over America....cops do it in most major cities.KnightRyder wrote:or unless they make up some bullshit reason to stop you. which happens quite frequently.Mr. 300 wrote: They can't stop you unless you're stopped for violation.
Glory Days
Posts: 7,809
May 1, 2010 3:56pm
only if you dont know law is it bullshit.KnightRyder wrote:or unless they make up some bullshit reason to stop you. which happens quite frequently.Mr. 300 wrote: They can't stop you unless you're stopped for violation.
G
girevik
Posts: 97
May 1, 2010 9:33pm
I am happy about this law. My grandparents didn't come here from 4,000 miles away so they could watch the place get over ran by immigrants!
Seriously, I can't wait to pay $10.00 for a tomato. Way to go, Arizona!
Seriously, I can't wait to pay $10.00 for a tomato. Way to go, Arizona!