Is Brady Quinn hurting Claussen

Home ▸ Archive ▸ College Sports ▸ Is Brady Quinn hurting Claussen
S

sjmvsfscs08

Senior Member

2,963 posts
May 2, 2010 3:14 PM
Well if Notre Dame sucks, why does that matter?

And how did Troy Smith do against Tim Tebow in 2006? :s
May 2, 2010 3:14pm
R

rock_knutne

May 2, 2010 3:51 PM
I see sleeper and "PP"runner's ignored post's on here. Just pay no attention to those douche bags, sleeper is a piece of shit and "PP" is just that......a dick! They never have anything substantial to add to the discussion except for being assholes.
May 2, 2010 3:51pm
S

sjmvsfscs08

Senior Member

2,963 posts
May 2, 2010 4:11 PM
Well sleeper is truly a little girl. ccrunner at least is somewhat creative. Both would benefit greatly form realizing there's always a bigger fish.
May 2, 2010 4:11pm
sleeper's avatar

sleeper

Legend

27,879 posts
May 2, 2010 9:49 PM
You guys just don't like us 'trolls' because we don't sugar coat the truth about ND. The insults are LOLtastic though, I suppose that's what I would resort to too if my team was god awful year in year out.
May 2, 2010 9:49pm
S

sjmvsfscs08

Senior Member

2,963 posts
May 2, 2010 10:00 PM
Show me one post in which an Irish fan says Notre Dame has been good lately.

You've surpasses "troll" status, that is ccrunner. You sir, are nothing more than a bitch crying out for attention.
May 2, 2010 10:00pm
S

sjmvsfscs08

Senior Member

2,963 posts
May 2, 2010 10:30 PM
Can you disprove that a number of highly-regarded recruits haven't chosen Notre Dame? I'm fairly certain I set you straight on that topic. As for the coaches, Notre Dame fans had a lot to be excited about, can you deny that? Willingham won his first ten games, and it was a mirage. Weis was predicted to start out 0-6, but went 9-3 and 10-3 in his first two season. The reality is Willingham was a joke, 2003 was a fluke, and Weis was a capable offensive coordinator but couldn't cope with the idiosyncrasies of being a college coach and not an NFL coordinator. But when you win a slew of Superbowls, who wouldn't be excited? Although I very clearly remember killer_ewok being anti-Weis quite often.

I think you're exaggerating.
May 2, 2010 10:30pm
M

Mr Pat

Senior Member

519 posts
May 3, 2010 1:30 AM
ccrunner609 wrote:
sjmvsfscs08 wrote: Show me one post in which an Irish fan says Notre Dame has been good lately.

You've surpasses "troll" status, that is ccrunner. You sir, are nothing more than a bitch crying out for attention.
for years on JJ the ND nutchasers always talked it up and they were set straight by people like me.

And it never stops, ND has the greatest recruits ever, greatest coaches ever.........ect.
Link? Or is it just how you remember it?
May 3, 2010 1:30am
killer_ewok's avatar

killer_ewok

iRep

11,379 posts
May 4, 2010 12:04 PM
sleeper wrote: You guys just don't like us 'trolls' because we don't sugar coat the truth about ND. The insults are LOLtastic though, I suppose that's what I would resort to too if my team was god awful year in year out.
The reason I don't like the trolls has nothing to do with "the truth about ND." I don't sugar coat the truth about ND, their coaching, players, etc. I've told it like it is to the point where I've been criticized by some of my fellow ND fans. That's fine.

The reason I don't like the trolls is because their only purpose is to go out of their way to annoy people. We know ND has has stunk for the better part of the last 15 years. Most of us acknowledge that and admit it. Of course, the trolls feel the need to repeat the same (un)witty shit over and over again. They're beating a dead horse....just to be assholes. That's why not only ND fans don't care for you....but many of your own fan base call you out for being jerks.

So if it's not just us ND fans voicing our disdain for you.....what does that tell you?
May 4, 2010 12:04pm
K

ksig489

Senior Member

943 posts
May 4, 2010 1:14 PM
Clausen got drafted late. It is a reality. Why? It is a combination of his character issues and the fact that he simply isnt that good. He is NOT a proven winner, and if history has shown us anything it is that if there are "questions" about a players character it almost always turns out that they in fact DO have a "questionable" character.
May 4, 2010 1:14pm
sleeper's avatar

sleeper

Legend

27,879 posts
May 4, 2010 2:57 PM
killer_ewok wrote:
sleeper wrote: You guys just don't like us 'trolls' because we don't sugar coat the truth about ND. The insults are LOLtastic though, I suppose that's what I would resort to too if my team was god awful year in year out.
The reason I don't like the trolls has nothing to do with "the truth about ND." I don't sugar coat the truth about ND, their coaching, players, etc. I've told it like it is to the point where I've been criticized by some of my fellow ND fans. That's fine.

The reason I don't like the trolls is because their only purpose is to go out of their way to annoy people. We know ND has has stunk for the better part of the last 15 years. Most of us acknowledge that and admit it. Of course, the trolls feel the need to repeat the same (un)witty shit over and over again. They're beating a dead horse....just to be assholes. That's why not only ND fans don't care for you....but many of your own fan base call you out for being jerks.

So if it's not just us ND fans voicing our disdain for you.....what does that tell you?
There's a few fans on here that don't admit they are terrible, most notably Rock Knute, and as long as he continues to spout off, so will I.
May 4, 2010 2:57pm
R

rock_knutne

May 4, 2010 3:53 PM
^^^^^I just happen to be logged off the site and saw your post. I've openly admitted that ND is and has been down. Please show me one post where I say ND is a world beater or call them great? You can't, so go crawl back in to your hole you low life!
May 4, 2010 3:53pm
S

sjmvsfscs08

Senior Member

2,963 posts
May 5, 2010 1:44 PM
ksig489 wrote: Clausen got drafted late. It is a reality. Why? It is a combination of his character issues and the fact that he simply isnt that good. He is NOT a proven winner, and if history has shown us anything it is that if there are "questions" about a players character it almost always turns out that they in fact DO have a "questionable" character.
Yeahhhh you lost all credibility since you think this actually matters.
May 5, 2010 1:44pm
karen lotz's avatar

karen lotz

TuTu Train

22,284 posts
May 5, 2010 10:01 PM
ccrunner609 wrote: Maybe if he would of actually played for a better coach and team he would of went higher
Good call. Just think, if he would have played for Trestle and the fuckin bucks he might have been #1 overall!!!!
May 5, 2010 10:01pm
S

sjmvsfscs08

Senior Member

2,963 posts
May 6, 2010 2:47 AM
Well they wouldn't have lost to Purdue, that's for sure.
May 6, 2010 2:47am
K

ksig489

Senior Member

943 posts
May 7, 2010 9:27 AM
sjmvsfscs08 wrote:
ksig489 wrote: Clausen got drafted late. It is a reality. Why? It is a combination of his character issues and the fact that he simply isnt that good. He is NOT a proven winner, and if history has shown us anything it is that if there are "questions" about a players character it almost always turns out that they in fact DO have a "questionable" character.
Yeahhhh you lost all credibility since you think this actually matters.
Apparantly the NFL thinks things like this matter. If things like that didnt matter, maybe Clausen would have gone in the first round. There are a lot of guys who go in the first round who have character issues every year. Clausen obviously has those plus the mantle of PROVEN LOSER.

Hell...he even lost to Michigan.
May 7, 2010 9:27am
K

ksig489

Senior Member

943 posts
May 7, 2010 9:33 AM
sjmvsfscs08 wrote: Basically what the intelligent people on here thought, Clausen is a monster of a quarterback but a Californian douchebag. The players on the Panthers seem to agree.

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/05/06/despite-rave-reviews-jimmy-clausen-has-a-long-way-to-go-to-unseat-matt-moore/
Did you actually READ that article? NOTHING in there says that the players on the Panthers think he is a "monster of a quaterback". All it says is that they dont like him...and that is in his first days with the team!

The article cites an "unnamed team official"...one person who says Clausen had a good camp...but then goes on to say otherwise. It also suggests that the team official may be fabricating Clausen's performance as a way to keep pushing the starting QB and keep him from getting complacent.
May 7, 2010 9:33am
killer_ewok's avatar

killer_ewok

iRep

11,379 posts
May 7, 2010 12:32 PM
ksig489 wrote:
sjmvsfscs08 wrote:
ksig489 wrote: Clausen got drafted late. It is a reality. Why? It is a combination of his character issues and the fact that he simply isnt that good. He is NOT a proven winner, and if history has shown us anything it is that if there are "questions" about a players character it almost always turns out that they in fact DO have a "questionable" character.
Yeahhhh you lost all credibility since you think this actually matters.
Apparantly the NFL thinks things like this matter. If things like that didnt matter, maybe Clausen would have gone in the first round. There are a lot of guys who go in the first round who have character issues every year. Clausen obviously has those plus the mantle of PROVEN LOSER.

Hell...he even lost to Michigan.
So what does the fact that the winningest QB in college football history didn't get picked until after Clausen was drafted say? I guess if "things like this mattered so much to the NFL".....McCoy would've been picked MUCH earlier.
May 7, 2010 12:32pm
S

sjmvsfscs08

Senior Member

2,963 posts
May 8, 2010 8:07 AM
ksig489 wrote:
sjmvsfscs08 wrote: Basically what the intelligent people on here thought, Clausen is a monster of a quarterback but a Californian douchebag. The players on the Panthers seem to agree.

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/05/06/despite-rave-reviews-jimmy-clausen-has-a-long-way-to-go-to-unseat-matt-moore/
Did you actually READ that article? NOTHING in there says that the players on the Panthers think he is a "monster of a quaterback". All it says is that they dont like him...and that is in his first days with the team!

The article cites an "unnamed team official"...one person who says Clausen had a good camp...but then goes on to say otherwise. It also suggests that the team official may be fabricating Clausen's performance as a way to keep pushing the starting QB and keep him from getting complacent.
Well this basically disproves that entire argument. :D I have no problem admitting I'm wrong, which I was. Poor researching on my part, never trust NBC.

http://blogs.charlotte.com/panthers/2010/05/weighing-in-on-smith-clausen.html
May 8, 2010 8:07am
KnightRyder's avatar

KnightRyder

Senior Member

1,428 posts
May 10, 2010 12:55 AM
is quinn hurting clausen? when you get down to it, who cares
May 10, 2010 12:55am