D
devil1197
Posts: 6,220
Apr 8, 2010 10:44pm
GOTTI
ytownfootball
Posts: 6,978
Apr 8, 2010 10:44pm
He's fine.
hoops23
Posts: 15,696
Apr 8, 2010 10:45pm
Well, nice to see he's back on the bench.
D
devil1197
Posts: 6,220
Apr 8, 2010 10:45pm
He attacks the rim with a different style, not necessarily soft.Pick6 wrote: he goes up soft and you know it.
just like football..the guy who shys away from contact is the one that will get hurt.
It wasn't the reason he got hurt, but he'll be alright.
ytownfootball
Posts: 6,978
Apr 8, 2010 10:46pm
No way pick. Not the same to me anyway.
D
devil1197
Posts: 6,220
Apr 8, 2010 10:49pm
Cavs will have a chance to win it without LeBron against a team that is taking this game 100%.
Pick6
Posts: 14,946
Apr 8, 2010 10:49pm
JMO...I mean I like him and everything I just think he is soft. Some people have that toughness and some dont. Seems like he never gets a loose ball when its near him either.
D
devil1197
Posts: 6,220
Apr 8, 2010 10:52pm
Jamison is a different style of player, just listen to Cleveland analysts talk about him.
He has an unorthodox way of attacking the rim and even rebounding. Its the main reason why he is still playing at a high level at 33.
He has an unorthodox way of attacking the rim and even rebounding. Its the main reason why he is still playing at a high level at 33.
ytownfootball
Posts: 6,978
Apr 8, 2010 10:53pm
He's never been a finisher around the rim, and he's not got the size to bang bigs all night, just more of a shooter.
wildcats20
Posts: 27,794
Apr 8, 2010 10:53pm
I have to lol at that set.
Benny The Jet
Posts: 2,987
Apr 8, 2010 10:53pm
Haha...Andy with the last 2 shots?!?! Really?
ytownfootball
Posts: 6,978
Apr 8, 2010 10:55pm
Can't be disappointed in this loss. Played really well without studs on the floor. Defense was crappy in the first half but not a bad effort all around.
krazie45
Posts: 1,055
Apr 8, 2010 10:55pm
SMH Varejao...
TigerNation10
Posts: 483
Apr 8, 2010 10:56pm
That was the worst attempt at a game winning shot I have ever seen.
jspitaleri
Posts: 161
Apr 8, 2010 10:57pm
Z was wide open... but oh well... throw away game for the Cavaliers anyways.
hoops23
Posts: 15,696
Apr 8, 2010 10:57pm
Well, you can't really be upset with any loss. I'd actually like to see Jamison and Parker sit.. Let the young guys/bench players get some minutes.
And LOL @ Andy getting the last two shots.. Obviously that play was designed for Mo, but he was cut off...
And LOL @ Andy getting the last two shots.. Obviously that play was designed for Mo, but he was cut off...
Benny The Jet
Posts: 2,987
Apr 8, 2010 10:59pm
So what's the deal with Boobie? I heard them mention he was injured but never heard anything specific. Any news? Really injured, or possible doghouse?
hoops23
Posts: 15,696
Apr 9, 2010 2:50am
something with his foot. I think it happened in practice.
I don't think Boobie would be in the dog house, he's done everything asked and has taken his benching like a champ.
I don't think Boobie would be in the dog house, he's done everything asked and has taken his benching like a champ.
M
miller45452003
Posts: 673
Apr 9, 2010 9:16am
Any word on the injury to Jamison's foot? Serious or no? I didn't watch much of the game and just seen the highlights on sportscenter.
D
devil1197
Posts: 6,220
Apr 9, 2010 10:25am
Not serious.
He'll sit out though.
He'll sit out though.
F
Footwedge
Posts: 9,265
Apr 9, 2010 1:55pm
cavs are 1-2 without LeBron (and others). All were very close and all 3 were against playoff teams. Kind of proves that the Cavs would win 50 games without LeBron.
Benny The Jet
Posts: 2,987
Apr 9, 2010 2:01pm
No tryin to be a dick, but how exactly does that prove they'd win 50? All that proves is they'd roughly win 27 games in an 82 game season.Footwedge wrote: cavs are 1-2 without LeBron (and others). All were very close and all 3 were against playoff teams. Kind of proves that the Cavs would win 50 games without LeBron.
F
Footwedge
Posts: 9,265
Apr 9, 2010 3:02pm
Well obviously you are trying to be a dick. The games LeBron sat out, there were other starters out as well. Last night they were missing 4 starters.Benny The Jet wrote:No tryin to be a dick, but how exactly does that prove they'd win 50? All that proves is they'd roughly win 27 games in an 82 game season.Footwedge wrote: cavs are 1-2 without LeBron (and others). All were very close and all 3 were against playoff teams. Kind of proves that the Cavs would win 50 games without LeBron.
The 2 close losses were on the road. Next time, don't be a dick.
D
devil1197
Posts: 6,220
Apr 9, 2010 3:06pm
Cleveland wasn't missing 4 starters.
Jamison, Mo, JJ, and Parker all started the game last night and everyone but JJ played big minutes along with AV playing 35.
Cleveland was without LeBron (starter) and Shaq (starter) along with West who splits time with Parker at the SG spot. JJ only played 15 minutes but he isn't a starter when Cleveland is fully healthy.
Not sure how you get 4?
Jamison, Mo, JJ, and Parker all started the game last night and everyone but JJ played big minutes along with AV playing 35.
Cleveland was without LeBron (starter) and Shaq (starter) along with West who splits time with Parker at the SG spot. JJ only played 15 minutes but he isn't a starter when Cleveland is fully healthy.
Not sure how you get 4?
Benny The Jet
Posts: 2,987
Apr 9, 2010 3:12pm
Just sayin man...you throw out that they're 1-2 without Lebron this year, so clearly that proves we'd win 50 without him?!?! Fuzzy math. Only 2 years ago, even with Lebron, this team won only 47 games.