se-alum
Posts: 13,948
Apr 2, 2010 1:15pm
Obviously more people than just Buckeye fans thought he was the best player in the country.gibby08 wrote: Jesus...Turner is a good player....he is not as great as all of you make him out to be
W
wkfan
Posts: 1,641
Apr 2, 2010 1:18pm
gibby08 wrote: Thats pretty good that you can miss 5 weeks in the middle of the season and still win POY
What a joke
You have just exposed yourself for the moron that you truly are......don't you realize that the 6 games that Turner missed actually helped him out with regards to these awards?? Ohio State was 3-3 without him with a 1-3 start to the Big Ten season. He comes back...they someting like 18 of 20 games, the Big Ten regular season co-championship, Big Ten tournament championship, a #5 end of season ranking, # 2 seed in the tournament and abirth in the Sweet 16.gibby08 wrote: Nobody is that good
Yea, he isn't that good.....
Apparently, you are far more knowledgeable about college basketball than the voters for this award.gibby08 wrote: Keep thinking Turner was far and away the best player....
because he isn't
Guess you know about as much about college basketball as you do about politics.....
S
Shane Falco
Posts: 440
Apr 2, 2010 1:20pm
I said NEARLY you douche, if I had said he DID, then you can call me out!
NEARLY - ALMOST - CLOSE TO
Not
DID
NEARLY - ALMOST - CLOSE TO
Not
DID
S
Shane Falco
Posts: 440
Apr 2, 2010 1:20pm
I said NEARLY you douche, if I had said he DID, then you can call me out!
NEARLY - ALMOST - CLOSE TO
Not
DID
NEARLY - ALMOST - CLOSE TO
Not
DID
jordo212000
Posts: 10,664
Apr 2, 2010 1:25pm
How does a guy who "isn't that good" win Player of the Year from the AP? Explain that to me Gibby. I am interested to hear
N
Nate
Posts: 3,949
Apr 2, 2010 1:29pm
4 assists a game is not nearly/almost/close to.
120 in a season?
Com'on.
I'm as big of an Evan Turner fan as the next guy but saying he was ALMOST/NEARLY/CLOSE TO averaging a triple double every game is CRAZY!
I would find it acceptable if he was 20/9/8 but 20/9/6 is a HUGE difference.
120 in a season?
Com'on.
I'm as big of an Evan Turner fan as the next guy but saying he was ALMOST/NEARLY/CLOSE TO averaging a triple double every game is CRAZY!
I would find it acceptable if he was 20/9/8 but 20/9/6 is a HUGE difference.
S
Shane Falco
Posts: 440
Apr 2, 2010 1:38pm
I bet I can find a announcer say "he nearly, is close to, or almost" averages a triple double/ game.
I'll see what I can find when I get home.
Wanna bet?
I'll see what I can find when I get home.
Wanna bet?
N
Nate
Posts: 3,949
Apr 2, 2010 1:40pm
I bet you can but does that add in validity to what you said? No.Shane Falco wrote: I bet I can find a announcer say "he nearly, is close to, or almost" averages a triple double/ game.
I'll see what I can find when I get home.
Wanna bet?
That's like me saying I almost make a million dollars a year when I only make $600,000. $400,000 is a BIG difference.
N
Nate
Posts: 3,949
Apr 2, 2010 1:43pm
In 31 games, Evan Turner had 185 assists.
To average 10 assists a game, he would have need 310 assist.
310 - 185 = 125 assists.
125 assists is not almost/nearly/close to. If any announcer wants to argue that with me, I'll send them my e-mail address.
To average 10 assists a game, he would have need 310 assist.
310 - 185 = 125 assists.
125 assists is not almost/nearly/close to. If any announcer wants to argue that with me, I'll send them my e-mail address.
royal_k
Posts: 4,423
Apr 2, 2010 1:49pm
You make $600,000 a year????
N
Nate
Posts: 3,949
Apr 2, 2010 1:50pm
I was speaking hypothetically. I actually make around $2.3 million.royal_k wrote: You make $600,000 a year????
S
Shane Falco
Posts: 440
Apr 2, 2010 1:56pm
I would say it does add validity.
Its was an estimate, a generality, not a definite.
Its was an estimate, a generality, not a definite.
D
devil1197
Posts: 6,220
Apr 2, 2010 1:57pm
Gibby, start on a thread on your website about who you think should of won POY!
Oh wait.
Now, GTFO
Oh wait.
Now, GTFO
N
Nate
Posts: 3,949
Apr 2, 2010 1:58pm
CBS Announcers are the ultimate validity I suppose then. I lose.Shane Falco wrote: I would say it does add validity.
Its was an estimate, a generality, not a definite.
CinciX12
Posts: 2,874
Apr 2, 2010 2:06pm
Damn, Wall got 9, I said a few weeks ago he would get 8. So close.
Harangody though? LULZ!!
Harangody though? LULZ!!
N
Nate
Posts: 3,949
Apr 2, 2010 2:09pm
Shane Falco:
Is 60% close to/almost/nearly 100%?
Is 60% close to/almost/nearly 100%?
Lovejoy1984
Posts: 5,277
Apr 2, 2010 2:12pm
Agree, whoever voted Harangody need to have his/her vote revoked.CinciX12 wrote: Damn, Wall got 9, I said a few weeks ago he would get 8. So close.
Harangody though? LULZ!!
jordo212000
Posts: 10,664
Apr 2, 2010 2:16pm
Let it go dudeKeebler wrote: Shane Falco:
Is 60% close to/almost/nearly 100%?
N
Nate
Posts: 3,949
Apr 2, 2010 2:18pm
No. I'm not trying to bash ET one bit. I'm just stating what announcers say and what stats prove are 2 different things?jordo212000 wrote:Let it go dudeKeebler wrote: Shane Falco:
Is 60% close to/almost/nearly 100%?
S
Shane Falco
Posts: 440
Apr 2, 2010 2:42pm
All right you win! What do I know I'm just a pee-on scab QB.
All Hail the Elf!!
All Hail the Elf!!
N
Nate
Posts: 3,949
Apr 2, 2010 2:47pm
Would you like a cookie?Shane Falco wrote: All right you win! What do I know I'm just a pee-on scab QB.
All Hail the Elf!!
wes_mantooth
Posts: 17,977
Apr 2, 2010 3:04pm
This is bullshit.....O'Rear was robbed
S
Shane Falco
Posts: 440
Apr 2, 2010 3:09pm
Only if I can have a glass of milk with it.
N
Nate
Posts: 3,949
Apr 2, 2010 3:14pm
S
Shane Falco
Posts: 440
Apr 2, 2010 3:22pm
Thank you