wildcats20
Posts: 27,794
Apr 6, 2010 10:11pm
He said Bron was a top 5 player all time. And then he said he is the best 3. Not IN the best 3; the best 3. You know, as in the position. Small forward.........2quik4u wrote:lol it keeps getting lower, first it was top 5, now its top 3. Two hours from now you will be trying to convince people he is the better then Jordan.SQ_Crazies wrote: LeBron is already the best 3 that's ever played the game. You're nuts if you think Bird was ever as good as LeBron is right now. I AM an Indiana kid. I LOVE Larry Bird and he was a great player but he didn't have shit on LeBron.
SQ_Crazies
Posts: 7,977
Apr 6, 2010 10:11pm
3=SF jackass.
2quik4u
Posts: 4,388
Apr 6, 2010 10:16pm
Actually it does work that way you have the base shit off of how good your team is. How can you claim someone is one of the best ever if they have never won shit? Look at Barkley and Malone for instance they are never included on the next level because they didnt win shit.SQ_Crazies wrote: The problem with Kobe fans is they constantly want to give Kobe credit for things the team accomplishes and use it as part of the individual argument. Doesn't work that way. Do you realize how stupid you sound when you're talking about titles and comparing individual players?
2quik4u
Posts: 4,388
Apr 6, 2010 10:17pm
sorry for misreading somethingSQ_Crazies wrote: 3=SF jackass.
SQ_Crazies
Posts: 7,977
Apr 6, 2010 10:18pm
They were never the best either. Either one of them, and they never had an argument for that spot in their careers.
You're talking about team accomplishments and comparing individuals.
You're way too fucking stupid to even bother arguing with.
You're talking about team accomplishments and comparing individuals.
You're way too fucking stupid to even bother arguing with.
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Apr 6, 2010 10:18pm
LOL @ not knowing what a "3" is.2quik4u wrote:lol it keeps getting lower, first it was top 5, now its top 3. Two hours from now you will be trying to convince people he is the better then Jordan.SQ_Crazies wrote: LeBron is already the best 3 that's ever played the game. You're nuts if you think Bird was ever as good as LeBron is right now. I AM an Indiana kid. I LOVE Larry Bird and he was a great player but he didn't have shit on LeBron.
SQ_Crazies
Posts: 7,977
Apr 6, 2010 10:18pm
Show me the playoff series that LeBron has shit a brick and cost his team in and I might side with you...
2quik4u
Posts: 4,388
Apr 6, 2010 10:21pm
I dont care what the fuck you say you can't call someone the best without winning a titleSQ_Crazies wrote: They were never the best either. Either one of them, and they never had an argument for that spot in their careers.
You're talking about team accomplishments and comparing individuals.
You're way too fucking stupid to even bother arguing with.
You could make a case for Malone being one of the great Pf's ever but what is holding him back is he never won a title.
2quik4u
Posts: 4,388
Apr 6, 2010 10:23pm
Well you guys can't use the Lebron has no good teammates excuse this year.SQ_Crazies wrote: Show me the playoff series that LeBron has shit a brick and cost his team in and I might side with you...
SQ_Crazies
Posts: 7,977
Apr 6, 2010 10:24pm
No, he was the best PF of all time. What's holding him back is Tim Duncan, and the only thing that the titles have to do with it is leadership. We aren't comparing the Malone-period Jazz to the Duncan-period Spurs. We're comparing Malone and Duncan. Do you get it yet junior?
D
devil1197
Posts: 6,220
Apr 6, 2010 10:26pm
I think everyone pretty much agrees on that.2quik4u wrote:Well you guys can't use the Lebron has no good teammates excuse this year.SQ_Crazies wrote: Show me the playoff series that LeBron has shit a brick and cost his team in and I might side with you...
Although we have no other all star players, the Cavs have a good enough roster to win it all.
SQ_Crazies
Posts: 7,977
Apr 6, 2010 10:27pm
Well, I won't have to because they're going to win the title.2quik4u wrote:Well you guys can't use the Lebron has no good teammates excuse this year.SQ_Crazies wrote: Show me the playoff series that LeBron has shit a brick and cost his team in and I might side with you...
But if the Lakers win they're the better team, period. I've said since day 1 of the season that they have the most stacked roster in the league. Funny how you can't produce a series that he has disappointed in. You just hate the argument because he got somewhere with bullshit teammates. Kobe QUIT on his, you know it too and that's why you hate the team discussion.
Glory Days
Posts: 7,809
Apr 6, 2010 11:23pm
you mean about as stupid as arguing who the best individual is in a TEAM sport? unless they go 1v1 you can argue who the best is till the cows come home, it wont matter.SQ_Crazies wrote: The problem with Kobe fans is they constantly want to give Kobe credit for things the team accomplishes and use it as part of the individual argument. Doesn't work that way. Do you realize how stupid you sound when you're talking about titles and comparing individual players?
SQ_Crazies
Posts: 7,977
Apr 6, 2010 11:24pm
Not really, that argument will always take place in every sport. Though, currently, there really isn't an argument.
Glory Days
Posts: 7,809
Apr 6, 2010 11:33pm
and taking into account titles will always take place.
2quik4u
Posts: 4,388
Apr 6, 2010 11:34pm
First of all i havent even looked for any games. Second of all Kobes team was worse on top of that he was playing the in the West not the shitty east.SQ_Crazies wrote:Well, I won't have to because they're going to win the title.2quik4u wrote:Well you guys can't use the Lebron has no good teammates excuse this year.SQ_Crazies wrote: Show me the playoff series that LeBron has shit a brick and cost his team in and I might side with you...
But if the Lakers win they're the better team, period. I've said since day 1 of the season that they have the most stacked roster in the league. Funny how you can't produce a series that he has disappointed in. You just hate the argument because he got somewhere with bullshit teammates. Kobe QUIT on his, you know it too and that's why you hate the team discussion.
2quik4u
Posts: 4,388
Apr 6, 2010 11:35pm
Lakers have the best starting 5 there bench blows
Top to bottom Cleveland has the best
Top to bottom Cleveland has the best
SQ_Crazies
Posts: 7,977
Apr 7, 2010 12:26am
LMAO! The last 3 posts all cracked me up.
Well, actually not the last one, I agree with that. But I wouldn't use that as an "excuse" anyways. If they don't win, they don't win. There are other great teams as well, but we'll see. I feel pretty comfortable saying they're going to win it all.
Well, actually not the last one, I agree with that. But I wouldn't use that as an "excuse" anyways. If they don't win, they don't win. There are other great teams as well, but we'll see. I feel pretty comfortable saying they're going to win it all.