Is this the tiebreaker criteria in use for Ohio now? Is this list up-to-date?

1. Least number of team points deducted for flagrant or unsportsmanlike conduct.
2. Greater number of matches won.
3. Greater number of points for fall, defaults, forfeits or disqualifications.
4. Greater number of points for technical falls.
5. Greater number of points for major decisions.
6. Greater number of first points scored.
7. Greater number of points for near-falls.
8. Greater number of takedowns.
9. Greater number of reversals.
10. Greater number of escapes.
11. Fewer penalties for stalling.
12. Fewer stall warnings.
13. Fewer number of points for other infractions.
14. Flip of a disk.

I believe these are correct. I personally haven't seen a dual go past #3 so I guess I'm not a very reliable source.

i have saw 2 duals that went to criteria 6. Both were 42-42 matches (all 6 point victories). what is interesting to note is that if you are in a match like that, a forfeit is better than having your kid get pinned and give up the 1st points of the match.