NFL defensive pass interference rule......

Home Archive Pro Sports NFL defensive pass interference rule......
77Legend's avatar

77Legend

Senior Member

615 posts
Jan 24, 2010 9:37 PM
Do you think it should be a spot foul, or just 15 yards regardless? I think it is bias as opposed to offensive pass interference. If you get called for def pass interference 40 yards down the field, it's a 40 yard penalty, but if it's pass interference on the WR 40 yards down the field you only back up 15 yards. I think it should be 15 yards regardless or half the distance if within the 20 yard line, unless they are in the end zone then it should be placed on the goal line. What are your thoughts?
Jan 24, 2010 9:37pm
Lovejoy1984's avatar

Lovejoy1984

Senior Member

5,277 posts
Jan 24, 2010 9:40 PM
Nope it should be a spot foul. That's the one thing I'd like to see the NCAA change to be closer to the NFL.

How many times have you seen a WR blow by a DB and just basically get tackled because they know it's better to sacrifice the 15 yards, rather than give up a long catch or a TD.
Jan 24, 2010 9:40pm
IggyPride00's avatar

IggyPride00

Senior Member

6,482 posts
Jan 24, 2010 9:40 PM
I hate the rule, but it is the correct one.

Guys would just grab and pull every time they get beat down field. That would make for a shitty game if it kept happening because it would sure be better than the alternative.
Jan 24, 2010 9:40pm
77Legend's avatar

77Legend

Senior Member

615 posts
Jan 24, 2010 9:42 PM
I see your point with that. But look how Larry Fitzgerald ran through Charles Woodson twice in the Wild Card game, that was NOT called. I hate how the offense gets the favoritism.
Jan 24, 2010 9:42pm
H

h2thaizzo

Senior Member

256 posts
Jan 24, 2010 9:43 PM
I think they call pass interference too damn much anyways.
Jan 24, 2010 9:43pm
Lovejoy1984's avatar

Lovejoy1984

Senior Member

5,277 posts
Jan 24, 2010 9:43 PM
77Legend wrote: I see your point with that. But look how Larry Fitzgerald ran through Charles Woodson twice in the Wild Card game, that was NOT called. I hate how the offense gets the favoritism.
This I can agree with. You hardly see it called on the offense.
Jan 24, 2010 9:43pm
Trueblue23's avatar

Trueblue23

BASEDgod

7,463 posts
Jan 24, 2010 9:47 PM
NCAA should adopt this rule, NFL should adopt college OT
Jan 24, 2010 9:47pm
wildcats20's avatar

wildcats20

In ROY I Trust!!

27,794 posts
Jan 24, 2010 9:55 PM
HighRoller74 wrote: Nope it should be a spot foul. That's the one think=g I'd like to see the NCAA change to be closer to the NFL.

How many times have you seen a WR blow by a DB and just basically get tackled because they know it's better to sacrifice the 15 yards, rather than give up a long catch or a TD.
Exactly how I feel.
Jan 24, 2010 9:55pm
Non's avatar

Non

Senior Member

9,517 posts
Jan 24, 2010 10:00 PM
I don't think you should have to look back.

Like say a centerfielder jumps up with his back to home plate and robs a home run, it's just athletic ability.

If you're covering the deep pass and jump up with your back to the QB and knock it away without contact that should be ok.

A universal rule has developed for officials to make the call if the defensive back does not look back for the ball just to make it easier for the ref to call but it doesn't have to be that way.
Jan 24, 2010 10:00pm
77Legend's avatar

77Legend

Senior Member

615 posts
Jan 24, 2010 11:18 PM
I do not like the face guarding rule either!
Jan 24, 2010 11:18pm
Laley23's avatar

Laley23

GOAT

29,506 posts
Jan 24, 2010 11:47 PM
I hate the face guarding rule. Why is is a penalty if you dont touch the guy and knock the ball away. It should be rewarded as good defense (much like the force out rule FINALLY is rewarded).

The PI should be spot. As others have said, with how good the NFL offenses are it would be DBs just tackling the WRs when they get burned.
Jan 24, 2010 11:47pm