Ohio Chatter
Ohio Chatter

Forums

All Threads Serious Business Sports Politics Archive Pick 'ems
Log In Create Account

Chad Johnson

Home ▸ Archive ▸ Pro Sports ▸ Chad Johnson
A

Al Capone

18-3 since 2000

1,727 posts
Jan 11, 2010 10:37 PM
If you think stinco would be the #1 receiver on the Steelers, you my friend are either on crack or dont know anything about football.
Jan 11, 2010 10:37pm
A

Al Capone

18-3 since 2000

1,727 posts
Jan 11, 2010 10:39 PM
Plus you're a Browns fan so I dont think we can have an intelligent conversation about football if you know what I mean.
Jan 11, 2010 10:39pm
DeyDurkie5's avatar

DeyDurkie5

Senior Member

11,324 posts
Jan 11, 2010 10:41 PM
Al Capone wrote: If you think stinco would be the #1 receiver on the Steelers, you my friend are either on crack or dont know anything about football.
Since 2001....

Ocho- 684 receptions 9952 yards receiving 62 td's

Ward 771 receptions 8416 yards receiving 67 td's

Almost even in production...SO like i said, ocho 1 with Ward a very close 2nd.

If you think ocho wouldn't be a top 3 on the Steelers, you sir are a fucking moron
Jan 11, 2010 10:41pm
DeyDurkie5's avatar

DeyDurkie5

Senior Member

11,324 posts
Jan 11, 2010 10:42 PM
Al Capone wrote: Plus you're a Browns fan so I dont think we can have an intelligent conversation about football if you know what I mean.
how does my team sucking have anything to do with my sports knowledge? lol are you 10 years old? or a steelers version of NCF?
Jan 11, 2010 10:42pm
Lovejoy1984's avatar

Lovejoy1984

Senior Member

5,277 posts
Jan 11, 2010 10:42 PM
As an impartial observer, Ochiocinco would be the #1 WR on the Steelers, and if Al Capone thinks different, it's clearly Bias.
Jan 11, 2010 10:42pm
DeyDurkie5's avatar

DeyDurkie5

Senior Member

11,324 posts
Jan 11, 2010 10:46 PM
HighRoller74 wrote: As an impartial observer, Ochiocinco would be the #1 WR on the Steelers, and if Al Capone thinks different, it's clearly Bias.
thank you for the logic
Jan 11, 2010 10:46pm
A

Al Capone

18-3 since 2000

1,727 posts
Jan 11, 2010 10:46 PM
DeyDurkie5 wrote:
Al Capone wrote: If you think stinco would be the #1 receiver on the Steelers, you my friend are either on crack or dont know anything about football.
Since 2001....

Ocho- 684 receptions 9952 yards receiving 62 td's

Ward 771 receptions 8416 yards receiving 67 td's

Almost even in production...SO like i said, ocho 1 with Ward a very close 2nd.

If you think ocho wouldn't be a top 3 on the Steelers, you sir are a fucking moron
Stinko= no playoff wins
Ward= 2 Super bowl rings
Who would you rather be? hahaha
Jan 11, 2010 10:46pm
DeyDurkie5's avatar

DeyDurkie5

Senior Member

11,324 posts
Jan 11, 2010 10:48 PM
Al Capone wrote:
DeyDurkie5 wrote:
Al Capone wrote: If you think stinco would be the #1 receiver on the Steelers, you my friend are either on crack or dont know anything about football.
Since 2001....

Ocho- 684 receptions 9952 yards receiving 62 td's

Ward 771 receptions 8416 yards receiving 67 td's

Almost even in production...SO like i said, ocho 1 with Ward a very close 2nd.

If you think ocho wouldn't be a top 3 on the Steelers, you sir are a fucking moron
Stinko= no playoff wins
Ward= 2 Super bowl rings
Who would you rather be? hahaha

I am not arguing that you dense fuck, I am arguing that Ocho would be a number 1 receiver on the steelers, and I'm right..so lick my balls
Jan 11, 2010 10:48pm
Lovejoy1984's avatar

Lovejoy1984

Senior Member

5,277 posts
Jan 11, 2010 10:49 PM
Al,

Why does everything come back to rings with you? Is that the only thing you have to fall back on. Rings are team awards, not individual accomplishments.

Charlie Batch also has 2 SB rings, is he a better QB than Carson Palmer? Or Joe Flacco??

I would've included DA or BQ, but Batch is better than those too :)
Jan 11, 2010 10:49pm
Terry_Tate's avatar

Terry_Tate

Senior Member

7,606 posts
Jan 11, 2010 10:51 PM
T-7th in TDs amongst WRs
18th in Yards amongst WRs
17th in catches amongst WRs

All on the team that was 27th in passing attempts. I'm not arguing for him to be top 10 or anything, but he's definitely better than the 25th WR in the NFL.
Jan 11, 2010 10:51pm
A

Al Capone

18-3 since 2000

1,727 posts
Jan 11, 2010 10:53 PM
I am just saying that Stinko would have trouble finding playing time with the Steelers. You are a ratard if you think he would be the #1.
Jan 11, 2010 10:53pm
I

I Wear Pants

Senior Member

16,223 posts
Jan 11, 2010 10:55 PM
I love the Steelers and I know that Chad Johnson would be a starting receiver. He'd probably be two or maybe even three on the roster though.
Jan 11, 2010 10:55pm
A

Al Capone

18-3 since 2000

1,727 posts
Jan 11, 2010 10:55 PM
Terry_Tate wrote: T-7th in TDs amongst WRs
18th in Yards amongst WRs
17th in catches amongst WRs

All on the team that was 27th in passing attempts. I'm not arguing for him to be top 10 or anything, but he's definitely better than the 25th WR in the NFL.
#1 in running his mouth
#1 in not backing it up
Jan 11, 2010 10:55pm
DeyDurkie5's avatar

DeyDurkie5

Senior Member

11,324 posts
Jan 11, 2010 10:56 PM
Al Capone wrote: I am just saying that Stinko would have trouble finding playing time with the Steelers. You are a ratard if you think he would be the #1.
and you love steeler dick...i'm done with this argument, enjoy that ward cream sauce
Jan 11, 2010 10:56pm
Lovejoy1984's avatar

Lovejoy1984

Senior Member

5,277 posts
Jan 11, 2010 10:56 PM
Al Capone wrote: I am just saying that Stinko would have trouble finding playing time with the Steelers. You are a ratard if you think he would be the #1.
Ochocinco would be at worst the #3 for the Steelers. But he could very easily be the #1, or #2. Ward, and Holmes are very good receivers, but it isn't like either one of them are on the same level as a T.O., Jerry Rice, or Randy Moss(All-Time Greats and 1st Ballot HOF). Same goes with Ochocinco, he is very good receiver, and if he was on the Steelers, he'd have no problem seeing the field, and to think otherwise is foolish.
Jan 11, 2010 10:56pm
Terry_Tate's avatar

Terry_Tate

Senior Member

7,606 posts
Jan 11, 2010 11:00 PM
With all this arguing about the Steelers and Chad, I think the Steelers have good WRs for what they have and Chad is good for what the Bengals do. Chad can't block as well as Hines, but there's no debate he definitely runs better routes than anyone on the Steelers. Their WRs are good for just playing more or less background football as Big Ben is usually escaping the pocket and creating plays, whereas the Bengals and Carson really don't do that, he needs WRs that run crisp routes, which Chad does as good as anyone.
Jan 11, 2010 11:00pm
A

Al Capone

18-3 since 2000

1,727 posts
Jan 11, 2010 11:07 PM
DeyDurkie5 wrote:
Al Capone wrote: I am just saying that Stinko would have trouble finding playing time with the Steelers. You are a ratard if you think he would be the #1.
and you love steeler dick...i'm done with this argument, enjoy that ward cream sauce
Ward = Hall of fame
Stinko= I dont think so
Jan 11, 2010 11:07pm
DeyDurkie5's avatar

DeyDurkie5

Senior Member

11,324 posts
Jan 11, 2010 11:11 PM
Al Capone wrote:
DeyDurkie5 wrote:
Al Capone wrote: I am just saying that Stinko would have trouble finding playing time with the Steelers. You are a ratard if you think he would be the #1.
and you love steeler dick...i'm done with this argument, enjoy that ward cream sauce
Ward = Hall of fame
Stinko= I dont think so
lol I don't care if either make it, I'M A BROWNS FAN. I'm just trying to point out how biased you are
Jan 11, 2010 11:11pm
A

Al Capone

18-3 since 2000

1,727 posts
Jan 11, 2010 11:11 PM
Ask Keith Rivers what he thinks of Ward? Oh I forgot, He cant talk yet.:P
Jan 11, 2010 11:11pm
G

gut

Senior Member

15,058 posts
Jan 12, 2010 4:59 AM
You guys are crazy. I'm a Steeler fan, and Ward would not beat out Ocho. Ward has the intangibles, but Ocho is just that much more of a threat receiving. I love Ward as a player and he's my all-time favorite Steeler, but the guy can't beat man coverage any more. He makes his living against zones.

I also don't think Holmes has surpassed Ocho yet. But there's a legit debate there.
Jan 12, 2010 4:59am
Rotinaj's avatar

Rotinaj

Senior Member

7,699 posts
Jan 12, 2010 10:22 AM
Al Capone wrote:
DeyDurkie5 wrote:
Al Capone wrote: I am just saying that Stinko would have trouble finding playing time with the Steelers. You are a ratard if you think he would be the #1.
and you love steeler dick...i'm done with this argument, enjoy that ward cream sauce
Ward = Hall of fame
Stinko= I dont think so
When both careers are over "stinko" will have better career numbers than Ward.
Jan 12, 2010 10:22am
Skyhook79's avatar

Skyhook79

Senior Member

5,739 posts
Jan 12, 2010 10:33 AM
Rotinaj wrote:
Al Capone wrote:
DeyDurkie5 wrote:
Al Capone wrote: I am just saying that Stinko would have trouble finding playing time with the Steelers. You are a ratard if you think he would be the #1.
and you love steeler dick...i'm done with this argument, enjoy that ward cream sauce
Ward = Hall of fame
Stinko= I dont think so
When both careers are over "stinko" will have better career numbers than Ward.
Maybe so but he won't be a Hall of Famer and won't be the winner that Ward is and isn't that what its all about? Winning Rings and getting to the HOF?
btw- I can't stand Hines anymore than I can Chad but at least Hines backs his trash talk up.
Jan 12, 2010 10:33am