Ohio Chatter
Ohio Chatter

Forums

All Threads Serious Business Sports Politics Archive Pick 'ems Wordio
Log In Create Account

2014 General College Football Thread

Home ▸ Archive ▸ College Sports ▸ 2014 General College Football Thread
ernest_t_bass's avatar

ernest_t_bass

12th Son of the Lama

24,984 posts
Oct 19, 2014 3:36 PM
ts1227;1664770 wrote:AP Poll

1. Mississippi State (43)
2. Florida State (14)
3. Ole Miss (3)
4. Alabama
5. Auburn
6. Oregon
7. Notre Dame
8. Michigan State
9. Georgia
10. TCU

13. Ohio State
23. Marshall

http://collegefootball.ap.org/poll
Lol. Wow
Oct 19, 2014 3:36pm
S

Sonofanump

Oct 19, 2014 3:47 PM
Classyposter58;1664715 wrote:That's why screens are used, you can kinda get away with it because it happens so quick it's really bang bang. This was not
Well no. Screens are legal when a ball is caught behind the neutral zone as pass interference rules only applies to a ball that cross that plane untouched.
Oct 19, 2014 3:47pm
Heretic's avatar

Heretic

Son of the Sun

18,820 posts
Oct 19, 2014 7:18 PM
Pick6;1664751 wrote:congrats on being the better team yesterday.Keep in mind Akron is a program 1.5 seasons removed from 3 straight 1-11 seasons. Keep in mind that OU beat Akron by 37 points at Akron last season with our starting QB. Enjoy the win over Akron yesterday. One fan base is happy over a 3 point win over Akron with a freshman making his first ever start at QB. One fan base is disappointed with losing even with a freshman making his first ever start at QB. If that isn't a testament to the state of the each of the programs, I dont know what is.
Lord, full retard has been achieved when "making a point" constitutes stating the obvious. Especially considering that, as said above, Ohio is using their back-up quarterback, too, so your "we had to use a back-up" excuse has no merit.

Lol, your whole butthurt post makes me glad I didn't follow up Pittsburgh's loss to Cleveland with a snide little "man, when our team beats yours, it's just another day at the office...you beat us and it's like you just won 15 Super Bowls in one afternoon" because I realized I'd look like a whiny little bitch if I did so. And, lo and behold, you did a sparkling job of proving that to be true.
Oct 19, 2014 7:18pm
Pick6's avatar

Pick6

A USA American

14,946 posts
Oct 19, 2014 8:05 PM
Heretic;1664943 wrote:Lord, full retard has been achieved when "making a point" constitutes stating the obvious. Especially considering that, as said above, Ohio is using their back-up quarterback, too, so your "we had to use a back-up" excuse has no merit.

Lol, your whole butthurt post makes me glad I didn't follow up Pittsburgh's loss to Cleveland with a snide little "man, when our team beats yours, it's just another day at the office...you beat us and it's like you just won 15 Super Bowls in one afternoon" because I realized I'd look like a whiny little bitch if I did so. And, lo and behold, you did a sparkling job of proving that to be true.
Can anyone say run-on? Your burns might be a little better if you knew how to construct a sentence.
Oct 19, 2014 8:05pm
lhslep134's avatar

lhslep134

why so serious?

9,774 posts
Oct 19, 2014 8:24 PM
Pick6;1664751 wrote:You're program has peaked.
Pick6;1664751 wrote:
I'm okay with the loss.
No your not.






Learn the English language dumbass. This is like the 15th time you've done that




(obvious sarcasm bolded, since it will go over Pick's head)
Oct 19, 2014 8:24pm
T

Tiernan

Senior Member

13,021 posts
Oct 19, 2014 8:27 PM
Congrats to Picky, S&L and Heretic for setting the record of the most consecutive posts ever on a sports message board that pertain to Akron and OU football. Way to go dipshits clap clap clap.
Oct 19, 2014 8:27pm
gerb131's avatar

gerb131

Senior Member

9,932 posts
Oct 19, 2014 8:45 PM
How far if any does the loser of the egg bowl fall?
Oct 19, 2014 8:45pm
ernest_t_bass's avatar

ernest_t_bass

12th Son of the Lama

24,984 posts
Oct 19, 2014 8:50 PM
gerb131;1664966 wrote:How far if any does the loser of the egg bowl fall?
Since it's the SEC, the loser will prob be 1b.
Oct 19, 2014 8:50pm
believer's avatar

believer

Senior Member

8,153 posts
Oct 19, 2014 9:58 PM
gerb131;1664966 wrote:How far if any does the loser of the egg bowl fall?
At least 2 slots. That's quite a drop for an SEC team.
Oct 19, 2014 9:58pm
DeyDurkie5's avatar

DeyDurkie5

Senior Member

11,324 posts
Oct 19, 2014 10:21 PM
Pick went full bitch mode there. It's just Akron lol
Oct 19, 2014 10:21pm
Ironman92's avatar

Ironman92

Administrator

49,363 posts
Oct 19, 2014 11:03 PM
lhslep134;1664958 wrote:No your not.






Learn the English language dumbass. This is like the 15th time you've done that




(obvious sarcasm bolded, since it will go over Pick's head)
* you're
Oct 19, 2014 11:03pm
T

Tiernan

Senior Member

13,021 posts
Oct 20, 2014 8:10 AM
In Akron it's spelled yorn.
Oct 20, 2014 8:10am
Heretic's avatar

Heretic

Son of the Sun

18,820 posts
Oct 20, 2014 9:55 AM
Pick6;1664955 wrote:Can anyone say run-on? Your burns might be a little better if you knew how to construct a sentence.
Surrender accepted!
Oct 20, 2014 9:55am
lhslep134's avatar

lhslep134

why so serious?

9,774 posts
Oct 20, 2014 11:57 AM
Ironman92;1664998 wrote:* you're
Which part of my sarcasm did you not get? It was (I thought so anyways) an obvious joke making fun of Pick's utter inability to use correct grammar
Oct 20, 2014 11:57am
Midstate01's avatar

Midstate01

Senior Member

14,766 posts
Oct 20, 2014 1:21 PM
@BruceFeldmanCFB: RT @TMitrosilis: Here's a great goal line Vine of Notre Dame's PI vs. FSU. https://vine.co/v/ObOBAdPbI5a”

Yea. The offensive player definetly initiates contact and deserved the penalty.

Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk
Oct 20, 2014 1:21pm
lhslep134's avatar

lhslep134

why so serious?

9,774 posts
Oct 20, 2014 1:26 PM
Midstate01;1665086 wrote:
Yea. The offensive player definetly initiates contact and deserved the penalty.
100%, especially after ND got away with doing the same thing for a TD earlier in the game
Oct 20, 2014 1:26pm
Azubuike24's avatar

Azubuike24

Senior Member

15,933 posts
Oct 20, 2014 1:58 PM
My only thoughts on the ND/FSU call from someone who didn't give two shits who won. It's the old adage of...what's the "right" call versus what's the "typical" call.

By definition, the call was right. By definition, that call could be made on a ton of screen, sideline out and slant plays and it's ignored. It happens almost every time a team stacks one side of the field with 3 or 4 wide.

It's only magnified because of when it was called.
Oct 20, 2014 1:58pm
T

thavoice

Senior Member

14,376 posts
Oct 20, 2014 2:02 PM
Azubuike24;1665099 wrote:My only thoughts on the ND/FSU call from someone who didn't give two shits who won. It's the old adage of...what's the "right" call versus what's the "typical" call.

By definition, the call was right. By definition, that call could be made on a ton of screen, sideline out and slant plays. It happens almost every time a team stacks one side of the field with 3 or 4 wide.
I saw it for the first time this morning. We all heard about it from people on sat night and most were saying it was a 'bad' call. When I saw it I guess my first reaction was it was just too obvious. I have to error on the side that the call was the correct one even though I would ahve preferred ND to win the game.
Teams are getting better at rubbing off the DB without making the contact. When the receiver has his arms up on front of him like he is blocking...just didnt do a good enough job to make it look good.
Oct 20, 2014 2:02pm
sherm03's avatar

sherm03

I go balls deep.

7,349 posts
Oct 20, 2014 2:05 PM
I'm pretty much over it at this point. This guy breaks it down pretty well without saying one way or the other. I still think it was a bad call...but if ND can win out, they'll be in the playoffs.

http://www.wsbt.com/news/local/a-new-look-at-that-controversial-call-during-nd-vs-fsu/29231948?treets=wsbttv&tid=26514579613813&tml=wsbttv_noonheadlines&tmi=wsbttv_noonheadlines_1_11000110202014&ts=H
Oct 20, 2014 2:05pm
W

WebFire

Go Bucks!

14,779 posts
Oct 20, 2014 2:10 PM
100% the right call. It was then and is now.
Oct 20, 2014 2:10pm
lhslep134's avatar

lhslep134

why so serious?

9,774 posts
Oct 20, 2014 2:12 PM
sherm03;1665103 wrote: I still think it was a bad call
Then you're so misguided by your fandom as to be irrational.

You simply can't be blocking on a pass play and if you look at the goal line view it there was blatant blocking.
Oct 20, 2014 2:12pm
Crimson streak's avatar

Crimson streak

Senior Member

9,002 posts
Oct 20, 2014 2:14 PM
sherm03;1665103 wrote:I'm pretty much over it at this point. This guy breaks it down pretty well without saying one way or the other. I still think it was a bad call...but if ND can win out, they'll be in the playoffs.

http://www.wsbt.com/news/local/a-new-look-at-that-controversial-call-during-nd-vs-fsu/29231948?treets=wsbttv&tid=26514579613813&tml=wsbttv_noonheadlines&tmi=wsbttv_noonheadlines_1_11000110202014&ts=H
After seeing that view that's a complete bullshit call
Oct 20, 2014 2:14pm
lhslep134's avatar

lhslep134

why so serious?

9,774 posts
Oct 20, 2014 2:17 PM
Crimson streak;1665110 wrote:After seeing that view that's a complete bullshit call
That was a terrible video. The penalty was called on the holding, not on the slant.

[video][/video]

That vine I just posted shows all you need to see.
Oct 20, 2014 2:17pm
W

WebFire

Go Bucks!

14,779 posts
Oct 20, 2014 2:18 PM
Crimson streak;1665110 wrote:After seeing that view that's a complete bullshit call
Why? The offensive player drove the defensive backwards.
Oct 20, 2014 2:18pm
lhslep134's avatar

lhslep134

why so serious?

9,774 posts
Oct 20, 2014 2:20 PM
WebFire;1665117 wrote:Why? The offensive player drove the defensive backwards.
That view they showed in that video is terrible, it completely fails to show the clear penalty. Not surprised that's the view presented by the South Bend media and not the goal line view that shows the penalty
Oct 20, 2014 2:20pm