SportsAndLady;1583141 wrote:Lol sleeper..just stop.

Brandon weeden a Super Bowl QB? I need me some of that DC weed you smokin.

sleeper;1583093 wrote:Here are the QBs drafted in the top 10 of the NFL Draft since the year 2000. Guess how many have made the Super Bowl and tell me why you think Manziel or Bridgewater will be any different? Sleeper always wins.

Luck

Griffin

Tannehill

Newton

Locker

Gabbert

Bradford

Stafford

Sanchez

Ryan

Russell

Young

Leinart

Smith

Manning

Rivers

Palmer

Leftwich

Carr

Harrington

Vick

sleeper;1583197 wrote:If he played for the Seahawks, no doubt. The Seahawks did not win because of Russel Wilson; their defense and their running game were the best in the league.

SportsAndLady;1583199 wrote:That logic is so beyond flawed. Just because they didn't win because of Russell Wilson doesn't mean they can win with any QB in the league. Lol sleeper loses!

sleeper;1583200 wrote:It's about as flawed as the logic that drafted a QB #4 overall instantly makes the team a Super Bowl contender. Please tell that Russel Wilson on the Browns would make any difference at all; it wouldn't.

se-alum;1583210 wrote:So you think drafting a LB at #4 and relying on Hoyer gets them closer to a Super Bowl? LOL! Also, the Seahawks didn't build that defense by drafting LB'ers in the first round. The drafted Irvin who had only 40tkls and 2 sacks. They have only 2 first round picks on that D.

Rotinaj;1583218 wrote:So what you're saying is no team should ever draft a QB in the top 10?

Rotinaj;1583218 wrote:So what you're saying is no team should ever draft a QB in the top 10?

se-alum;1583220 wrote:Apparently LB is the most important position on a football team. He likes to talk about the Seahawks, but fails to realize they've drafted only 2 of their starting defense in the 1st round, and Earl Thomas was the highest at like #14. Nobody in any NFL front office would advise choosing a LB over a QB(the most important position in football).

sleeper;1583222 wrote:If its Peyton Manning or Andrew Luck, then yes.

se-alum;1583224 wrote:So every 10-15 years.

sleeper;1583200 wrote:It's about as flawed as the logic that drafted a QB #4 overall instantly makes the team a Super Bowl contender. Please tell that Russel Wilson on the Browns would make any difference at all; it wouldn't.

DeyDurkie5;1583241 wrote:Until we get a QB that this franchise can lean on, then everything we do is mute. This years draft has 3 QB's that talent evaluators love. That doesn't happen too often in the draft. With that said, We are only a few pieces away from being contenders. One of those is QB. If one of those QB's are there at 4, you take them. Plain and simple.

Your logic is "don't draft an unproven QB at 4, that's silly" but then, in the same breathe say "draft an unproven LB at 4!" I'm sorry but that is the dumbest logic ever. LB isn't even our top 2 biggest needs, and you want to waste a top 5 pick on that?

Did classyposter hijack your account? Because literally everyone on this thread is disagreeing with everything you have said regarding this draft.

SportsAndLady;1583243 wrote:Browns were apparently close to trading draft picks for John harbraugh

HighRoller74;1583259 wrote:I still tend to agree with Sleeper on his stance on the QB's as none of them really blow me way, nor do I feel we have to walk away with a QB early in this draft.

I'd be perfectly content with them taking a QB in the 2nd/3rd round who is the right fit, and fill some other holes on the team, rather then them taking the leftovers at the QB position.

se-alum;1583263 wrote:I don't think Farmer will take a QB just for the sake of taking a QB. If he don't like what he has to pick from at #4, I can see him going a different direction, but if the QB you like is there, but you don't take him, that's just stupid.

• Ian Rapoport ‏@RapSheet 1h
  In response to @ProFootballTalk report on #Browns nearly trading for Jim Harbaugh, #Niners source calls it “completely false. Ridiculous.”
  
  • Reply
  • Retweet
  • Favorite
  Expand
• ProFootballTalk ‏@ProFootballTalk 1h
  @RapSheet . . . Your source is lying or misinformed. #justsaying
  
  • Reply
  • Retweet
  • Favorite
  Expand
• Ian Rapoport ‏@RapSheet 1h
  @ProFootballTalk it’s actually two high-ranking Niners sources, to be specific
  
  • Reply
  • Retweet
  • Favorite
  Expand
• ProFootballTalk ‏@ProFootballTalk 1h
  @RapSheet . . . Why won't they deny it on the record? Because they can't.
  
  • Reply
  • Retweet
  • Favorite
  Expand
• 
  Jed York ‏@JedYork 34m
  @ProFootballTalk @RapSheet is this on the record? Report isn't true

HighRoller74;1583269 wrote:LOL, whats funny, is that doesn't disprove anything at all.

Because Teams NEVER lie.

HighRoller74;1583269 wrote:LOL, whats funny, is that doesn't disprove anything at all.

Because Teams NEVER lie.