This will be the finals match up no doubt.robj55;1613412 wrote:Miami and SA look like two well oiled machines tonight, look like the best two teams in the world.
Having sex is one thing, but fucking a team over, QQing and ruining your career? NahhhAutomatik;1613469 wrote:She's trash.
But would still hit.
???Commander of Awesome;1613486 wrote:Having sex is one thing, but fucking a team over, QQing and ruining your career? Nahhh
Lol really? I thought that was the girl that pacers are QQing over. WhoopsAutomatik;1613488 wrote:That .gif is Rihanna.
???Laley23;1613489 wrote:???
I was confused by your post. Now I understand you were talking about PG and Hibbert.Commander of Awesome;1613491 wrote:???
I don't think anyone will beat them in a series but the Spurs definitely have the best shot IMO.friendfromlowry;1613515 wrote:I'll pass on a San Antonio - Miami rematch. I don't think the Spurs will be able to beat them in a series.
I think anyone out of the west except the young/inexperienced Blazers will give them a huge test. But the Spurs already played one seven game series, and I wouldn't like their odds if they had to play 13-14 games between this series and the next.Rotinaj;1613522 wrote:I don't think anyone will beat them in a series but the Spurs definitely have the best shot IMO.
Absolutely, only team disciplined enough to beat them or give them a good series.Rotinaj;1613522 wrote:I don't think anyone will beat them in a series but the Spurs definitely have the best shot IMO.
Seems like they got rid of him because of BynumCommander of Awesome;1613656 wrote:Just read bynum wont be with the pacers for the rest of the playoffs. LOL what POS
Huhrobj55;1613657 wrote:Seems like they got rid of him because of Bynum
They didn't want any distractions or for him to look over his shoulder.SportsAndLady;1613673 wrote:Huh
..
Hibbert with 11 tonight already
No...your sentence literally makes no sense lol.robj55;1613681 wrote:They didn't want any distractions or for him to look over his shoulder.
That makes sense now though. Rob it was confusing because you said Bynum when you probably meant hibbert.Laley23;1613685 wrote:No...your sentence literally makes no sense lol.
I think you mean Hibbert, based on this post.
I highly, highly doubt they missed a basket.Pick6;1613743 wrote:some guy on my twitter right now is going crazy saying that washington should have two more points. didnt count Nene's made bucket with like 3:59 left I guess?
