CLEconomically Speaking;1383317 wrote:What if we are able to sign Paul Kruger or Anthony Spencer? Then assuming Sheard can make the transition, we can focus the draft on the secondary.. if Milliner is gone at six you trade down and take Rhodes or Banks. This might even be better than getting Milliner beacuse then you can take a FS with your newly acquired second round pick.

Commander of Awesome;1383430 wrote:No on corner at 6. NO.

CLEconomically Speaking;1383434 wrote:Are you opposed to trading down for a corner and a FS?

Commander of Awesome;1383455 wrote:No, but I'm opposed to reaching for a corner at #6. None of these guys are a value pick there. Rather get a decent corner in the 2nd and not fuck our salary cap down the road. Plus Eagles proved 2 stud corners doesn't equal good defense. Rather get a stud DE/pass rush at 6 and not trade down. Or trade back and get a stud OG and FS.

Commander of Awesome;1383471 wrote:Pass Rush

CLEconomically Speaking;1383502 wrote:Agreed, its not "easy" nor is it realistic.

But FB is a HUGE need. Sheard doesnt fit. And 48 million dollars says we can sign a LB

CLEconomically Speaking;1383507 wrote:Sorry, I got sick of the same old Jarvis Jones, Barkevius Mingo, Damontre Moore talk.

None of us are on the staff, so none of this matters anyway. At least be interesting.

Commander of Awesome;1383509 wrote:Alright, lets start talking about trading for Brady then!!!

CLEconomically Speaking;1383507 wrote:Sorry, I got sick of the same old Jarvis Jones, Barkevius Mingo, Damontre Moore talk.

None of us are on the staff, so none of this matters anyway. At least be interesting.

like_that;1383533 wrote:COA, please reconsider this weeks winner of ipotw.

We aren't part of the staff so instead of talking about realistic picks, lets just come up with fantasy scenarios!!!

/cleconfaillogic

Crimson streak;1383521 wrote:I would love to get Rambo in the 3rd.

BR1986FB;1383346 wrote:I think Baltimore plays more of a hybrid version running both 4-3 & 3-4. I read something about Kruger not being the best for a 3-4 which wouldn't make sense if they are in that set more than the 4-3.

CLEconomically Speaking;1383432 wrote:This guy has Jarvis Jones going 17th overall...
http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/draft/nfldraftscout-DaneBrugler
Even the guys at bleacher report arent that stupid.

Commander of Awesome;1383506 wrote:We have a lot of our own FA we need to take care of. Don't give a shit about FA either, they rarely work out. Fools Gold, how's Mario Williams working for for the Bills? LCB for us? Albert Haynesworth for the Redskins/Patriots?

Commander of Awesome;1383570 wrote:Rambo: he is a pure FS, as he absolutely HATES to make contact. Complete 180 to Elam.

Crimson streak;1383612 wrote:Exactly a ball hawking safety is what we need. We have our hard hitting safety in ward. They would compliment each other well

Pick6;1383608 wrote:Well I guess its a good thing the Browns are planning on running some sort of a hybrid as well

Stupid is drafting a guy at 6 that has a deteriorating spine. HUGE risk


Congrats on using extreme examples to attempt to make your point.

Peyton Manning
Brandon Carr
Vincent Jackson
Cortland Finnegan
Tracy Porter
Curtis Lofton
Brandon Lloyd
Ben Jarvis Green Ellis
Geoff Schwartz
Mario Manningam
Pierre Garcon
Laron Landry
Dan Connor
Cedric Benson
Martellus Bennet

Were all signed to new teams in 2012 and were pretty damn important to their team

like_that;1383616 wrote:Did you even bother to check the stats of the guys you listed? Cedric Benson and Mario Manningham.... LMFAO