2013 Cleveland Browns Thread: RIP Chud

Home Archive Pro Sports 2013 Cleveland Browns Thread: RIP Chud
CLEconomically Speaking's avatar

CLEconomically Speaking

Perplexed by Airplanes

401 posts
Feb 4, 2013 11:09 AM
Terry_Tate;1381089 wrote:Cleveland is 66/1 odds to win the Super Bowl next year. Place your bets now!
$500 x 66 = house paid off
Feb 4, 2013 11:09am
wes_mantooth's avatar

wes_mantooth

Tomfoolery & shenanigans

17,977 posts
Feb 4, 2013 12:16 PM
SportsAndLady;1380721 wrote:That was really bad.

But I really think every GM in the NFL would have taken Russell #1.
this may be true, but any normal person could see he would flop. He had an inconsistent college career that was highlighted by lighting up a terrible ND defense in a bowl game. The main talk was that he could throw the ball a long way....hell, so could Jeff George. It is so retarded that all these gms fall in love with certain things and don't take into account things like decision making and other things that really make a difference.
Feb 4, 2013 12:16pm
se-alum's avatar

se-alum

The Biggest Boss

13,948 posts
Feb 4, 2013 12:51 PM
I don't blame any GM for their picks if they were working under Al Davis at the time. Let's be honest, he made the picks.
Feb 4, 2013 12:51pm
hasbeen's avatar

hasbeen

Excuse me, Flo?

6,504 posts
Feb 4, 2013 1:18 PM
CLEconomically Speaking;1381386 wrote:$500 x 66 = house paid off
better tell your dad!
Feb 4, 2013 1:18pm
like_that's avatar

like_that

1st Team All-PWN

26,625 posts
Feb 5, 2013 8:51 AM
[h=3]Cleveland's need in the 3-4 [/h]January, 31, 2013 Jan 31
10:59
AM ET

By Tim Kavanagh | ESPN.com The Cleveland Browns have made the decision to push forward with a switch to a 3-4 alignment on defense, led by Ray Horton, the architect of the same in Arizona last season. We've seen a number of opinions on how they'll go about doing this, as well as what needs remain to be filled for it to happen.

In comments Wednesday, former Browns LB Scott Fujita -- who has played both in a 3-4 and a 4-3 system during his NFL career -- addressed the issues the Browns will face, and how they may overcome them with a player currently on the roster. The biggest hurdle appears to be finding a strong-side OLB to play opposite Jabaal Sheard, who will be moving to the weak-side OLB position from his DE spot.

"If you have a solid Sam [strong-side linebacker] like a Chris Gocong, who can set the edge [against the run], drop back [in pass coverage], and rush a little bit, and a stand-up, open side end/outside linebacker like Sheard, while keeping your interior defensive linemen on half a man rather than head up, then you can have some flexibility," Fujita explained, per ESPN Cleveland's Tony Grossi. "From that front, it's easy to slide the Sam back into a stack position, move the interior tackles over a gap, and put the open end's hand back in the dirt, and you've got a traditional 4-3 'over' front."

Whether it's Gocong or a player they find in free agency -- Anthony Spencer is mentioned a lot -- or the draft (which happens to be chock full of players of this ilk), this will be the big question mark as we transition into the 2013 campaign.
Feb 5, 2013 8:51am
Commander of Awesome's avatar

Commander of Awesome

Senior Pwner

23,151 posts
Feb 5, 2013 9:19 AM
SMH, really hate the move to a 3-4.
Feb 5, 2013 9:19am
bases_loaded's avatar

bases_loaded

Senior Member

6,912 posts
Feb 5, 2013 9:28 AM
Commander of Awesome;1381923 wrote:SMH, really hate the move to a 3-4.

I really hate fans that want a coach to run a certain scheme.
Feb 5, 2013 9:28am
Commander of Awesome's avatar

Commander of Awesome

Senior Pwner

23,151 posts
Feb 5, 2013 10:38 AM
bases_loaded;1381926 wrote:I really hate fans that want a coach to run a certain scheme.
You're right, we should go back to the Patty Derpmur Offensive scheme as well! /sarcasm
Feb 5, 2013 10:38am
bases_loaded's avatar

bases_loaded

Senior Member

6,912 posts
Feb 5, 2013 10:41 AM
Commander of Awesome;1381989 wrote:You're right, we should go back to the Patty Derpmur Offensive scheme as well! /sarcasm

We have one of the top defensive coordinators in the game. Let him get his guys for his scheme. That has a lot better chance of working than the opposite. I'm sure you're on speed dial though if it fails. Now back to minimizing the cheetoh stains on your shirt so mommy don't get mad.
Feb 5, 2013 10:41am
shook_17's avatar

shook_17

Senior Member

3,023 posts
Feb 5, 2013 10:42 AM
Who cares? Next year it will be the same shit. 4-12 after three years chud will be fired along with banner and Lombardi then we will switch back to the 4-3.
Feb 5, 2013 10:42am
Commander of Awesome's avatar

Commander of Awesome

Senior Pwner

23,151 posts
Feb 5, 2013 10:49 AM
bases_loaded;1381998 wrote:We have one of the top defensive coordinators in the game. Let him get his guys for his scheme. That has a lot better chance of working than the opposite. I'm sure you're on speed dial though if it fails. Now back to minimizing the cheetoh stains on your shirt so mommy don't get mad.
We do? 17th ranked in terms of points, 28th in rushing yards. Nice fail buddy. Glad you know best though :rolleyes:

Man I love it when stats come back to bite people in the ass.
Feb 5, 2013 10:49am
bases_loaded's avatar

bases_loaded

Senior Member

6,912 posts
Feb 5, 2013 10:51 AM
Commander of Awesome;1382009 wrote:We do? 17th ranked in terms of points, 28th in rushing yards. Nice fail buddy. Glad you know best though :rolleyes:

Man I love it when stats come back to bite people in the ass.

How did they do before they had guys like you in at QB? Their offense was turrible.

Hate when logic gets in the way of stats. Back to the couch. Cheetos and Mt Dew
Feb 5, 2013 10:51am
mucalum49's avatar

mucalum49

Senior Member

1,639 posts
Feb 5, 2013 10:55 AM
Commander of Awesome;1382009 wrote:We do? 17th ranked in terms of points, 28th in rushing yards. Nice fail buddy. Glad you know best though :rolleyes:

Man I love it when stats come back to bite people in the ass.
Come on COA I know you're better than that. Just because you don't like the 3-4 don't make it sound like Horton isn't good at what he coached in Arizona. As a Browns fan you know teams with terrible offenses appear to have shitty defenses because of how long they play. Break it down to how they perform per possession and you'll see Arizona had a better defense than the Browns.

"In 2012, Horton guided a defensive unit that led the NFL in passer rating allowed (71.2) and interception percentage (4.4). His defense also ranked second in the NFL in interceptions (22) and third-down efficiency (32.9 percent), third in red zone defense (44.4 percent) and fourth in takeaways (33). The defense also ranked fifth in passing defense (200.8 ypg), first downs allowed (288) and points allowed per drive (1.42)."

http://www.cleveland.com/browns/index.ssf/2013/01/ray_horton_hired_as_defensive.html

Feb 5, 2013 10:55am
Commander of Awesome's avatar

Commander of Awesome

Senior Pwner

23,151 posts
Feb 5, 2013 10:58 AM
bases_loaded;1382011 wrote:How did they do before they had guys like you in at QB? Their offense was turrible.

Hate when logic gets in the way of stats. Back to the couch. Cheetos and Mt Dew
lol I see, another cheetos joke! Since it wasn't funny the first time, def funny the second time! /sarcasm

They had a good defense for the first 4 games of the season. You think the Browns QB situation is any better than theirs? Not sure what a QB has to do with the defense, unless you're going to cite the TOP argument, which I will just tell you if a fail argument and I will pwn you stats again on that.

Back to your trailer kitchen bench with your Doritos taco bell! /bases_failed
Feb 5, 2013 10:58am
Commander of Awesome's avatar

Commander of Awesome

Senior Pwner

23,151 posts
Feb 5, 2013 11:00 AM
mucalum49;1382014 wrote:Come on COA I know you're better than that. Just because you don't like the 3-4 don't make it sound like Horton isn't good at what he coached in Arizona. As a Browns fan you know teams with terrible offenses appear to have shitty defenses because of how long they play. Break it down to how they perform per possession and you'll see Arizona had a better defense than the Browns.

"In 2012, Horton guided a defensive unit that led the NFL in passer rating allowed (71.2) and interception percentage (4.4). His defense also ranked second in the NFL in interceptions (22) and third-down efficiency (32.9 percent), third in red zone defense (44.4 percent) and fourth in takeaways (33). The defense also ranked fifth in passing defense (200.8 ypg), first downs allowed (288) and points allowed per drive (1.42)."

http://www.cleveland.com/browns/index.ssf/2013/01/ray_horton_hired_as_defensive.html

As you know Mucalum, take aways for a defense are completyely inconsistent and less reliable that a MLB bullpen from year to year. Look at the Bengals with Palmer the year they played the Steelers in the post season. Defense was #1 in take aways, next season middle of the pack. You CAN NOT rely on ints to make your defense. What you can rely on is STOPPING THE RUN. Which they were fucking terrible at. People in this thread last year when the Browns were ranked 10th pointed that out. We were the #1 Pass def that year, which ppl pointed to being a flaw bc we couldnt stop anyone on the ground. Come on guys, use your fucking heads.
Feb 5, 2013 11:00am
Commander of Awesome's avatar

Commander of Awesome

Senior Pwner

23,151 posts
Feb 5, 2013 11:04 AM
"Can't stop the run? You cant stop shit, YOU ARE SHIT! HIT THE BRICKS PAL And BEAT IT because you are out!"
Feb 5, 2013 11:04am
mucalum49's avatar

mucalum49

Senior Member

1,639 posts
Feb 5, 2013 11:05 AM
Commander of Awesome;1382019 wrote:As you know Mucalum, take aways for a defense are completyely inconsistent and less reliable that a MLB bullpen from year to year. Look at the Bengals with Palmer the year they played the Steelers in the post season. Defense was #1 in take aways, next season middle of the pack. You CAN NOT rely on ints to make your defense. What you can rely on is STOPPING THE RUN. Which they were fucking terrible at. People in this thread last year when the Browns were ranked 10th pointed that out. We were the #1 Pass def that year, which ppl pointed to being a flaw bc we couldnt stop anyone on the ground. Come on guys, use your fucking heads.
Agreed. However using last years total stats to prove your point that Horton isn't a good DC is ok? Yet using stats to say bases_loaded may not have been reaching saying we have a top DC is not ok? Got it now..
Feb 5, 2013 11:05am
Commander of Awesome's avatar

Commander of Awesome

Senior Pwner

23,151 posts
Feb 5, 2013 11:06 AM
Also another point with defenses and QB. If you have a good QB and a high powered offense, than you're putting up a lot of points and making the other team throw it to catch up. Which equals yards which, anyone? THat's RIGHT Causes you're defensive rankings to go down. Nice using your brains fail guys.
Feb 5, 2013 11:06am
Commander of Awesome's avatar

Commander of Awesome

Senior Pwner

23,151 posts
Feb 5, 2013 11:07 AM
mucalum49;1382027 wrote:Agreed. However using last years total stats to prove your point that Horton isn't a good DC is ok? Yet using stats to say bases_loaded may not have been reaching saying we have a top DC is not ok? Got it now..
Anyway you look at the stats, Horton isn't a top DC. Not sure what you're getting at.
Feb 5, 2013 11:07am
shook_17's avatar

shook_17

Senior Member

3,023 posts
Feb 5, 2013 11:17 AM
Who cares? Next year it will be the same shit. 4-12 after three years chud will be fired along with banner and Lombardi then we will switch back to the 4-3.
Feb 5, 2013 11:17am
Pick6's avatar

Pick6

A USA American

14,946 posts
Feb 5, 2013 11:20 AM
shook_17;1381999 wrote:Who cares? Next year it will be the same shit. 4-12 after three years chud will be fired along with banner and Lombardi then we will switch back to the 4-3.
shook_17;1382049 wrote:Who cares? Next year it will be the same shit. 4-12 after three years chud will be fired along with banner and Lombardi then we will switch back to the 4-3.
You said that already.


THE WORLD IS ENDING
Feb 5, 2013 11:20am
Commander of Awesome's avatar

Commander of Awesome

Senior Pwner

23,151 posts
Feb 5, 2013 11:22 AM
Pick6;1382058 wrote:You said that already.


THE WORLD IS ENDING
Browns are moving to LA next year so who cares.
Feb 5, 2013 11:22am
se-alum's avatar

se-alum

The Biggest Boss

13,948 posts
Feb 5, 2013 11:25 AM
Shouldn't matter what the defense does. Weeden is now in an offense that suits him, and he will most likely light it up.
Feb 5, 2013 11:25am
like_that's avatar

like_that

1st Team All-PWN

26,625 posts
Feb 5, 2013 11:43 AM
Who cares? Next year it will be the same shit. 4-12 after three years chud will be fired along with banner and Lombardi then we will switch back to the 4-3.
Feb 5, 2013 11:43am
CLEconomically Speaking's avatar

CLEconomically Speaking

Perplexed by Airplanes

401 posts
Feb 5, 2013 11:44 AM
Commander of Awesome;1382016 wrote:lol I see, another cheetos joke! Since it wasn't funny the first time, def funny the second time! /sarcasm

They had a good defense for the first 4 games of the season. You think the Browns QB situation is any better than theirs? Not sure what a QB has to do with the defense, unless you're going to cite the TOP argument, which I will just tell you if a fail argument and I will pwn you stats again on that.

Back to your trailer kitchen bench with your Doritos taco bell! /bases_failed
Cheetos jokes were funny both times. Doritos joke was uninspired. You're better than that. Try again.
Feb 5, 2013 11:44am