BR1986FB;1492437 wrote:Agreed. I don't want a "tweener" season.
...and yet at best that's what this year is looking like....although that's obviously a step forward.
BR1986FB;1492437 wrote:Agreed. I don't want a "tweener" season.
Con_Alma;1492441 wrote:...and yet at best that's what this year is looking like....although that's obviously a step forward.
My "at best" comment was my opinion as a response to it being a "tweener" season as opposed to a specific record.SportsAndLady;1492442 wrote:Anything can happen. But no way is this an "at best" 8-8 season.
Agreed. I'm still sticking to "wildcard."SportsAndLady;1492442 wrote:Anything can happen. But no way is this an "at best" 8-8 season.
Bills will have Manuel back in week 2. No reason for them to trade for Campbell.bases_loaded;1492430 wrote:Week 4 is for guys fighting for a roster spot and being showcased for trades. How the Jets or Bills haven't called us about Campbell I don't understand. But maybe they will after tomorrow nights game.
Con_Alma;1492444 wrote:My "at best" comment was my opinion as a response to it being a "tweener" season as opposed to a specific record.
I have never addressed 8-8 nor any record. Why do you keep referring to that as it relates to me?SportsAndLady;1492459 wrote:Well your opinion is retarded. 8-8 at best is an asinine prediction for a team with some resemblance of promise.
Why not indeed. I don't dispel the possibility. I do acknowledge the unlikeliness of it depending on what you think breaking out is.BR1986FB;1492463 wrote:There are teams that breakout every year. Last year it was the Colts & Vikings. Why not the Browns?
Con_Alma;1492462 wrote:I have never addressed 8-8 nor any record. Why do you keep referring to that as it relates to me?
This is exactly how I feel.Commander of Awesome;1492473 wrote: Matt Williamson ‏@WilliamsonNFL 5s If EVERYthing goes right (& it won't), I see 9-7 as best case for CLEV...that aint so bad folks
Rotinaj;1492476 wrote:Someone who expects this team to go out and win 9 or 10 games please go through the schedule and list those wins. This playoff or bust mentality some have is mind boggling to me.
Weeden can stll have a promising year and only get 8 wins. Can't possibly predict that all losses will fall on him.BR1986FB;1492428 wrote:If they only win 7 or 8, I think we see another blowup at the QB spot. He's either going to have to play off the charts or I think they will draft their "QB to be" next April.
Ummm? If using logic while creating expectations for my favorite teams makes me pathetic then so be it.SportsAndLady;1492486 wrote:No one expects it at least not that I see on here. Just saying it isn't impossible.
Honestly if you don't, as a fan, have a playoff t bust mentality going into the season...well that's just pathetic lol
"I'm really looking for a good 7-9 season this year." What kinda weak ass shit is that? Are we that engrained in bad football that we can't expect a playoff appearance?
BR1986FB;1492505 wrote:The 2007 season came out of nowhere.
Rotinaj;1492503 wrote:Ummm? If using logic while creating expectations for my favorite teams makes me pathetic then so be it.
I was on the Aaron Curry train as well. Really did not want Crabbtree that year.BR1986FB;1492502 wrote:I can remember when many, including myself, wanted Aaron Curry in the draft. That bust retired today at the age of 27.
Rotinaj;1492521 wrote:I already said multiple times that 9 wins is a possibility. I just don't agree the whole season is a bust if we go out and win 7 or 8 games, show some nice growth on both sides of the ball and at least compete in every game.
Agreed. Teams step back all of the time. I wouldn't be shocked if the Colts take a step back and don't get in this year. In fact, I expect it. They had a cakewalk for a schedule last year.SportsAndLady;1492525 wrote:Never said the season is a bust. My point was 8-8 or 4-12 were still out of the playoffs. Which, as a fan, is what I want.
There's no guarantee that if we go 8-8 this year we'll improve the following year to 10-6.