Reps that is awesome.ts1227;1343870 wrote:
I have thought traditionaly of Wisky as being second best in conference for football, so they belong opposite of TOSU.Cat Food Flambe';1344051 wrote:Basing divisions on current football "balance" is kind of short-sighted - who knows where things will be in five years, Only tOSU has been a consistent powerhouse over the last 15 years - and while PSU is currently basking in the "it feels so good when they first quit beating me" glow, they're going to come down with a bump in the next several years as the scholarship limits kick in.
Go with the East/West split, but put Whisky in the "east" and keep both Indiana in the West, then adjust for two more members later.
This. Put Maryland in the Legends with the rest of the M/N Schools. That's how we figured out which school was in which division last time; Legends-M Schools, N Schools, Iowa.stlouiedipalma;1342483 wrote:You've got to split the new boys up. Leave Illinois where they are and put Maryland and Rutgers in separate divisions. You can flip a coin as far as I'm concerned, but I wouldn't put them together.
osu, both michigan schools, psu and wisconsin all in the same division? bo pelini would have a permanent erection if this happenedCat Food Flambe';1344051 wrote:Basing divisions on current football "balance" is kind of short-sighted - who knows where things will be in five years, Only tOSU has been a consistent powerhouse over the last 15 years - and while PSU is currently basking in the "it feels so good when they first quit beating me" glow, they're going to come down with a bump in the next several years as the scholarship limits kick in.
Go with the East/West split, but put Whisky in the "east" and keep both Indiana in the West, then adjust for two more members later.
