redstreak one;1639186 wrote:Pike county could lose 600 clean up jobs at the uranium enrichment plant soon. The DOD had said they would clean up the site, now they say no more funding. 50+ years this plant enriched uranium to weapons grade. The ground water and surrounding land has been lroven to be well over the safe limit for uranium. Obama wants 2 billion for illegal immigrants, but wont clean up his backyard!

gut;1639241 wrote:But you're talking flyover land.

I've always joked about how desperaate the Obama's were to be celebrities and part of that circle. Turns out they're looking for a home in CA!

gut;1639008 wrote:This is why it's hard to have discussions with you "like a reasonable person". You make ridiculous statements/claims, then spam us with charts that you think supports your point but usally doesn't (and often actually refutes it).

Like where in hell do you get the idea that interest rates are linked to rental rates

redstreak one;1639186 wrote:Pike county could lose 600 clean up jobs at the uranium enrichment plant soon. The DOD had said they would clean up the site, now they say no more funding. 50+ years this plant enriched uranium to weapons grade. The ground water and surrounding land has been lroven to be well over the safe limit for uranium. Obama wants 2 billion for illegal immigrants, but wont clean up his backyard!

ptown_trojans_1;1639475 wrote:Funding comes from the DOE, not DOD as the DOE controls all the nuclear weapons complex facilities as well as the cleanup.
DOD only pays for the delivery systems (subs, missiles, and bombers)
And, as I recall, the DOE put the funds in there for FY14. $155Million for Portsmouth.
http://www.energyca.org/PDF/zTerryT.pdf

So, Obama has done his part. Point your finger at Congress to approve the amount. Simple as that.
It is not just Portsmouth that is getting the shaft on funding for cleanup, it is Paducah, Savannah River, Pantex, and the huge Sanford plant in Washington.

BoatShoes;1639431 wrote:I stopped reading here.

OMG do you know what the rentier class is he who calls others ignorant?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rentier

LOL

HelloAgain;1639482 wrote:

SportsAndLady;1639485 wrote:Those are not funny.

HelloAgain;1639491 wrote:Obama has you so rattled it's outstanding.

SportsAndLady;1639492 wrote:Has nothing to do with Obama. You've posted 3 or 4 of those and they just aren't very funny.

SportsAndLady;1589050 wrote:Fucking stupid. This guy sucks at his job yet because he has the minority's vote/side he can do stupid shit like this and no one will say anything.

HelloAgain;1639495 wrote:They are mocking the people who blame Obama for everything wrong in their life, which may hit a little close to home for you.

BGFalcons82;1639497 wrote:In an amazing irony

I'm waiting for you to post the same memes/gifs wherein y'all blame Bush43 for all of today's ills even though W hasn't seen DC in nearly 2,000 days.

HelloAgain;1639495 wrote:They are mocking the people who blame Obama for everything wrong in their life, which may hit a little close to home for you.

HelloAgain;1639498 wrote: Haven't seen any of that. Mostly this just seems to be a circle jerk of people reaffirming one another's existing opinions. But I'll keep a look out.

BGFalcons82;1639502 wrote:The rulers blame W every day for something that's gone wrong.

BGFalcons82;1639502 wrote:You don't have to look very hard. The rulers blame W every day for something that's gone wrong. For a cesspool full of it, check out the reactions to the VA scandal a few months ago.

gut;1639483 wrote:LMFAO....I read it as "renter" because "rentier" is an obscure term rarely seen or used. It's the sort of term someone drops to impress people who don't know better, but for people who do it's a dead give away that someone is about to drop some ignorant bullshit.

You should have kept reading and you might have learned something about asset prices. Renter or rentier, you're wrong in either case (capital gains for the latter offsetting loss of income, if any). But I have 0 interest in debating asset pricing and capital returns with you as this point illustrates you're rather ignorant of both.

Yeah, Wall Street has really struggled in the low-interest rate environment. Did you even attempt to think before you made that post? LOL, the WSJ wants to raise rates to benefit the evil, greedy rent seekers? Do you actually read the WSJ on a daily basis?!?

angryjohn;1639580 wrote:Watch how Obama wastes our money for so boys in uniform could get new useless toys, [video]www.youtube.com/watch?v=qckhoMbgoo8[/video]

BoatShoes;1639509 wrote:Mad you wasted a post talking about rent prices I see.