Ohio Chatter
Ohio Chatter

Forums

All Threads Serious Business Sports Politics Archive Pick 'ems
Log In Create Account

Disgusted with obama administration - Part II

Home ▸ Archive ▸ Politics ▸ Disgusted with obama administration - Part II
Q

QuakerOats

Senior Member

8,740 posts
Sep 12, 2013 1:39 PM
BoatShoes;1499464 wrote:Al Gore didn't invent the internet but Heritage was definitely the origin of Obamacare.


http://healthcarereform.procon.org/sourcefiles/1989_assuring_affordable_health_care_for_all_americans.pdf

Page 6. "mandate all households obtain adequate insurance"

Hilarious, absolutely hilarious.

Let's review one more time: obamaKare was passed 100.000% by radical left-wing democrats/socialists/marxists. Not one single solitary republican or conservative was anywhere close to this catastrophe. This is 100% liberal legislation ---- OWN IT!
Sep 12, 2013 1:39pm
B

BoatShoes

Senior Member

5,703 posts
Sep 12, 2013 1:43 PM
QuakerOats;1499469 wrote:Hilarious, absolutely hilarious.

Let's review one more time: obamaKare was passed 100.000% by radical left-wing democrats/socialists/marxists. Not one single solitary republican or conservative was anywhere close to this catastrophe. This is 100% liberal legislation ---- OWN IT!
Maybe the trick is for democrats to come out in support of all the other conservative ideas and the cognitive dissonance will be so great that QuakerOats ends up advocating for liberalism???
Sep 12, 2013 1:43pm
Q

QuakerOats

Senior Member

8,740 posts
Sep 12, 2013 1:54 PM
I, as do most conservatives, stand for principles; which explains much about the liberals' inability to understand the likes of The Tea Party Patriots, for instance. Certain concepts have a way of eluding the grasp of the common liberal intellectual pinot grigio community.
Sep 12, 2013 1:54pm
B

BoatShoes

Senior Member

5,703 posts
Sep 12, 2013 2:03 PM
QuakerOats;1499476 wrote:I, as do most conservatives, stand for principles; which explains much about the liberals' inability to understand the likes of The Tea Party Patriots, for instance. Certain concepts have a way of eluding the grasp of the common liberal intellectual pinot grigio community.
Right in the Heritage reasoning was that its support for the so-called "individual mandate" was the belief in the principle of personal responsibility.
Sep 12, 2013 2:03pm
Q

QuakerOats

Senior Member

8,740 posts
Sep 12, 2013 2:20 PM
Please refer to post #1197 above, and at any time in the future should you have additional senior moments. Or, simply write with pen on your left hand - 100% - and it will be a steady and handy reminder of the most salient number from said post, #1197.
Sep 12, 2013 2:20pm
believer's avatar

believer

Senior Member

8,153 posts
Sep 14, 2013 9:40 AM
QuakerOats;1499500 wrote:Lerner specifically targeted Tea Party .......... can we not just throw her liberal arse in jail already????????
"Listen, sir. Would you like my minions to target your arse this spring? No? Then back off!" - Lerner

Sep 14, 2013 9:40am
Q

QuakerOats

Senior Member

8,740 posts
Sep 16, 2013 4:17 PM
In an editorial, the Detroit News (9/15) said the Environmental Protection Agency will soon issue emissions caps “that will effectively ban the construction of new coal plants in the” US. “For the first time ever, EPA is becoming a regulator of energy,” Ross Eisenberg, Vice President of Energy and Resources Policy at the National Association of Manufacturers told the Wall Street Journal. “The rule they’re putting out there is going to force choices as to which energy you use, and that’s a very disturbing concept for manufacturers.” Clearly, the Detroit News said, “these issues are a matter of public policy and need to be debated by elected representatives.”
Under the headline, “War On Coal: Obama Doesn’t Do Pinpricks,” the National Review (9/13, Payne) “Planet Gore” blog reported the “EPA is plotting an attack on the” energy sector “that would decimate future coal-plant construction in the name of fighting global warming.” “For the first time ever, EPA is becoming a regulator of energy. The rule they’re putting out there is going to force choices as to which energy you use, and that’s a very disturbing concept for manufacturers,” Ross Eisenberg of the National Association of Manufacturers told the Wall Street Journal. Congress “should protest this ill-conceived war on coal.”



The radical obama regime somehow wants the masses to believe they care about jobs and affordable energy, yet they systematically have gone about dismantling the coal industry through administrative fiat. The marxist dictatorship sees no bounds.


Change we can believe in ...
Sep 16, 2013 4:17pm
Devils Advocate's avatar

Devils Advocate

Brudda o da bomber

4,539 posts
Sep 16, 2013 4:20 PM
QuakerOats;1501534 wrote:In an editorial, the Detroit News (9/15) said the Environmental Protection Agency will soon issue emissions caps “that will effectively ban the construction of new coal plants in the” US. “For the first time ever, EPA is becoming a regulator of energy,” Ross Eisenberg, Vice President of Energy and Resources Policy at the National Association of Manufacturers told the Wall Street Journal. “The rule they’re putting out there is going to force choices as to which energy you use, and that’s a very disturbing concept for manufacturers.” Clearly, the Detroit News said, “these issues are a matter of public policy and need to be debated by elected representatives.”
Under the headline, “War On Coal: Obama Doesn’t Do Pinpricks,” the National Review (9/13, Payne) “Planet Gore” blog reported the “EPA is plotting an attack on the” energy sector “that would decimate future coal-plant construction in the name of fighting global warming.” “For the first time ever, EPA is becoming a regulator of energy. The rule they’re putting out there is going to force choices as to which energy you use, and that’s a very disturbing concept for manufacturers,” Ross Eisenberg of the National Association of Manufacturers told the Wall Street Journal. Congress “should protest this ill-conceived war on coal.”



The radical obama regime somehow wants the masses to believe they care about jobs and affordable energy, yet they systematically have gone about dismantling the coal industry through administrative fiat. The marxist dictatorship sees no bounds.


Change we can believe in ...
Sep 16, 2013 4:20pm
IggyPride00's avatar

IggyPride00

Senior Member

6,482 posts
Sep 16, 2013 6:16 PM
The radical obama regime somehow wants the masses to believe they care about jobs and affordable energy, yet they systematically have gone about dismantling the coal industry through administrative fiat. The marxist dictatorship sees no bounds.
Thank Anthony Kennedy for that.

His voting with the liberal judges to give the EPA power to do basically anything and everything it wanted with regard to CO2 is why we are where we are.
Sep 16, 2013 6:16pm
Q

QuakerOats

Senior Member

8,740 posts
Sep 17, 2013 8:32 AM
QuakerOats;1499500 wrote:http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/sep/12/emails-ois-lerner-specifically-targeted-tea-party/


Lerner specifically targeted Tea Party .......... can we not just throw her liberal arse in jail already????????

ahh, she and the other criminals have hired the biggest guns to defend themselves. Why do that if you did nothing wrong?


http://www.politico.com/story/2013/09/irs-workers-turn-to-elite-dc-lawyers-for-defense-96885.html?hp=l7
Sep 17, 2013 8:32am
B

BoatShoes

Senior Member

5,703 posts
Sep 17, 2013 12:26 PM
UPDATE: It appears that Buffett made his anti-Obamacare comments in 2010, thereby showing that he, like most of the American people, has opposed Obamacare since even before it was passed—a point that Mark Hemingway addressed yesterday in response to USA Today’simplication that Americans’ widespread dislike of Obamacare is mostly attributable to Republicans’ efforts to fight it.
^^^LOL
Sep 17, 2013 12:26pm
ptown_trojans_1's avatar

ptown_trojans_1

Moderator

7,632 posts
Sep 17, 2013 12:26 PM
1. Comments were made in 2010, get new comments he has made on it. Maybe he supports it now, maybe he doesn't....
Although we should attack rising costs, but you know what, the R's have yet to address it at all...

2. That is Rasmussen, which has limited to no credibility after the 2012 election.
Weak
Sep 17, 2013 12:26pm
ptown_trojans_1's avatar

ptown_trojans_1

Moderator

7,632 posts
Sep 17, 2013 1:55 PM
Here is an idea:
Instead of complaining more and more about this is a total failure, and then defunding it so it is a total failure, how about the R's grow up.
How about they put together a plan that says, Obamacare was a flawed idea, here is the proper way to do it, if we do x, y, and z.
Take what Obama started, tweak it, make it better.
That would be a hell of a idea, that I would whole heartily support.
But, instead it is the typical BS blame game by the parties.
Sep 17, 2013 1:55pm
J

jmog

Senior Member

6,567 posts
Sep 17, 2013 1:57 PM
ptown_trojans_1;1502323 wrote:Here is an idea:
Instead of complaining more and more about this is a total failure, and then defunding it so it is a total failure, how about the R's grow up.
How about they put together a plan that says, Obamacare was a flawed idea, here is the proper way to do it, if we do x, y, and z.
Take what Obama started, tweak it, make it better.
That would be a hell of a idea, that I would whole heartily support.
But, instead it is the typical BS blame game by the parties.
The Rs had ideas back in the original debate but since the Ds had a majority in both Houses they were told to sit down and shut up.

Please don't act like the Ds were all about getting consensus across the aisle when the ACA was shoved through.
Sep 17, 2013 1:57pm
ptown_trojans_1's avatar

ptown_trojans_1

Moderator

7,632 posts
Sep 17, 2013 2:11 PM
jmog;1502324 wrote:The Rs had ideas back in the original debate but since the Ds had a majority in both Houses they were told to sit down and shut up.

Please don't act like the Ds were all about getting consensus across the aisle when the ACA was shoved through.
I agree, but that was 2010.
How about they bring those back.
Be the responsible party now.
Do the all out media blitz that they can, instead of the defunding bs.
Sep 17, 2013 2:11pm
Q

QuakerOats

Senior Member

8,740 posts
Sep 17, 2013 2:38 PM
ptown_trojans_1;1502323 wrote:Here is an idea:
Instead of complaining more and more about this is a total failure, and then defunding it so it is a total failure, how about the R's grow up.
How about they put together a plan that says, Obamacare was a flawed idea, here is the proper way to do it, if we do x, y, and z.
Take what Obama started, tweak it, make it better.
That would be a hell of a idea, that I would whole heartily support.
But, instead it is the typical BS blame game by the parties.

The R's have put forth many great ideas; they never are reported upon because the media is complicit with the admin in continually floating the ridiculous notion that the R's are the party of "no". It is getting reallllllyyyy old.

Bottom line; Harry Reid will never let a republican idea see the light of day in the senate, nor would the imposter in the WH ever sign anything. Hence we are stuck with this horrific trainwreck unless it can somehow be defunded. Again, all of this brought to all of us 100% by democrats in a force-fed manner. To somehow try and twist that into a republican problem is ludicrous. How about the democrats grow up, admit they made a huge mistake, and take corrective action, after all, they created this mess. Where is their responsibility?????????????
Sep 17, 2013 2:38pm