bigdaddy2003;916132 wrote:Can anyone see why Ann Coulter is so big on the guy?

Belly35;920444 wrote:Belly !

bigdaddy2003;920890 wrote:Perry falling and Christie not running are fine by me.

2kool4skool;921094 wrote:The bigger question: Who cares what Ann Coulter thinks?

Cleveland Buck;921488 wrote:I like the way Cain presents himself up there and he does have some decent ideas. I do appreciate that he isn't a typical politician up there, although he flip-flops just as much as they do. Here are my issues with him.

1. He insisted for years that there was no need to audit the Federal Reserve until he changed his tune recently because it is the popular stance. If he was president obviously he wouldn't support it.

2. He questioned the constitutionality of the president assassinating American citizens without due process earlier this year when they were trying to get the guy they just killed. Then after they killed him he was all for it.

3. His 9-9-9 plan sounds good, but in reality all it does is add a VAT tax. He will never get a 9% flat income tax or a 9% corporate tax through Congress, so in reality we will just end up with the same tax code we have now plus a 9% VAT. No thanks.

4. He supported bailing out the banks at the time and still does.

5. Supports the Patriot Act and also the assassination of Al-Awlaki, so our constitutional rights are obviously of no consequence to him.

I would rather not vote at all then vote for Cain, even if I do like him better than the other clowns like Romney, Perry, Christie, and company.

Cleveland Buck;921488 wrote:I like the way Cain presents himself up there and he does have some decent ideas. I do appreciate that he isn't a typical politician up there, although he flip-flops just as much as they do. Here are my issues with him.

1. He insisted for years that there was no need to audit the Federal Reserve until he changed his tune recently because it is the popular stance. If he was president obviously he wouldn't support it.

2. He questioned the constitutionality of the president assassinating American citizens without due process earlier this year when they were trying to get the guy they just killed. Then after they killed him he was all for it.

3. His 9-9-9 plan sounds good, but in reality all it does is add a VAT tax. He will never get a 9% flat income tax or a 9% corporate tax through Congress, so in reality we will just end up with the same tax code we have now plus a 9% VAT. No thanks.

4. He supported bailing out the banks at the time and still does.

5. Supports the Patriot Act and also the assassination of Al-Awlaki, so our constitutional rights are obviously of no consequence to him.

I would rather not vote at all then vote for Cain, even if I do like him better than the other clowns like Romney, Perry, Christie, and company.

Skyhook79;921724 wrote:You could make a list like that for every Politician some list's would be longer (Obama's for example) but I doubt any would be shorter. Herman Cain would be better than who is currently in Office as would a couple other of the Repub candidates.

Skyhook79;921724 wrote:You could make a list like that for every Politician some list's would be longer (Obama's for example) but I doubt any would be shorter. Herman Cain would be better than who is currently in Office as would a couple other of the Repub candidates.

Cleveland Buck;921796 wrote:That's right, and that's why I like Cain more than the others. Perry, Romney, Obama, Christie are all the same. Cain is slightly different. I'm not voting for any of them. I'll vote for the one who is completely different from all of them.

QuakerOats;921463 wrote:Krauthammer Warns Obama Will Suffer Landslide Election


http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2011/09/29/krauthammer_warns_obama_will_suffer_landslide_election.html


bingo

Ty Webb;922041 wrote:Wow.....a conservative columnist saying the President "could" suffer a landslide. Yes...he said COULD not WILL

The Republican nominee could suffer a landslide as well

jmog;922059 wrote:I do not agree with Cain on everything, that is for sure. He is one of the only candidates (and that includes the current incumbant) who has real, actual ideas on how to fix things. Everyone else (save R.Paul) is just spitting out one liners and political rhetoric, that includes the current President as well.

However, I will give Obama credit for making that hard choice about using the drone to kill a terrorist who happens to be an American citizen.

1. He is an admitted terrorist who has stated his hatred for the US and has been involved in plans to attack the US. That is the definition of Treason.
2. Treason is the only crime described in our Constitution and is punishable by death.
3. Would be nearly impossible to go in and arrest him in Yemen.
4. This is no different than a murderer who is holding a hostage with a gun and a police sniper shoots the killer. That man would be a US citizen and got killed without a trial. This man was caught red handed, admitted his actions over and over again, and went to hide in a country we couldn't arrest him in. Sorry, but treason is punishable by death, and you declared war on the US, as a US citizen that is treason.

As much as I do not like Obama, he made a good, and VERY hard choice on this one. That was 10x harder than to go after Bin Laden.

believer;922029 wrote:Sooooo....you're voting for Obama then?

O-Trap;922136 wrote:Obama and conventional Republicans:

Have a chronic history of deficit spending.

Strain military budgets and resources by unnecessary military action overseas.

Have enacted stimulus packages while in the White House.

Have a history of infringing on state rights and personal liberties.

Meddle in the private sector unnecessarily.

Engage in unconstitutional military conflict.


It seems the Obama and conventional Republicans are less different than I'd like to see.