hoops23;782604 wrote:Please don't ruin his internet cred, it's all he has.

Thanks.

thedynasty1998;782626 wrote:I've never told a blatant lie, so I'm good.

thedynasty1998;782626 wrote:I've never told a blatant lie, so I'm good.

thedynasty1998;782622 wrote:I'm sure the Cavs called every team and inquired about anyone that wouldnhave improved the team. Windhorst said that NO said Paul wasn't available. They probably then asked about other available players.

I started this discussion saying it was never a reality and then hoops said it was factual that the Cavs made an offer and even went as far as told me to do a google search. It isn't factual and the most relevant article we can find is a Q and A with a beat writer.

thedynasty1998;782626 wrote:I've never told a blatant lie, so I'm good.

thedynasty1998;782337 wrote:Okay are we throwing out rumors similar to the Chris Paul to Cleveland rumors? No way Okie City trades him for a draft pick unless it's the 1st and the 4th.

wildcats20;782366 wrote:lol No I'm saying that Westbrook is a 2 playing the 1.

BR1986FB;782863 wrote:"We?" Do you have a mouse in your pocket or something? Try READING next time. The sports talk guys on R&R brought this up (not MY rumor) and they had callers calling in about whether they'd do it. Some FOOL called in and said he'd actually give up the #1 AND 4 for Westbrook. smh

robj55;782465 wrote:Then why do they have to attack someone who has a differing opinion, I feel a lot of them are very insecure about the whole thing, way too sensitive.

BR1986FB;782880 wrote:I'm going to give you somewhat of a "pass" because you've only been on here about 6 months because you don't seem too familiar with their history. The reason SQ & Dynasty get slammed is because of their history. Dynasty has been an habitual troll on Cavs threads and will throw out the "contrarian" opinion to start shit. A lot of times I think he does it whether he believes it or not. Sometimes he says valid stuff, most times NOT. You're giving him WAY too much credit for his "knowledge."

SQ, on the other hand, is a flat out joke. Dude thinks he is the "king" of all things basketball. Thinks he knows more than anyone and is NEVER wrong. Anyone who doesn't agree with the "king" is a "peon", "peasant" or "idiot."

Now I said we'd give you a "pass" for maybe not knowing these guys' past history but I WOULD expect you to side with them being a CHeat/Lebron sympathizer.

thedynasty1998;782893 wrote:All the simple minded people on here (there's really only a handful) just take over threads with their nonsense and immaturity and like to throw out "troll" every time there is a differing opinion.

Raw Dawgin' it;782899 wrote:Sounds like the pot calling the kettle black to me

Jester;782588 wrote:I usually try not to get into shit like this, but dynasty, you look like a douche right now.

wildcats20;782641 wrote:You said it wasn't worth discussing. Yet you still are talking about it.

thedynasty1998;782893 wrote:What stuff have I ever said that wasn't a valid opinion? I said the Cavs wouldn't win the championship last year and everyone was up in arms. I said Lebron was leaving and I was called a troll. I don't like the Jamison trade and I don't know basketball. I thought Ferry was a horrible GM and I'm a troll.

Commander of Awesome;782906 wrote:


Yeah you would come in the Cavs threads after they just rolled in the first round squaking that "The Cavs weren't going to win" with nothing to back it up. It would be like me going onto a Mavs message board trying to rain on their parade screaming "lol 2006 All over again! LMAO MAvs are going to get burned again! lolmavs suck lol. LMAO at you trying to act innocent, you're such a POS. Looking forward for your threatening PMs to start raining in. I can't wait to see you crying on Taylor's shoulder because you're getting pwned so hard on here. LMAO hoops, KR, like_that, BR, Jester, and even Wildcats have pwned you. I can't believe you're still talking. Its pathetic.

BR1986FB;782909 wrote:I really don't have an issue with a differing opinion but I HATE when people dive bomb a thread just to stir shit up. As an example I have no issue with Steelers fans coming on a Browns thread to talk FOOTBALL but if they are popping in just to stir it up, then fuck em.

I make a comment about a potential trade discussion that was talked about on Cleveland sports talk radio, by a guy who is STILL well connected in the league (Michael Reghi) and dynasty jumps in and dismisses it as hogwash. It's highly possible the trade never happens but just because the proverbial "tree" falls in the woods with nobody around doesn't mean the trade talk didn't happen.

thedynasty1998;782950 wrote:Your radio guy is pathetic if he really believed Westbrook to Cleveland had any chance at all.

BR1986FB;782969 wrote:It sounds like Cleveland was the one reaching out to OKC and I'd hardly call Reghi "pathetic." You'd probably get along with him swimmingly because he often comes across as a pompous "know it all." You'd have THAT in common. And I'm sure that someone like Reghi, who has been around the league for years, appreciates your input and "superior" NBA "intellect." :rolleyes:

And, of course, you prove my previous post chiming in with this shit.

BR1986FB;782969 wrote:It sounds like Cleveland was the one reaching out to OKC and I'd hardly call Reghi "pathetic." You'd probably get along with him swimmingly because he often comes across as a pompous "know it all." You'd have THAT in common. And I'm sure that someone like Reghi, who has been around the league for years, appreciates your input and "superior" NBA "intellect." :rolleyes:

And, of course, you prove my previous post chiming in with this shit.

wes_mantooth;782983 wrote:"bring it strong"!!!

hoops23;782427 wrote: IMO, with Green, OKC makes it a series with Dallas.

BR1986FB;782864 wrote:This was brought up also in the discussion re a trade for Westbrook but most agreed he isn't a good enough outside shooter to be a #2.

wildcats20;782989 wrote:Yeah, but he can develop an outside shot.
.

BR1986FB;782991 wrote:Yeah, that was also discussed in that Jordan didn't have the best outside game in his early years. Not comparing Westbrook to Jordan but I think you get my point.

wildcats20;782994 wrote:Absolutely.

I mean look at what Bron is doing with his jumper now. It was broke as I am when he first came in the League and now it's becoming one of the more consistent ones.

BR1986FB;782909 wrote:
I make a comment about a potential trade discussion that was talked about on Cleveland sports talk radio, by a guy who is STILL well connected in the league (Michael Reghi) and dynasty jumps in and dismisses it as hogwash. .