thedynasty1998;782361 wrote:Yes they were. There would have been much better offers and he wasn't going to sign long term. It didn't make sense for either side.
wildcats20;782366 wrote:lol No I'm saying that Westbrook is a 2 playing the 1.
wildcats20;782366 wrote:lol No I'm saying that Westbrook is a 2 playing the 1.
hoops23;782368 wrote:Regardless, there was truth to the rumors, so again, people were allowed to discuss the matter. Stop being an idiot..
hoops23;782372 wrote:True, but remember, Westbrook was thrown into the PG spot after NEVER playing it before. It's hard to change mentality.
Hb31187;782373 wrote:Lol do you guys just find reasons to start shit with him?
Im not backing anyone up, Just get sick of most of the threads being everyone vs Dynasty or everyone Vs Boss because it gets really really annoying to read. Thats allhoops23;782377 wrote:Oh please. He takes subtle jabs such as the previous one with CP3 rumors and acts like Cavs fans just take shit and run with it... I was simply telling him that there was truth to the rumors so there was no issue with them being discussed.
If you want to back him up, that's fine, but don't act like he's not doing shit.
hoops23;782368 wrote:Regardless, there was truth to the rumors, so again, people were allowed to discuss the matter. Stop being an idiot..
Hb31187;782379 wrote:Im not backing anyone up, Just get sick of most of the threads being everyone vs Dynasty or everyone Vs Boss because it gets really really annoying to read. Thats all
Hb31187;782379 wrote:Im not backing anyone up, Just get sick of most of the threads being everyone vs Dynasty or everyone Vs Boss because it gets really really annoying to read. Thats all
thedynasty1998;782382 wrote:Show me a legit reporter who mentioned it as being slightly realistic. Cavs fans threw it around. There was no substance. The Lakers rumored offer was Bynum, Odom and picks if I remember correctly. The Cavs couldn't touch that.
thedynasty1998;782358 wrote:Harden has 3 years left and as a team they are WAY under the cap. Both guys are under 22 so there is zero chance they trade either.
So someone on a Cleveland radio station throws out a unrealistic trade and we are supposed to just run with it? That's fucking dumb. I'd never repeat half the bullshit some of the morons in Columbus mention on the radio.hoops23;782377 wrote:Oh please. He takes subtle jabs such as the previous one with CP3 rumors and acts like Cavs fans just take shit and run with it... I was simply telling him that there was truth to the rumors so there was no issue with them being discussed.
If you want to back him up, that's fine, but don't act like he's not doing shit.
Hb31187;782401 wrote:But back to what was being discussed....If the Thunder for some reason have actually offered this trade, The Cavs should accept it riiiight away. Westbrook is a star, and this draft is anything but special
hoops23;782413 wrote:No way the Cavs get Westbrook unless OKC feels that Kyrie Irving is going to be a better fit in terms of being a facilitator.. Irving is a much better creater.
However, I don't see OKC moving Harden nor Westbrook. I think they continue to move on with this team and add the pieces.. I do think they look at moving Perkins.
Hb31187;782373 wrote:Lol do you guys just find reasons to start shit with him?
thedynasty1998;782412 wrote:So someone on a Cleveland radio station throws out a unrealistic trade and we are supposed to just run with it? That's fucking dumb. I'd never repeat half the bullshit some of the morons in Columbus mention on the radio.
Westbrook will not be traded. It's dumb to suggest it.
And the Chris Paul rumors on here were equally as dumb. Again, show me a credible reporter who supports your claim.
hoops23;782400 wrote:Again, it doesn't matter IF the Cavs offer was as good or not, the fact is it was offered. Cavs fans discussed the issue.
Again, you're being ignorant about the situation. ANY teams fans will talk about a rumor involving another superstar coming to their team.
Hb31187;782401 wrote:But back to what was being discussed....If the Thunder for some reason have actually offered this trade, The Cavs should accept it riiiight away. Westbrook is a star, and this draft is anything but special
KR1245;782408 wrote:Well, there were rumors a few years ago about a possible trade. I heard Windy mention James Harden name on the radio. I know that you think you always have the answers but in this case you might be wrong. They were open to trading him in the past, who's to say they wouldnt be open to it again. 3 years is a loooong time in the NBA
Hb31187;782419 wrote:Yeah I agree that Irving is def a better pure PG, But Westbrook is a rare talent and id honestly be kinda shocked if they move him. So idk where this rumor is coming from
Their core should be untouchable if i were the gm(Harden, Durant, Ibaka and Westbrook). Wouldnt be shocked to see them move Perk, he doesnt really fit with the uptempo style they run, and hes overpaid IMO.
hoops23;782422 wrote:LOL.
Just give it up. Seriously. If you don't like the fact that we discuss shit about our team here's a novel idea, GTFO of our thread?
I'm not going to spend a second looking up something you could find yourself by doing a google search or something, because I don't really care to. It's done and over with, maybe you should get over it?
robj55;782420 wrote:yes they do, because he has a differing opinion and insight than they have as cavs fans
KR1245;782437 wrote:Are you saying that the Cavs never tried to acquire Chris Paul? Those were all rumors?
