thedynasty1998;780493 wrote:That's my point about adding Kanter to play with Hickson. I'm not saying to bench Hickson.
Pay in Memphis? You're going back that far? I personally think a PF is of more value than a PG. It's a matter if opinion. An average PG can be hidden. An average PF will get abused because that position is so good and deep in the NBA.
Right, because PG isn't deep...
CP3, DWill, Rondo, Rose, Westbrook...
Then you have
Jennings, Holiday, Evans (though he plays both G positions), John Wall, Darren Collison etc...
Hell, you may have seen the emergence of Jeff Teague in the playoffs as well...
It's not like OKC didn't hide average PF play... The two teams in the NBA Finals don't even have prototypical PF's... Chicago doesn't even have a bonafide All Star at PF...
I'm much higher on an elite caliber PG than I am a PF. IMO, it's easier to hide an average PF than it is a PG. A PG is the guy running the offense and you need to have a guy who can give it back to those aforementioned PG's as well.
If you have a PF who can give you some offense, but also rebound and defend, you'll be fine. The fact is though, you'll need more than 1 great player regardless of position.