103
1 burcher clay
2 smith min
3 hammonds dov
4 patterson mead
112
1 miller carr
2 langdon clay
3 hendershott w holmes
4 larrison mear
119
1 warner iv
2 brock tva
3 warner clay
4 good camb
125
1 scherer rv
2 morehouse w holmes
3 palotta np
4 avery clay
130
1 rohskoph wh
2 weinneger dov
3 herron clay
4 meeks np
135
1 jolley wh
2 patterson tva
3 jones car
4 scrudders camb
140
1 warner clay
2 miller wh
3 shalosky dov
4 stone camb
145
1 stitzlein wh
2 burkhart clay
3 eppley rv
4 smith mead
152
1 ponchak mor
2 riker np
3 peters clay
4 endres dov
160
1 boyce min
2 jones tva
3 hill np
4 larson wh
171
1 kullman min
2 walters rv
3 harding clay
4 barrow np
189
1 johnson dov
2 kelton rv
3 hill np
4 poole car
215
1 johnson clay
2 gunn camb
3 shaloski dov
4 dolvin car
hwt
1 castillo np
2 lehr dov
3 felton min

Can you confirm these are the seeds? Or are they your picks?

toughest sectional in div 2

american guesser;678965 wrote:toughest sectional in div 2

I have to say, when I looked at this one, I thought the same thing

american guesser;678965 wrote:toughest sectional in div 2

This one is tough too......

Napoleon---Division II

Toledo CC
Oak Harbor
Wauseon
Napoleon
Eastwood
Defiance
Bryan
Maumee
Rossford

I grabbed these seeds from another site.
I definately think this and napolean are the toughest hands down. I am not sure what the east was trying to do by taking Claymont and Dover from Buckeye local and switching some of the others around. It has clearly made the two sectionals very unbalanced. I would really like to see the teams seeded. I understand you will have some classes loaded and others not still, but atleast you would have the best "teams" leading each sectional into districts. Just my opinion.

Charger;679472 wrote:I grabbed these seeds from another site.
I definately think this and napolean are the toughest hands down. I am not sure what the east was trying to do by taking Claymont and Dover from Buckeye local and switching some of the others around. It has clearly made the two sectionals very unbalanced. I would really like to see the teams seeded. I understand you will have some classes loaded and others not still, but atleast you would have the best "teams" leading each sectional into districts. Just my opinion.

Agree 100%....traditionally in the past the 2 East sectionals at Meadowbrook and Buckeye Local were extremely uneven....with BL being MUCH tougher. Now the folks in charge have made changes and moved teams around. But you're right....they did nothing to balance things out. Now BL is much weaker then the Claymont sectional. In essence, nothing has changed. Granted.....the East covers a huge geographic area, but I think they are doing the wrestlers there an injustice. Each year there are multiple cases of kids left sitting home for the District meet who should be wrestling.....

Would it cause that many problems to seed and divide the teams like the Central does?

I think they should just seed it like basketball or anything else. Rank the teams 1-24 or however many there may be. Let #1 decide one sectional or the other, then #2,#3 and so on. If a team would rather be in sectional A because its closer, so be it. I just feel in the long run it hurts the teams as a whole because a kid that maybe didnt get out of a tough sectional is sitting that could have scored a few points at districts. Again i know this could still happen to a few kids, but to me I want to see the best TEAMS from my district have a solid chance of competing at the next level.

Basically what we have now is the Claymont sectional is a repeat of the ECOL from last week with minerva, carrolton, Tri Valley and West holmes now in the mix

Brackets are up......

http://www.ovaecwrestling.com/Clay%20Sectional%20Bracket%20'11.pdf