Commander of Awesome;751422 wrote:Been reading that the Browns have Fairley in their top 8. I wouldnt be jumping up for joy if we picked him.
Commander of Awesome;751422 wrote:Been reading that the Browns have Fairley in their top 8. I wouldnt be jumping up for joy if we picked him.
mucalum49;751430 wrote: I don't see the Browns vying for #1 overall pick in 2012.
Tough call. I looked at the #12 pick's record from 2007-2010. The team with that pick usually has 7-8 wins with Minnesota being the exception this year with only 6 wins. By trading next years pick we would be essentially saying that with Julio Jones in the mix the Browns believe they'll finish better (or equal to) 7-9 or 8-8. There are so many factors that are at play with late free agency, player development, injuries, etc that will go on between this draft and next but I don't think that getting to 6-8 wins is an outrageous proposition.Sonofanump;751459 wrote:Is Julio Jones worth that?
Laley23;751367 wrote:I understand where your coming from, but as my father always told me, "you play for now, cross tomorrow's bridge when you get there. If you are cautious for the future, the present will undoubtedly fail."
Commander of Awesome;751428 wrote:Never understood when a player says that. Don't they realize the the schedule might have them playing in GB in December regardless if their from SD or Miami? Idiot Comment of the Draft right there.
lhslep134;751515 wrote:The Oklahoma City Thunder would respectfully disagree.
Commander of Awesome;751428 wrote:Never understood when a player says that. Don't they realize the the schedule might have them playing in GB in December regardless if their from SD or Miami? Idiot Comment of the Draft right there.
Laley23;751523 wrote:??
lhslep134;751527 wrote:They didn't play to win now. They won by building for the future. What's confusing about that? You said "win now" I implied that's not always right. 2 years ago they were 23-59.
Laley23;751537 wrote:Yes. Im not saying sell everything for a single player or anything. Im saying, you cant NOT make a move that is good in hopes you land a player in next years draft. Now, they have to decide if this move is a good move or not, but turning it down because it takes you out of the Andrew Luck sweepstakes is a huge mistake imo. There is NO guarantee he will be a Brown, just because we have a first rounder.
lhslep134;751526 wrote:Don't you realize that a player who plays in a warm city will probably live and work there for 9+ months of the year, as well as playing 8 games there and 3 others against divisional foes who have the same type of climate?
Guess ya had the idiot comment of the thread there. "Pwned"
lhslep134;751547 wrote:I mean I definitely agree with that.
Truthfully, I hope we draft a QB in the lower rounds who is accurate and therefore good for the WCO. Two names that jump out that should grade out to around a 4th or 5th round that I would like are Greg McElroy and Scott Tolzien. Both are very accurate, and have sneaky mobility. Even taking a chance on Pat Devlin just for some competition wouldn't be the worst thing in the world.
Commander of Awesome;751549 wrote:Yeah maybe they play in SD but have KC and Denver in their division? LOLFAIL. Or play in Miami but have a division game in NE in Dec? LMAO nice fail dipshit. Also most players dont live in the city they play in. Players like Cribbs are the exception.
BR1986FB;751545 wrote:http://www.cleveland.com/browns/index.ssf/2011/04/cleveland_browns_are_talking_w.html
Pick6;751556 wrote:I just dont see the Bengals picking Green..
lhslep134;751527 wrote:They didn't play to win now. They won by building for the future. What's confusing about that? You said "win now" I implied that's not always right. 2 years ago they were 23-59.
BR1986FB;751561 wrote:Gabbert?
Pick6;751570 wrote: They have plenty of old and young talent on the roster at that position.
