I will say I didn’t know the answer to a few of the questions. I don’t know what’s more important lowering inflation or lowering unemployment for example. I also had no clue what they were asking on the global economic/ trans global questions. But that is probably pretty close to where I belong 

I’ll take this later this coming weekend

Quite a few that I was neutral on but had to choose one side. I'm probably a littler farther down socially than this, and probably a little further right economically, but it's in the general vicinity that I would expect.

Daaaaayuuum. Say hello to Adolph and J Paul Getty while you’re over there

Alright.

posted by Devils Advocate

Daaaaayuuum. Say hello to Adolph and J Paul Getty while you’re over there

Funny, but I think Adolph would be pretty far up the authoritarian Y axis…but still funny comment  

You fuckers better accept my liberally conservative views or I will force you to be nice to me.

posted by Devils Advocate

You fuckers better accept my liberally conservative views or I will force you to be nice to me.

You saved and shared the wrong picture  

I didn’t ever say I was competent

I always thought that I was liberally conservative.  And Justin, Adolf says that Rogers is a punk ass bitch

Some of the questions were horrbily worded, but still fun.

You're right about the wording. I feel like my answers to the questions as worded don't reflect what they are asking. Like is it important for MY kids to get an education? Yes, do I think that all kids should get a religious education? no. I think I'll do it again and change my answers on questions like that, see what it says.

so when i did it again, answering the questions how i think they are asking them, i'm a little more libertarian and quite a bit less liberal.

https://www.politicalcompass.org/yourpoliticalcompass_js?ec=-3.0&soc=-3.74

I got kind of what JCrazy got on his first one, but as said before, there are a number of questions that were awkwardly phrased. Or at least in a way where I thought the question had a lot of gray area and "agree" "strongly disagree" and so on did not reflect it.

And yes, not savvy enough to just insert the chart. And too lazy to bother with finding the way to do so.

posted by justincredible

Quite a few that I was neutral on but had to choose one side. I'm probably a littler farther down socially than this, and probably a little further right economically, but it's in the general vicinity that I would expect.

Nearly identical to mine - I was ever slightly more to the right, and big shocker that I was one lower toward libertarian

Though I found the wording of some of those questions problematic, especially when there's no "don't care" or "N/A" options.

My economic leanings I suppose are right leaning in the sense that free markets are a conservative view, though "conservative" and "right/Republican" have become increasingly disjointed.

Socially I'm fairly liberal, but in today's age a rational view on social issues I guess is automatically right-of-center.

Anyone else wondering how many tries it took JMOG to produce his posted result? :)

Several years ago this test was much better worded with more thoughtful questions imo. Not sure why the creators changed it so much.

Here's mine:

Reps for my fellow bottom righters.

posted by justincredible

Reps for my fellow bottom righters.

You obviously meant to say "far right MAGA"

posted by gut

You obviously meant to say "far right MAGA"

Obviously.

posted by gut

Anyone else wondering how many tries it took JMOG to produce his posted result? :)

Knew that was coming, but expected it from geeblock. 

To be honest I thought I would be more where justin was, down in libertarian world but more right. 

I think if a few of the questions weren't worded so bad AND there was a "neutral" 5th option rather than just agree/disagree for the middle, I probably would have been more "right".

I specifically remember the "do you think its a woman's duty to prioritize their children over their career". 

I disagreed mainly because of the word duty.

If it had said "do you believe it is overall beneficial for families and society for women to raise their children full time" my answer would have been agree as actual studies show this to be true. But calling it a "duty" sounds too "Stepford Wives" to me.

I refuse to take it for the same reason I hang up on pollsters.

posted by jmog

If it had said "do you believe it is overall beneficial for families and society for women to raise their children full time" my answer would have been agree as actual studies show this to be true. But calling it a "duty" sounds too "Stepford Wives" to me.

Thought the exact same thing.

Seems like we've forgotten how to even talk about these issues.  It shouldn't be an LSAT-level parsing of words to figure out the answer.

And that's an otherwise loaded question.  Sure, it's beneficial to societies for women to raise their children.  That should be unobjectionable, but it's been turned into a sexist view. Because, hey, I also believe it's beneficial for society for MEN to raise their children. BOTH parents.  In fact, YES it's a duty for parents to raise their children.  

They've turned something completely unobjectionable into a right-wing sexist position.

Not a good test if you can tell exactly which answers land you where.  Makes you ask "where does their funding come from", because if there's value in that test I'm not seeing it.