Epstein "Suicide"

I've been seeing people on Twitter (yeah, I know) saying that Trump kicked Epstein out of one of his places years ago. Has that actually been verified?

Just googled.

I found this: https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-news/labor-secretary-acosta-out/h_2d721675c816ccb7d6dd65bc27996ca7
 

President Trump confirmed reports that he threw Jeffrey Epstein out of his Mar-a-Lago club years ago, adding, "I was not a fan of Jeffrey Epstein."

I'm not buying this because... what's with the pics of him smiling when they're standing with one arm around the other?  And why invite him to Mar a Lago to begin with?

posted by CenterBHSFan

I've been seeing people on Twitter (yeah, I know) saying that Trump kicked Epstein out of one of his places years ago. Has that actually been verified?

I think Trump said that, so I'm sure it's 100% true.

Not sure if you saw it, but it's up there with one of the all-time creepy comments:

Trump told New York magazine in 2002 that Mr. Epstein was a “terrific guy” whom he had known for 15 years.  “He’s a lot of fun to be with,” Trump said. “It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side.”

posted by CenterBHSFan

Just googled.

I found this: https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-news/labor-secretary-acosta-out/h_2d721675c816ccb7d6dd65bc27996ca7
 

I'm not buying this because... what's with the pics of him smiling when they're standing with one arm around the other?  And why invite him to Mar a Lago to begin with?

While knowing the dude and having a friendly "rich dude" relationship with him don't indicate any wrong-doing on Trump's part, did you think there was even a .000001% chance of him describing his relationship with him in any way other than the most self-serving way possible? That's just how he is. They could have just been two rich dudes who hung out in similar social circles, were friendly acquaintances and Trump just knew he liked younger chicks but had no clue it was pedo-young because they weren't really that close and he'd be acting like he never liked him and didn't want to be around him at all...regardless of what he was saying about him back in the day while posing for pics with him. He just operates on the principle of "Only believe what I'm saying RIGHT NOW and ignore anything that may contradict that, even if it was something I said previously!!!"

posted by CenterBHSFan

Just googled.

I found this: https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-news/labor-secretary-acosta-out/h_2d721675c816ccb7d6dd65bc27996ca7
 

I'm not buying this because... what's with the pics of him smiling when they're standing with one arm around the other?  And why invite him to Mar a Lago to begin with?

Food for thought:

Be aware of a common leftist tactic to plant fake stories to create false equivalencies and destroy the credibility of true stories. For example, the long history of mysterious deaths surrounding the Clinton’s is well-known and documented. But littered through these stories are a few fake, easily-disproven death rumors. So, when someone mention the Clinton associate death history, Democrats only need point out a few of the fake stories, which destroys the credibility of the whole storyline. Also, a ton of obviously fake stories have been planted about mysterious deaths surrounding Donald Trump. So, when prominent Democratic donor & Clinton friend, Jeffrey Epstein, dies in perhaps the most obvious fake suicide in American history, Twitter had both trending #ClintonBodyCount and #TrumpBodyCount tweets. The neutral observer hears about both and concludes all are fake news conspiracy theories. Anyone paying attention knows Epstein was an uber-liberal connected to many powerful Democrats, with Bill Clinton visiting his “Lolita Island” 26 times. The Clinton’s, above anyone else, have the history and motive to have him killed. Yet, the media largely have ignored these connections and instead played up a couple harmless 20-30 year old pictures and Trump quotes with Epstein. It is hilarious to watch the media express outrage at the “conspiracy theories” about Epstein’s murder backed by “no evidence” after 3 years of Trump-Russia stories received 24-7 coverage despite any evidence.

Food for thought:

Be aware of a common blind partisan tactic to twist anything so that it paints "their side" in the best possible light, while pretending that any and all wrongdoing was obviously done by those considered the opposition.

posted by QuakerOats

 

Food for thought:

Be aware of a common leftist tactic to plant fake stories to create false equivalencies and destroy the credibility of true stories. For example, the long history of mysterious deaths surrounding the Clinton’s is well-known and documented. But littered through these stories are a few fake, easily-disproven death rumors. So, when someone mention the Clinton associate death history, Democrats only need point out a few of the fake stories, which destroys the credibility of the whole storyline. Also, a ton of obviously fake stories have been planted about mysterious deaths surrounding Donald Trump. So, when prominent Democratic donor & Clinton friend, Jeffrey Epstein, dies in perhaps the most obvious fake suicide in American history, Twitter had both trending #ClintonBodyCount and #TrumpBodyCount tweets. The neutral observer hears about both and concludes all are fake news conspiracy theories. Anyone paying attention knows Epstein was an uber-liberal connected to many powerful Democrats, with Bill Clinton visiting his “Lolita Island” 26 times. The Clinton’s, above anyone else, have the history and motive to have him killed. Yet, the media largely have ignored these connections and instead played up a couple harmless 20-30 year old pictures and Trump quotes with Epstein. It is hilarious to watch the media express outrage at the “conspiracy theories” about Epstein’s murder backed by “no evidence” after 3 years of Trump-Russia stories received 24-7 coverage despite any evidence.

A lemming on the left (i.e. your counterpart) might argue that conservatives plant the fake death stories in order to give credibility of the body count theory by deflecting any specific criticisms of it (e.g. "Of course that one example isn't fair, that's a liberal plant to try to undermine the theory.").

The following individuals, among many, remain deceased:

Vince Foster

Danny Casolera

Jerry Parks

Jon Parnell Walker

Victor Thorn

Barry Seal

Suzanne Coleman

Kathy Ferguson

Bill Shelton

Ron Miller

Seth Rich

Alan Standorf

Ian Spiro

Dennis Eisman

And on, and on ……..

posted by QuakerOats

 

The following individuals, among many, remain deceased:

 

Vince Foster

Danny Casolera

Jerry Parks

Jon Parnell Walker

Victor Thorn

Barry Seal

Suzanne Coleman

Kathy Ferguson

Bill Shelton

Ron Miller

Seth Rich

Alan Standorf

Ian Spiro

Dennis Eisman

 

And on, and on ……..

If the Clintons are so good at killing people, why haven't they gotten Linda Tripp, Monica Lewinsky, Paula Jones, Ken Starr, Rush Limbaugh, Newt Gingrich, Bernie Sanders, etc.  A couple stupid enough to get embarrassed by the likes of Paula Jones, Linda Tripp, Bernie Sanders et al are at the same time sophisticated enough to kill like the Terminator?

What makes it any more likely that the Clintons killed Epstein than a whole host of other big hitters including Trump, Les Wexner, Prince Andrew, etc. 

The Clintons dont have to be good at killing people, they just have to be good at knowing someone that is

posted by Dr Winston O'Boogie

If the Clintons are so good at killing people, why haven't they gotten Linda Tripp, Monica Lewinsky, Paula Jones, Ken Starr, Rush Limbaugh, Newt Gingrich, Bernie Sanders, etc.  A couple stupid enough to get embarrassed by the likes of Paula Jones, Linda Tripp, Bernie Sanders et al are at the same time sophisticated enough to kill like the Terminator?

 

What makes it any more likely that the Clintons killed Epstein than a whole host of other big hitters including Trump, Les Wexner, Prince Andrew, etc. 

I’m not certain, maybe the guy did hang himself.  But I am pretty certain that the other three do not have body count lists.  Arkancide is ‘word’ for a reason.

posted by QuakerOats

 

 

I’m not certain, maybe the guy did hang himself.  But I am pretty certain that the other three do not have body count lists.  Arkancide is ‘word’ for a reason.

I would bet that if you cared to spend weeks sifting through the web, you could put together "body count" lists for virtually any well-know name out there.  A dude who used to bully me in middle school died of sudden, unexpected heart failure at age 42 a few years back.  I guess I have my own body count list.  

An autopsy performed on Jeffrey Epstein showed he "sustained multiple breaks in his neck bones," the Washington Post reported Wednesday.

Wow, what a suicide, he went all out!

posted by Commander of Awesome

An autopsy performed on Jeffrey Epstein showed he "sustained multiple breaks in his neck bones," the Washington Post reported Wednesday.

 

Wow, what a suicide, he went all out!

It is truely a shame that the murder will be covered up also

Strangled.  Cameras off.  Imagine that.

How very ..........

Russian

Both guards apparently fell asleep on duty at exactly the same time. Do these people actually think anyone believes any of the garbage they are spewing?

posted by Rotinaj

Both guards apparently fell asleep on duty at exactly the same time. Do these people actually think anyone believes any of the garbage they are spewing?

 

No but as the days go by, the story slides to page 2 then 3 and then poof.......nobody cares

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7353967/Did-Jeffrey-Epstein-portrait-Bill-Clinton-blue-dress-red-heels-NYC-mansion.html