Uranium One / Clinton Foundation / obama DoJ corruption

QuakerOats Senior Member
11,701 posts 59 reps Joined Nov 2009
Thu, Dec 17, 2020 12:21 PM

Would not be surprised if Hunter has an 'accidental' overdose.

sportchampps Senior Member
7,527 posts 33 reps Joined Nov 2009
Thu, Dec 17, 2020 1:34 PM

When Trump doesn’t pardon himself or his kids but Biden has to pardon Hunter what will the media say

QuakerOats Senior Member
11,701 posts 59 reps Joined Nov 2009
Thu, Dec 17, 2020 3:32 PM

N O T H I N G

gut Senior Member
18,369 posts 102 reps Joined Nov 2009
Thu, Dec 17, 2020 3:35 PM
posted by sportchampps

When Trump doesn’t pardon himself or his kids but Biden has to pardon Hunter what will the media say

They'll declare it a witch hunt?

But seriously, no one is refuting the payments, some of which are public record.  This is actual evidence of a potentially compromising conflict of interest...you know, the thing Dems and their media stomped their feet for over 3+ years based entirely on supposition on not facts?

When Hunter is eventually called to testify before Congress, I wonder what the media will say when he pleads the 5th to every other question?

Spock Senior Member
5,271 posts 9 reps Joined Jul 2013
Thu, Dec 17, 2020 6:41 PM
posted by gut

They'll declare it a witch hunt?

But seriously, no one is refuting the payments, some of which are public record.  This is actual evidence of a potentially compromising conflict of interest...you know, the thing Dems and their media stomped their feet for over 3+ years based entirely on supposition on not facts?

When Hunter is eventually called to testify before Congress, I wonder what the media will say when he pleads the 5th to every other question?

There is no way he goes in front of congress.

gut Senior Member
18,369 posts 102 reps Joined Nov 2009
Fri, Dec 18, 2020 7:30 PM

I don't know if any "heads are going to roll", but I'm enjoying the hell out of the liberal media scrambling to ignore and dismiss the Swalwell and Hunter Biden stories.  Cranked up the old hyperbole hysteria on Trump to a 12, but when there's actual evidence of serious issues with Democrats it's crickets.

Meanwhile, more "Russia Russia Russia" for Trump not condemning the recent hacking, even though that's not been proven (but, par for the course, "anonymous sources" have said it was Russia).

Fletch Member
0 posts 2 reps Joined Nov 2020
Fri, Sep 17, 2021 8:08 AM

So Durham is nailing a Clinton attorney for the Russia collision thing. 


Shocker that some low level guy falls on the sword

QuakerOats Senior Member
11,701 posts 59 reps Joined Nov 2009
Thu, Nov 4, 2021 12:16 PM

Fletch Member
0 posts 2 reps Joined Nov 2020
Thu, Nov 4, 2021 12:30 PM

Shocker how it takes this long to unravel something that most of us figured out on day 1

gut Senior Member
18,369 posts 102 reps Joined Nov 2009
Thu, Nov 4, 2021 1:27 PM

I realize it's still ongoing and they might be building to bigger fish, but 3 people?  THREE!?!

So you just dove in to what may have been the largest investigation of an individual in history?  Without corroborating the predicate provided by mostly 1 guy?  And how in the world could the higher ups possibly defend themselves against negligence charges?

Also, when Republicans take back the House, are they going to impeach Adam Schiff?  Knowingly lying, and using his position/appointments to provide authority & credibility....in my book that's the same as leaking, which is a felony.

QuakerOats Senior Member
11,701 posts 59 reps Joined Nov 2009
Mon, Nov 8, 2021 4:56 PM

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2021/11/08/john_durham_is_getting_close_to_the_jugular_146702.html





Hillary colluding with the Russians .............my how it all comes full circle.

gut Senior Member
18,369 posts 102 reps Joined Nov 2009
Mon, Nov 8, 2021 5:18 PM
posted by QuakerOats

Hillary colluding with the Russians .............my how it all comes full circle.

The NYT had established the Hillary link early on in the hoax.  I realize that proving criminal charges is a much higher hurdle, but odd how quickly and completely the Hillary part of the story got pushed aside.

Oppo research certainly isn't a crime, but the way in which the Dossier was laundered & delivered....That always smelled, and it really seems like a politically motivated fraud was pulled on the  DOJ.


Fletch Member
0 posts 2 reps Joined Nov 2020
Mon, Nov 8, 2021 5:25 PM
posted by gut

The NYT had established the Hillary link early on in the hoax.  I realize that proving criminal charges is a much higher hurdle, but odd how quickly and completely the Hillary part of the story got pushed aside.

Oppo research certainly isn't a crime, but the way in which the Dossier was laundered & delivered....That always smelled, and it really seems like a politically motivated fraud was pulled on the  DOJ.


The way it was paid for was surely illegal

gut Senior Member
18,369 posts 102 reps Joined Nov 2009
Mon, Nov 8, 2021 5:31 PM
posted by Fletch

The way it was paid for was surely illegal

Not sure about that, but definitely some issues there.

You can't pay a foreign firm for research, but if you hire a US firm then it's ok for them to pay foreigners.  Maybe.  Really a nonsensical distinction.  But I don't expect Clinton did anything criminal - if anyone knows how to do extremely shady shit legally, it's the Clintons.

QuakerOats Senior Member
11,701 posts 59 reps Joined Nov 2009
Tue, Nov 9, 2021 12:38 PM

A lot of the criminals all have a not-coincidental connection with the liberal Brookings Institute.


Amazing how that happens.

QuakerOats Senior Member
11,701 posts 59 reps Joined Nov 2009
Tue, Nov 9, 2021 2:31 PM

Printed in USA Today ..........shocker; trying to get ahead of the curve to limit their embarrassment 


https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/no-collusion-how-americans-were-fed-a-false-tale-about-donald-trump-s-2016-campaign/ar-AAQuezH?ocid=msedgntp



Then you have CNN and MSNBC and the other networks still quadrupling down on their fraudulent 'reporting'

gut Senior Member
18,369 posts 102 reps Joined Nov 2009
Tue, Nov 9, 2021 2:56 PM
posted by QuakerOats

Printed in USA Today ..........shocker; trying to get ahead of the curve to limit their embarrassment

That is pretty shocking.  But I might instead suggest that it's just a moderate/conservative writer who can finally run that story without fear of being fired.

You see some of it on CNN and other places to, where they occasionally pretend to try to be objective.  They knew.  They all knew.  You don't get to come out years later pretending like honest mistakes were made when it's obvious you deliberately lied.

QuakerOats Senior Member
11,701 posts 59 reps Joined Nov 2009

Login

Register

Already have an account? Login