Progressives, part 3...

Spock Senior Member
5,271 posts 9 reps Joined Jul 2013
Wed, Sep 25, 2019 6:08 PM

Whistleblower complaint is 12 pages......I am sure it was written without help.

geeblock Member
1,123 posts 0 reps Joined May 2018
Wed, Sep 25, 2019 6:34 PM

My thoughts on reading this summary of the transcript is it doesn’t look like much but it’s important to note that the transcript of the cal has not been released. There are multiple interviews where gulliani and trump say they asked the Ukraine to investigate Biden so it seems very likely they did. Is that something that should be impeachable? I’m not sure but they did impeach Clinton for lying about a blowjob so 

Spock Senior Member
5,271 posts 9 reps Joined Jul 2013
Wed, Sep 25, 2019 8:33 PM
posted by geeblock

My thoughts on reading this summary of the transcript is it doesn’t look like much but it’s important to note that the transcript of the cal has not been released. There are multiple interviews where gulliani and trump say they asked the Ukraine to investigate Biden so it seems very likely they did. Is that something that should be impeachable? I’m not sure but they did impeach Clinton for lying about a blowjob so 

Wut?  The transcript was released.  There is no word for word.  Calls weren't recorded.  2 people listen in and transcribe in real time.  If issue arises  the notes are compared.  This procedure was stated by the media yesterday.

 

As for Clinton....he was impeached for lying to Congress.  Clinton didnt break the law.

Spock Senior Member
5,271 posts 9 reps Joined Jul 2013
Wed, Sep 25, 2019 8:35 PM

Let me add....all this doesnt matter.  The dems are going to vote for impeachment regardless of what they have.  They don't care about anything but interfering in the 2020 election domestically in the courts.

 

 

geeblock Member
1,123 posts 0 reps Joined May 2018
Thu, Sep 26, 2019 10:57 AM
posted by Spock

Wut?  The transcript was released.  There is no word for word.  Calls weren't recorded.  2 people listen in and transcribe in real time.  If issue arises  the notes are compared.  This procedure was stated by the media yesterday.

 

As for Clinton....he was impeached for lying to Congress.  Clinton didnt break the law.

the transcript wasn't released, and i think that is the whole point of the whistleblower complaint  is that there was recording that the WH worked to suppress. Im not sure it really matters tho, its not like hes really denying what hes being accused of but rather saying its not a big deal.

Spock Senior Member
5,271 posts 9 reps Joined Jul 2013
Thu, Sep 26, 2019 11:11 AM
posted by geeblock

the transcript wasn't released, and i think that is the whole point of the whistleblower complaint  is that there was recording that the WH worked to suppress. Im not sure it really matters tho, its not like hes really denying what hes being accused of but rather saying its not a big deal.

Well he didnt break any laws.....so theres that.

gut Senior Member
18,369 posts 117 reps Joined Nov 2009
Thu, Sep 26, 2019 11:51 AM
posted by Spock

...The dems are going to vote for impeachment regardless of what they have. 

Are they?  I haven't followed super closely, but it sounds like Pelosi SHOULD have a vote for a formal impeachment "inquiry", but is deliberately trying an end-around on a vote she might lose.  Trying to placate the left while protecting the moderates in red districts.

Which should provide some interesting legal battles.  If indeed she needs a formal vote for even an "inquiry", then the argument would go you don't have the elevated subpoena powers if you haven't had an official vote....which they'll probably then use as more grounds for impeachment.

 

Tom Member
25 posts 0 reps Joined Apr 2018
Thu, Sep 26, 2019 12:31 PM
posted by Spock

Wut?  The transcript was released.  There is no word for word.  Calls weren't recorded.  2 people listen in and transcribe in real time.  If issue arises  the notes are compared.  This procedure was stated by the media yesterday.

 

As for Clinton....he was impeached for lying to Congress.  Clinton didnt break the law.

I guess I always thought when someone lied under oath to a grand jury that was considered breaking the law. 

Federal District Judge Susan Webber Wright wrote:

Simply put, the president's deposition testimony regarding whether he had ever been alone with Ms. (Monica) Lewinsky was intentionally false, and his statements regarding whether he had ever engaged in sexual relations with Ms. Lewinsky likewise were intentionally false ...

From this Clinton was fined $90,000 and given a 5-year ban on practicing law when he later plea-bargained to a $25,000 fine.

I think he did break the law.

Dr Winston O'Boogie Senior Member
3,345 posts 37 reps Joined Oct 2010
Thu, Sep 26, 2019 12:48 PM
posted by Spock

 

As for Clinton....he was impeached for lying to Congress.  Clinton didnt break the law.

He was impeached for lying to the court in the Paula Jones case, not for lying to Congress.  

majorspark Senior Member
5,459 posts 39 reps Joined Nov 2009
Thu, Sep 26, 2019 1:50 PM

Schiff is a fool.

https://twitter.com/RealSaavedra/status/1177229878879387648

Dr Winston O'Boogie Senior Member
3,345 posts 37 reps Joined Oct 2010
Thu, Sep 26, 2019 2:04 PM

I know it's not realistic, but if people would quit paying so much attention to these assclowns in DC, this kind of nonsense would slow down.  The impeachment garbage is 95% about getting on TV for the individual member.  

gut Senior Member
18,369 posts 117 reps Joined Nov 2009
Thu, Sep 26, 2019 2:09 PM
posted by majorspark

Schiff is a fool.

https://twitter.com/RealSaavedra/status/1177229878879387648

It's pretty amazing that Pelosi has actually become the non-crazy voice of reason in that party.

If most of our politicians weren't committed to being career politicians, the sane people in both parties would have already broken off to form a plurality 3rd party.

gut Senior Member
18,369 posts 117 reps Joined Nov 2009
Thu, Sep 26, 2019 2:10 PM
posted by Dr Winston O'Boogie

I know it's not realistic, but if people would quit paying so much attention to these assclowns in DC, this kind of nonsense would slow down.  The impeachment garbage is 95% about getting on TV for the individual member.  

If the media weren't their lapdogs they wouldn't get away with this crap.  Instead their media runs cover and interference.

iclfan2 Reppin' the 330/216/843
9,465 posts 100 reps Joined Nov 2009
Thu, Sep 26, 2019 2:28 PM

Matt Walsh made a good point on twitter yesterday. It's amazing seeing all of the old videos from the 90s of prominent people talking about impeachment, and these same ass clowns are still in power! Bunch of the same people have been running this country for 20+ years. How depressing.

Spock Senior Member
5,271 posts 9 reps Joined Jul 2013
Thu, Sep 26, 2019 2:42 PM
posted by iclfan2

Matt Walsh made a good point on twitter yesterday. It's amazing seeing all of the old videos from the 90s of prominent people talking about impeachment, and these same ass clowns are still in power! Bunch of the same people have been running this country for 20+ years. How depressing.

And that is exactly why we are here....Trump is not one of them.  He is busting up the status quo.  

wkfan Senior Member
1,850 posts 13 reps Joined Nov 2009
Thu, Sep 26, 2019 2:46 PM
posted by iclfan2

Matt Walsh made a good point on twitter yesterday. It's amazing seeing all of the old videos from the 90s of prominent people talking about impeachment, and these same ass clowns are still in power! Bunch of the same people have been running this country for 20+ years. How depressing.

Term limits.......Congress was not meant to be a career path

QuakerOats Senior Member
11,701 posts 67 reps Joined Nov 2009
Thu, Sep 26, 2019 3:18 PM
posted by majorspark

Schiff is a fool.

https://twitter.com/RealSaavedra/status/1177229878879387648

 

 

His security clearance should be revoked, and by default then he should be removed from the committee.  If he had not already received a security clearance, there is zero chance he could get one now.  He is the biggest leaker, liar and phony in congress today ….and that is saying something.

QuakerOats Senior Member
11,701 posts 67 reps Joined Nov 2009
Thu, Sep 26, 2019 3:40 PM

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OS_ybCgkg4w

 

 

Phil Mudd stating what needs to be stated and understood, beginning at the 2:50 mark.

 

This whole charade absolutely proves one thing:  The United States intelligence apparatus is STILL spying on the president of the United States of America.

QuakerOats Senior Member
11,701 posts 67 reps Joined Nov 2009
Thu, Sep 26, 2019 4:05 PM
posted by QuakerOats

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OS_ybCgkg4w

 

 

Phil Mudd stating what needs to be stated and understood, beginning at the 2:50 mark.

 

This whole charade absolutely proves one thing:  The United States intelligence apparatus is STILL spying on the president of the United States of America.

 

 

 

And now we know; it was the CIA spying on the president.

 

Good God, talk about a crisis in our foundation.  Maybe it is time to shut down the CIA until it is completely drained.

geeblock Member
1,123 posts 0 reps Joined May 2018
Thu, Sep 26, 2019 5:34 PM
posted by QuakerOats

 

 

 

And now we know; it was the CIA spying on the president.

 

Good God, talk about a crisis in our foundation.  Maybe it is time to shut down the CIA until it is completely drained.

Just to be clear what parts of the accusations are you saying aren’t true? I’m assuming obviously that he withheld funds unless they helped with Biden. Anything else? 

Login

Register

Already have an account? Login