Impressed by the Trump administration part II

Spock Senior Member
5,271 posts 9 reps Joined Jul 2013
Mon, Apr 16, 2018 7:30 PM
posted by ptown_trojans_1

I mean, sounds like something he should have disclosed on air, but whatever. I find it pretty funny and just further validates Hannity is just a fucking tool. 

Why should he do or say anything?  Do You walk around telling people who your lawyer is?

I guess the right should be demanding to know who Rachel Maddow attorney is.

 

gut Senior Member
18,369 posts 117 reps Joined Nov 2009
Mon, Apr 16, 2018 7:33 PM
posted by Spock

Why should he do or say anything?  Do You walk around telling people who your lawyer is?

I guess the right should be demanding to know who Rachel Maddow attorney is.

When you're doing a story on Cohen, yeah you should disclose your personal/professional relationship to him.

Spock Senior Member
5,271 posts 9 reps Joined Jul 2013
Mon, Apr 16, 2018 8:13 PM
posted by gut

When you're doing a story on Cohen, yeah you should disclose your personal/professional relationship to him.

No.  No you don't.  Hannity stated that he never retained him and or payed to represent him.  There is no there there.

 

Now as for attorney client privilege....its dead.  Assigning a neutral committee to review material ?    Hahah...there isn't one neutral person in DC

superman Senior Member
4,377 posts 71 reps Joined Nov 2009
Mon, Apr 16, 2018 8:20 PM

Judge Kimba Wood is presiding over this case. She officiated George Soros' wedding. There's your collusion. 

QuakerOats Senior Member
11,701 posts 66 reps Joined Nov 2009
Tue, Apr 17, 2018 9:35 AM

https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2018/04/17/donald-trump-tax-day-economy-column/518919002/

 

Change we can [really] believe in ...

gut Senior Member
18,369 posts 117 reps Joined Nov 2009
Tue, Apr 17, 2018 9:44 AM
posted by Spock

No.  No you don't.  Hannity stated that he never retained him and or payed to represent him.  There is no there there.

So Hannity, who never retained or paid Cohen for representation, wants to invoke privilege AND asked to remain confidential?    mmmkay

Even some of his colleagues on Fox said he should have disclosed the relationship.

QuakerOats Senior Member
11,701 posts 66 reps Joined Nov 2009
Tue, Apr 17, 2018 10:09 AM

ALL the drive-by media today:  "Cohen's third client - Hannity".  No where in ANY of these articles is their mention of Hannity countering that portrayal as untrue, with the fact that he never retained or paid Cohen for anything.  

 

Liberal media trying to make news, from fake news, again.  Will they ever learn?

8,788 posts 20 reps Joined Nov 2009
Tue, Apr 17, 2018 10:25 AM
posted by gut

So Hannity, who never retained or paid Cohen for representation, wants to invoke privilege AND asked to remain confidential?    mmmkay

Even some of his colleagues on Fox said he should have disclosed the relationship.

Yeah, but Hannity does not give a shit about journalistic standards. 

posted by QuakerOats

ALL the drive-by media today:  "Cohen's third client - Hannity".  No where in ANY of these articles is their mention of Hannity countering that portrayal as untrue, with the fact that he never retained or paid Cohen for anything.  

 

Liberal media trying to make news, from fake news, again.  Will they ever learn?

It's not fake news man. It was reported by Cohen's attorney in actual court. Also, if there was nothing to see here and he was never retained or paid, then why would he want to block the release of his name, and why is his name even in any of the court documents? I also do not believe a single word out of Hannity's mouth. 

That all said, I agree this is just a funny as shit side show. 

 

HOF on coattails Junior Member
222 posts 4 reps Joined Apr 2014
Tue, Apr 17, 2018 2:53 PM
posted by Spock

No.  No you don't.  Hannity stated that he never retained him and or payed to represent him.  There is no there there.

Now as for attorney client privilege....its dead.  Assigning a neutral committee to review material ?    Hahah...there isn't one neutral person in DC

Even you should be able to understand how it's a conflict of interest.  Remember, Fox is a new agency after all and not just Trump advisers.   Supposedly Hannity spoke with Cohen over real estate.....lol, Cohen isn't even the right lawyer for that!

 

Cohen had three clients between 2017 and 2018

Trump- Known that Cohen paid Stormy Daniels hush money.

Elliot Broidy- Resigned after Cohen brokered the deal to ex-Playmate model who was impregnated by Broidy.  

 

3rd client - Hannity, over real estate?     yea....ok.  

 

QuakerOats Senior Member
11,701 posts 66 reps Joined Nov 2009
Tue, Apr 17, 2018 2:55 PM

Judge Kimba Wood is the one who pressed for Hannity's name.  She would be the same Kimba Wood who in the 1990's was up for US Attorney General under one William Clinton, and was interviewed by Hillary Clinton, in the process.  She ultimately lost out on the position because of her illegal alien housekeeper (which would be a badge of honor by today's standards), but it appears her fondness for Clinton enabled her to justify her absurd ruling.  

 

Amazing how these Clintonista's continue to reappear in every venue we turn to.  

HOF on coattails Junior Member
222 posts 4 reps Joined Apr 2014
Tue, Apr 17, 2018 3:06 PM
posted by QuakerOats

Judge Kimba Wood is the one who pressed for Hannity's name.  She would be the same Kimba Wood who in the 1990's was up for US Attorney General under one William Clinton, and was interviewed by Hillary Clinton, in the process.  She ultimately lost out on the position because of her illegal alien housekeeper (which would be a badge of honor by today's standards), but it appears her fondness for Clinton enabled her to justify her absurd ruling.  

 

Amazing how these Clintonista's continue to reappear in every venue we turn to.  

Don't bother mentioning that Wood did so when it was completely legal and also paid the necessary taxes for the worker.

QuakerOats Senior Member
11,701 posts 66 reps Joined Nov 2009
Tue, Apr 17, 2018 4:20 PM

Tell us how her loyalty and support to Clinton is assisting with her impartiality in the Cohen seizures. 

8,788 posts 20 reps Joined Nov 2009
Tue, Apr 17, 2018 4:30 PM
posted by QuakerOats

Tell us how her loyalty and support to Clinton is assisting with her impartiality in the Cohen seizures. 

LOL. I love it. You know that is impossible to prove as most of the documents in the case are redacted. 

Man, your hatred for Clinton knows no bounds. 

I'm reserving judgment, but I do trust the judicial process to play out. 

QuakerOats Senior Member
11,701 posts 66 reps Joined Nov 2009
Tue, Apr 17, 2018 4:42 PM

I don't hate her/them; I just understand they are ruthless criminals, and vindictive ones at that. 

 

 

 

 

BTW, Seth Rich is still deceased. 

gut Senior Member
18,369 posts 117 reps Joined Nov 2009
Tue, Apr 17, 2018 5:49 PM
posted by HOF on coattails

Hannity spoke with Cohen over real estate.....lol, Cohen isn't even the right lawyer for that!

Actually, he's bought 5 homes for LLC's....which is what rich people do when they don't want any Tom, Dick and Harry looking up where they live.  So it's entirely plausible he did facilitate or advise Hannity on a real estate transaction or two he was considering.

HOF on coattails Junior Member
222 posts 4 reps Joined Apr 2014
Tue, Apr 17, 2018 6:12 PM

Well, did ya see the latest news?  I suppose it's entirely plausible for whatever reason, Hannity having ties to two other Trump-connected lawyers.

"A cease-and-desist letter signed by two lawyers for Hannity: Victoria Toensing and Jay Alan Sekulow."

Hannity quote - "mostly over real estate"

You're right.  I'm sure it's nothing.

CenterBHSFan 333 - I'm only half evil
7,259 posts 55 reps Joined Nov 2009
Tue, Apr 17, 2018 8:13 PM

I don't care about Hannity. I will never care about Hannity until or unless he pulls a Bill Ayers. 

Spock Senior Member
5,271 posts 9 reps Joined Jul 2013
Wed, Apr 18, 2018 11:09 AM

So can someone tell and justify at the same time why this is even news???  

Heretic Son of the Sun
20,517 posts 204 reps Joined Nov 2009
Wed, Apr 18, 2018 11:24 AM

Hannity is TV entertainment for people too stupid to actually follow news. Anything that crushes him is a boon for THE PEOPLE.

QuakerOats Senior Member
11,701 posts 66 reps Joined Nov 2009

Login

Register

Already have an account? Login