posted by Con_AlmaAre you sure it's Sessions that you should be upset with?
"...Sessions has a point, or a piece of a point, when he argues that the Obama-era memos did not merely clarify DOJ practices but in effect changed federal law over the heads of Congress. It would be better if Congress changed federal law to better accommodate states in which marijuana is legal; it would be even better if Congress did not have to do so, the federal jurisdiction being confined to its proper role in these matters, which is interstate and international. John Paul Stevens will forgive me for suggesting that the Supreme Court erred in its decision in Gonzales v. Raich, which enshrined the federal power to regulate marijuana consumption within the borders of a single state under its interstate commerce powers, a nonsensical conclusion but one not entirely inconsistent with precedent regarding the interstate-commerce clause, the elasticity of which apparently is infinite. ..."
Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/455170/jeff-sessions-marijuana-legalization-solution
This popped up in my feed today, which kinda reiterates your point.
http://reason.com/blog/2018/01/04/blame-scotus-for-allowing-the-feds-to-ta