Boehner vs. Obama

Politics 18 replies 580 views
C
cbus4life
Posts: 2,849
Mar 29, 2010 9:28pm


Priceless.
J
JoeA1010
Posts: 191
Mar 29, 2010 9:49pm
Excellent job by Boehner. Telling our self-appointed masters (Obama, etc.) hell no you can't is exactly what I want from my public servants.
ptown_trojans_1's avatar
ptown_trojans_1
Posts: 7,632
Mar 29, 2010 9:52pm
Clever.
Mr. 300's avatar
Mr. 300
Posts: 3,090
Mar 29, 2010 10:33pm
The greatest teleprompter pres we've ever had.
CenterBHSFan's avatar
CenterBHSFan
Posts: 6,115
Mar 29, 2010 10:47pm
On the right hand, we have (what certain folks like to claim) "the party of no"
On the left hand, we have "the party of dismissal"

One likes to say no to everything that comes down the opposite pike, and...
The other likes to dismiss everybody who doesn't sufficiently play the part of sycophant.
majorspark's avatar
majorspark
Posts: 5,122
Mar 29, 2010 10:56pm
Give Boehner another couple of years in those DC tanning booths and he might have a chance.
ptown_trojans_1's avatar
ptown_trojans_1
Posts: 7,632
Mar 29, 2010 11:00pm
majorspark wrote: Give Boehner another couple of years in those DC tanning booths and he might have a chance.
Maybe he was saying "Hell No!" to the tax increase on tanning beds?
dwccrew's avatar
dwccrew
Posts: 7,817
Mar 29, 2010 11:02pm
I can't understand a damn word Obama and his sheep are saying.
C
cbus4life
Posts: 2,849
Mar 29, 2010 11:03pm
Hmm, i had thought people would be able to just laugh at it, but i guess that isn't really possible anymore... :(

Oh well.

Only thing i was thinking when i was watching was..."this is fucking funny."
dwccrew's avatar
dwccrew
Posts: 7,817
Mar 29, 2010 11:08pm
I didn't find it that humorous, although I realized that was the intent of the video. I guess I just have a different type of humor.
majorspark's avatar
majorspark
Posts: 5,122
Mar 29, 2010 11:14pm
ptown_trojans_1 wrote:
majorspark wrote: Give Boehner another couple of years in those DC tanning booths and he might have a chance.
Maybe he was saying "Hell No!" to the tax increase on tanning beds?
LOL! That 10% tax is why Boehner wants this bill repealed. Poor guy will go broke.
S
superman
Posts: 3,582
Mar 29, 2010 11:17pm
Race Baiting was really what this video was about.
2quik4u's avatar
2quik4u
Posts: 4,388
Mar 29, 2010 11:27pm
lame
S
Swamp Fox
Posts: 2,218
Mar 31, 2010 6:59am
I think that the Conservatives are starting to get a little nervous about the political picture in 2012. Dow up 4,000 since Obama took office, employment figures, while still poor, are starting to show signs of emerging from the economic disaster we were buried in, health care, for years denied to folks who had little or no way to afford it, and/or recently taken away arbitrarily by companies who dropped their employee's coverage, is now becoming available to massive numbers of people. Yep, we are in the business of subsidizing people, but then we have been doing that on a large scale since at least the 1930's. It's not a new idea. Plus, all of these folks who the president has helped are voters...and there are a lot of them. I think the elections coming up are going to be a lot more interesting than the Conservatives want to admit. I personally would much rather subsidize people who needed it than CEO's who get huge buy-outs with their bail out money. I know, I know, you Conservatives believe it's wrong either way, right? I think there are millions out there who vigorously and vehemently disagree with you.
fish82's avatar
fish82
Posts: 4,111
Mar 31, 2010 7:30am
Swamp Fox wrote: I think that the Conservatives are starting to get a little nervous about the political picture in 2012. Dow up 4,000 since Obama took office, employment figures, while still poor, are starting to show signs of emerging from the economic disaster we were buried in, health care, for years denied to folks who had little or no way to afford it, and/or recently taken away arbitrarily by companies who dropped their employee's coverage, is now becoming available to massive numbers of people. Yep, we are in the business of subsidizing people, but then we have been doing that on a large scale since at least the 1930's. It's not a new idea. Plus, all of these folks who the president has helped are voters...and there are a lot of them. I think the elections coming up are going to be a lot more interesting than the Conservatives want to admit. I personally would much rather subsidize people who needed it than CEO's who get huge buy-outs with their bail out money. I know, I know, you Conservatives believe it's wrong either way, right? I think there are millions out there who vigorously and vehemently disagree with you.
CS,B
Q
QuakerOats
Posts: 8,740
Mar 31, 2010 8:19am
Swamp Fox wrote: I think that the Conservatives are starting to get a little nervous about the political picture in 2012. Dow up 4,000 since Obama took office, employment figures, while still poor, are starting to show signs of emerging from the economic disaster we were buried in, health care, for years denied to folks who had little or no way to afford it, and/or recently taken away arbitrarily by companies who dropped their employee's coverage, is now becoming available to massive numbers of people.
False. The dow was 8,200 when he took office and it was over 9,600 when he was elected. It is now about 10,900. You run numbers like the socialists in congress.

As for unemployment -- it is incredibly high and we have a president whose policies are anti-growth and anti-business; thus you can forget about that turning around any time soon; especially with the new burdens of the disastrous health care legislation. If you thought good jobs were hard to come by in the last 20 years, you haven't seen anything yet, so long as obama/pelosi/reid are running the country into the ground.
CenterBHSFan's avatar
CenterBHSFan
Posts: 6,115
Mar 31, 2010 9:30am


Just to open up the topic a little bit :)
fish82's avatar
fish82
Posts: 4,111
Mar 31, 2010 9:56am
CenterBHSFan wrote:

Just to open up the topic a little bit :)
LMAO...that guy's awesome! I liked "My Conservative Girlfriend," too. :D
A
assumption
Posts: 147
Mar 31, 2010 11:07am
QuakerOats wrote:
Swamp Fox wrote: I think that the Conservatives are starting to get a little nervous about the political picture in 2012. Dow up 4,000 since Obama took office, employment figures, while still poor, are starting to show signs of emerging from the economic disaster we were buried in, health care, for years denied to folks who had little or no way to afford it, and/or recently taken away arbitrarily by companies who dropped their employee's coverage, is now becoming available to massive numbers of people.
False. The dow was 8,200 when he took office and it was over 9,600 when he was elected. It is now about 10,900. You run numbers like the socialists in congress.

As for unemployment -- it is incredibly high and we have a president whose policies are anti-growth and anti-business; thus you can forget about that turning around any time soon; especially with the new burdens of the disastrous health care legislation. If you thought good jobs were hard to come by in the last 20 years, you haven't seen anything yet, so long as obama/pelosi/reid are running the country into the ground.
The old saying goes "figures don't lie but liars figure". Of course the 4000 gain on the Dow is wrong. What do your figures suggest? I look at the rise since he took office as a nice little gain. Many investors will agree. As for jobs; your take is nothing but speculation at best. At worst it appears you are like Limbaugh. "I hope he fails"