http://bleacherreport.com/articles/366456-the-difference-between-kobe-and-lebron-is-that-kobe-works
It's a good article for Kobe, but the thing I noticed the most about this article is the misconceptions about LeBron.
And the thing I hate the most is how they say Kobe earned his spot on the top and LeBron was handed his. That's bullshit. In the individual player debate, LeBron has certainly earned it. Look at his stats. But to say Kobe wasn't handed anything is insane. He got incredibly lucky from a timing stand point to be able to get to play with a prime Shaq in LA. LeBron has had to earn every level he's gotten to in the playoffs. First it was getting there, did that. Then it was winning a series, he took charge to make sure they did that. Then it was winning the conference and he stepped up to crush Detroit with the best playoff performance ever. He's earned his way to the top. He's done his part. He wasn't blessed with one of the 50 greatest players ever (a player good enough to make that list after a few years in the league) he's had to take his bumps in the road and learn from them. Wait for a team to be built around him (like Jordan had to) and make the best of what he had, while NEVER throwing his teammates under the bus. He carried a team that started ERIC SNOW to the Finals for God's sake.
I'm not downgrading Kobe, this article has a lot of good things to say about him and points out a lot of reasons to why he has become one of the best ever. But I think it's a great example of where LeBron doesn't get the respect that he earns. Too many people think he's had it handed to him. I think the nickname King James goes too far with people--it's just the nickname, started in AKRON because he IS the King of Akron.
And I can't understand the constant obsession from the Kobe side about LeBron wanting to be a global icon. About him wanting to push his name and capitalize as much as he can while he can. Why wouldn't you? The NBA dream doesn't last forever. When you retire at 40, can you maintain your standard of living? LeBron is setting up an empire like Jordan that will last long after his playing days. I don't understand why people automatically think that means he doesn't want to win. LOL, does that even make sense? Winning is everything, without winning that empire doesn't get as big as he wants it to. Jordan isn't Jordan without 6 titles. Winning is priority #1--you win and everything else takes care of itself.
I agree with some parts of the article that point out differences in them. They are very different, Kobe has had to make his name more than LeBron. But that shouldn't take away from what LeBron has done. He had the hype but he lived up to and surpassed it in a big way. The hype isn't speculation anymore when it's been accomplished. And don't bring the ring thing up--LeBron has clearly exceeded his hype even if he doesn't have a ring yet. It should be clear to everyone that it takes a team to win a title--LeBron has done everything you could ask of him and more to win. No one can deny that.
I just have a serious problem with a guy that says let's nix the LeBron talk until he accomplishes something great when the main discussion is about individual players. As an individual, to say that LeBron hasn't accomplished anything great is beyond stupid. Just a few in a long list of examples BY THE AGE OF 25: the best playoff performance ever, beating Kobe's record by more than 2 years to be the youngest to 15,000 points, MVP (his 2nd soon)...and the list goes on...
This is why we butt heads in the Kobe/LeBron debate so much--because the Kobe fans are intimidated and they don't want to give LeBron the respect he deserves as an individual.
SQ_Crazies
The Godfather
7,977
posts
SQ_Crazies
The Godfather
7,977
posts
Mon, Mar 22, 2010 7:52 AM
Mar 22, 2010 7:52 AM
Mar 22, 2010 7:52am