Pretty interesting stuff and it is being sold as inside info.

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2010/writers/seth_davis/02/22/hoop.thoughts/index.html?eref=sihp

Good read.

He nailed the SEC stuff, and was pretty spot on with what I think about some of the other teams.

Interesting about Georgia Tech. You could write that script about Paul Hewitt for the last 5 years or so. Great talent, someone who stands out from the pack at 3 or 4 positions, yet consistently undisciplined and turnover prone. I would have liked to see his take on Maryland, who to be honest, is the ACC team who has stayed afloat longer than I expected.

With Connecticut, it seems pretty simple how to beat them. Match Dyson and Walker and force anyone else to consistently score. Edwards has solid moves but it seems they rarely really throw him the ball and set him up to score.

The article has some good insight.IMO, very few teams pass the eye test as far as winning an NCAA Championship.

I agree with that. That's why this might be one of the best tournaments in a few years. Even the group of top tier teams aren't really that far separated from the rest of the pack.