Spiderman 4 to feature complete re-boot

Home ▸ Archive ▸ Serious Business ▸ Spiderman 4 to feature complete re-boot
gibby08's avatar

gibby08

Senior Member

1,581 posts
Feb 10, 2010 10:29 PM
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0948470/faq#.2.1.35

What would have been the sequel was taken off the table on January 10th of this year.

There will not be one returning cast member coming back including the director Sam Raimi.

This will be a disaster without Tobey Maguire and Kirsten Dunst
Feb 10, 2010 10:29pm
Trueblue23's avatar

Trueblue23

BASEDgod

7,463 posts
Feb 10, 2010 10:30 PM
Already a thread on this somewhere
Feb 10, 2010 10:30pm
Laley23's avatar

Laley23

GOAT

29,506 posts
Feb 10, 2010 10:32 PM
the 2nd and 3rd ones were terrible anyway. The first one was the only decent film of the series.
Feb 10, 2010 10:32pm
2quik4u's avatar

2quik4u

Senior Member

4,388 posts
Feb 10, 2010 10:35 PM
posted awhile ago
Feb 10, 2010 10:35pm
gibby08's avatar

gibby08

Senior Member

1,581 posts
Feb 10, 2010 10:38 PM
Went through 9 pages and couldnt find it.
Feb 10, 2010 10:38pm
Trueblue23's avatar

Trueblue23

BASEDgod

7,463 posts
Feb 10, 2010 10:39 PM
gibby08 wrote: Went through 9 pages and couldnt find it.
This isn't jjhuddle dude, we actually post here.
Feb 10, 2010 10:39pm
justincredible's avatar

justincredible

Nick Mangold

32,056 posts
Feb 10, 2010 11:00 PM
I bumped the other one up, it hadn't had any activity for a few weeks.
Feb 10, 2010 11:00pm
krambman's avatar

krambman

Senior Member

3,606 posts
Feb 11, 2010 12:20 AM
It's dumb to do this so close to the other ones. Even if it's better than the others people won't think so just because it's something totally different so close to the others. They should wait 10 more years to do something like this when the recent Spiderman movies are out of people's minds.
Feb 11, 2010 12:20am
SQ_Crazies's avatar

SQ_Crazies

The Godfather

7,977 posts
Feb 11, 2010 6:04 AM
It might be dumb to some of you, and I agree the movie will probably suck but it's Spiderman. There is always a whole new group of young kids to market it towards--LOTS of people will still go see this movie and buy it. $$$, that's all that matters.
Feb 11, 2010 6:04am
MANAZE's avatar

MANAZE

Senior Member

1,055 posts
Feb 11, 2010 4:53 PM
idk just never cared for any of the new spiderman movies really. I'm glad to see the change.
Feb 11, 2010 4:53pm
Z

ZeroCool

Senior Member

264 posts
Feb 11, 2010 7:04 PM
first three were too much about mj and not enough about ass kicking.
Feb 11, 2010 7:04pm
BuckeyeBlue's avatar

BuckeyeBlue

Senior Member

561 posts
Feb 11, 2010 7:23 PM
I'm kind of excited about this. I can't believe they had killed off two of Spiderman's most iconic enemies (Green Goblin and Doc Oc) in the first two movies. Does the villain REALLY have to die at the end of every super hero movie? The Joker didn't die at the end of Dark Knight, and that is probably the best super hero movie in a long time. I hope they can go back and make a Spiderman franchise that isn't almost complete garbage. The first movie was good, but the second and third were pretty bad.
Feb 11, 2010 7:23pm
I

I Wear Pants

Senior Member

16,223 posts
Feb 12, 2010 12:29 AM
The last two Spiderman movies were terrible, like, atrocious.
Feb 12, 2010 12:29am
T

tuskytuffguy

Senior Member

615 posts
Feb 12, 2010 12:51 AM
BuckeyeBlue wrote: I'm kind of excited about this. I can't believe they had killed off two of Spiderman's most iconic enemies (Green Goblin and Doc Oc) in the first two movies. Does the villain REALLY have to die at the end of every super hero movie? The Joker didn't die at the end of Dark Knight, and that is probably the best super hero movie in a long time. I hope they can go back and make a Spiderman franchise that isn't almost complete garbage. The first movie was good, but the second and third were pretty bad.
That's because Dark Knight was meant to be a PREQUEL, when the Joker had first appeared, you numbskull.
Feb 12, 2010 12:51am
hoops23's avatar

hoops23

Senior Member

15,696 posts
Feb 12, 2010 3:07 AM
After thinking about this, I think this may actually be a great idea. Spiderman 1 & 2 were both very good, but the 3rd started to fall apart.

They have a great director on board for this reboot. The only thing left is get rid of Spiderman 4 and just call it Spiderman.
Feb 12, 2010 3:07am
E

Eric Taylor

Senior Member

602 posts
Feb 12, 2010 8:02 AM
ccrunner609 wrote: this is going to fail huge.
I tend to agree with you here.
Feb 12, 2010 8:02am
Little Danny's avatar

Little Danny

Senior Member

4,288 posts
Feb 12, 2010 9:56 AM
BuckeyeBlue wrote: I'm kind of excited about this. I can't believe they had killed off two of Spiderman's most iconic enemies (Green Goblin and Doc Oc) in the first two movies. Does the villain REALLY have to die at the end of every super hero movie? The Joker didn't die at the end of Dark Knight, and that is probably the best super hero movie in a long time. I hope they can go back and make a Spiderman franchise that isn't almost complete garbage. The first movie was good, but the second and third were pretty bad.
If it is a re-boot, doesn't that mean that the Green Goblin and Dr. Octopus are still alive?

The movie actually is consistent with the comic book in relation to the Green Goblin. Norman Osborn does die by his own hand. Harry later becomes the Green Goblin as do a few other people.

Where the first three movie differ from the comics is on Peter and MJ. The MJ character in the movie was actually Gwen Stacey (the blonde girl from the third movie). Gwen lived next to Peter and dated Flash Thompson and Harry and Peter had a crush on her. MJ was Gwen's friend and was very stuck up. Peter eventually dates Gwen just as he did MJ in the movie. In the comics, the Green Goblin kills Gwen. The grieving Peter and MJ eventually become a couple and get married. It is always made pretty clear that Peter never got over Gwen.
Feb 12, 2010 9:56am